1   IPCC (2021). Working Group I sixth assessment report: The physical science basis – Full report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/#SPM.
2   IPCC (2023). Synthesis report (SYR) of the IPCC sixth assessment report (AR6): Summary for policymakers. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/.
3   Ivanovich, C.C., et al. (2023). Future warming from global food consumption. Nature Climate Change, 13(3), 297–302.
4   IPCC (2022). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change – Technical summary, Working Group III contribution to IPCC sixth assessment report. Cambridge, UK: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-3/.
5   FAO (2023). Land use in agriculture by the numbers. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: http://www.fao.org/sustainability/news/detail/en/c/1274219/ [accessed May 2023].
6   World Bank (2023). Water in agriculture. World Bank. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water-inagriculture [accessed May 2023].
7   Nawaz, A., et al. (2022). Increasing sustainability for rice production systems. Journal of Cereal Science, 103, 103400.
8   Sozzi, M., et al. (2018). Patent trends in agricultural engineering. Jelgava, Latvia: Engineering for rural development and University of Padova, Italy. Available at: https://www.tf.lbtu.lv/conference/proceedings2018/Papers/N329.pdf.
9   EPO (2022). Space-borne sensing and green applications, Patent insight report. Munich, Germany: European Patent Office. Available at: https://link.epo.org/web/Space-borne%20sensing%20and%20green%20applications%20report.pdf.
10   Caner, D., J. Claes, D. De Clercq and M. Taksyak (2023). Needle in a haystack: Patents that inspire agricultural innovation. McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/agriculture/our-insights/needle-in-a-haystack-patents-that-inspire-agricultural-innovation [accessed October 2023].
11   Trappey, A.J.C., et al. (2023). A comprehensive analysis of global patent landscape for recent R&D in agricultural drone technologies. World Patent Information, 74, 102216.
12   Chapelier, E., Hanaf, A. and Gourragne A. (2020). Patent mapping analysis in the field of agricultural robotics. Global Organization For Agricultural Robotics (GOFAR). Available at: https://www.agricultural-robotics.com/news/patentmapping-analysis-in-the-field-of-agricultural-robotics [accessed October 2023].
13   Caprarulo, V., et al. (2022). Innovations for reducing methane emissions in livestock toward a sustainable system: Analysis of feed additive patents in ruminants. Animals, 12(20), 2760.
14   Fatimi, A. (2021). The use of seaweeds in the formulation of feeds for livestock: Patent analysis. In 2nd International Electronic Conference on Animals – Global Sustainability and Animals: Welfare, Policies and Technologie. Basel, Switzerland: MDPI.
15   IP Australia (2023). Patent analytics on low emission technologies. Intellectual Property Office of Australia. Available at: https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/tools-and-research/professional-resources/data-research-andreports/publications-and-reports/2022/11/30/03/16/patent-analytics-on-low-emission-technologies [accessed October 2022].
16   ESA (2023). A closer look at the latest earth observation services industry trends. The European Space Agency (ESA). Available at: https://space-economy.esa.int/article/72/a-closer-look-at-the-latest-earth-observation-servicesindustry-trends [accessed October 2023].
17   Pixalytics (2023). How many earth observation satellites orbiting in 2023? Pixalytics. Available at: https://www.pixalytics.com/earth-observation-satellites-2023/ [accessed October 2023].
18   EPO (2022). Space-borne sensing and green applications. Patent insight report, Munich, Germany: European Patent Office. Available at: https://link.epo.org/web/Space-borne%20sensing%20and%20green%20applications%20report.pdf.
19   CPI (2022). Landscape of climate finance for agriculture, forestry, other land use and fisheries: Preliminary findings. Climate Policy Initiative (CPI). Available at: https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/landscape-of-climate-finance-for-agriculture-forestry-other-land-uses-and-fisheries/.
20   CPI (2023). Landscape of climate finance for agrifood systems. Climate Policy Initiative (CPI). Available at: https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Landscape-of-Climate-Finance-for-Agrifood-Systems.pdf.
21   CPI (2022). Landscape of climate finance for agriculture, forestry, other land use and fisheries: Preliminary findings. Climate Policy Initiative (CPI). Available at: https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/landscape-of-climate-finance-for-agriculture-forestry-other-land-uses-and-fisheries/.
22   Berkeley (2023). Berkeley carbon trading project: Voluntary registry offsets database. Center for Environmental Public Policy (CEPP) and Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley. Available at: https://gspp.berkeley.edu/research-and-impact/centers/cepp/projects/berkeley-carbon-trading-project/offsets-database [accessed October 2023].
23   CPI (2022). Landscape of climate finance for agriculture, forestry, other land use and fisheries: Preliminary findings. Climate Policy Initiative (CPI). Available at: https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/landscape-of-climate-finance-for-agriculture-forestry-other-land-uses-and-fisheries/.
24   CPI (2020). Examining the climate finance gap for small-scale agriculture. Climate Policy Initiative (CPI). Available at: https://www.ifad.org/documents/38714170/42157470/climate-finance-gap_smallscale_agr.pdf/34b2e25b-7572-b31d-6d0c-d5ea5ea8f96f.
25   CPI (2022). Landscape of climate finance for agriculture, forestry, other land use and fisheries: Preliminary findings. Climate Policy Initiative (CPI). Available at: https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/landscape-of-climate-finance-for-agriculture-forestry-other-land-uses-and-fisheries/.
26   AgFunder (2022). 2022 AgFunder AgriFoodTech Investment Report. San Francisco, CA: AgFunder. Available at: https://agfunder.com/research/2022-agfunder-agrifoodtech-investment-report/.
27   Bashi, Z., et al. (2019). Alternative proteins: The race for market share is on. McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/agriculture/our-insights/alternative-proteins-the-race-for-market-share-is-on.
28   McKinsey (2022). Make room for alternative proteins: What it takes to build a new sector. McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/make-room-for-alternative-proteins-what-it-takes-to-build-a-new-sector.
29   BCG (2022). The untapped climate opportunity in alternative proteins. Boston Consulting Group (BCG). Available at: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2022/combating-climate-crisis-with-alternative-protein.
30   Climate ADAPT (2023). Precision Agriculture. The European Climate Adaptation Platform Climate-ADAPT. Available at: https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/en/metadata/adaptation-options/precision-agriculture [accessed October 2023].
31   EDF (2023). ‘Precision Agriculture Loan Act’ unlocks new financing for climate solutions. Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). Available at: https://www.edf.org/media/precision-agriculture-loan-act-unlocks-new-financing-climate solutions [accessed October 2023].
32   MarketsandMarkets (2023). Precision farming market size, share, industry report, revenue trends and growth drivers. MarketsandMarkets. Available at: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/precision-farmingmarket-1243.html [accessed October 2023].
33   AgFunder (2022). AgFunder European investment report. San Fransisco, CA: AgFunder. Available at: https://research.agfunder.com/europe-2022-agrifoodtech-report-investnl.pdf.
34   World Bank (2023). World bank loan will support reducing methane, saving water in Hunan’s rice paddies. World Bank Group. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/05/31/world-bank-loan-will-supportreducing-methane-saving-water-in-hunan-s-rice-paddies [accessed October 2023].
35   IFAD (2023). New IFAD initiative will help reduce global warming by lowering methane emissions from small-scale farming. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). Available at: https://www.ifad.org/en/web/latest/-/new-ifad-initiative-will-help-reduce-global-warming-by-lowering-methane-emissions-from-small-scale-farming.
36   Berkeley (2023). Berkeley carbon trading project. Voluntary registry offsets database. Center for Environmental Public Policy (CEPP), Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley. Available at: https://gspp.berkeley.edu/research-and-impact/centers/cepp/projects/berkeley-carbon-trading-project/offsets-database [accessed October 2023].
37   Precedence Research (2023). Regenerative agriculture market. Precedence Research. Available at: https://www.precedenceresearch.com/regenerative-agriculture-market [accessed October 2023].
38   PepsiCo (2023). Pepsico issues new $1.25 billion 10-year green bond as company accelerates pep+ transformation. PepsiCo. Available at: https://www.pepsico.com/our-stories/press-release/pepsico-issues-new-125-billion-10-yeargreen-bond-as-company-accelerates-pep-tra07202022 [accessed October 2023].
39   Danone (2020). Danone North America and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation join forces. Danone North America. Available at: https://www.danonenorthamerica.com/news/danone-north-america-and-the-nationalfish-and-wildlife-foundation-join-forces-to-leverage-3-million-in-federal-funding-for-shared-commitmentto-regenerative-agriculture/ [accessed October 2023].
40   European Commission (2021). Evaluation of the impact of the Common Agricultural Policy on climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. Commission staff working document, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: http://op.europa.eu/en/publicationdetail/-/publication/7307349a-ba1a-11eb-8aca-01aa75ed71a1 [accessed October 2023].
41   USDA (2022). Partnerships for climate-smart commodities. United States Department for Agriculture (USDA). Available at: www.usda.gov/climate-solutions/climate-smart-commodities.
42   Climatewatch (2023). Climatewatch. Available at: https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ [accessed May 2023].
43   Havlík, P., et al. (2014). Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(10), 3709–14.
44   FAO (2019). Five practical actions towards low-carbon livestock. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: https://www.fao.org/3/ca7089en/ca7089en.pdf.
45   FAO (2016). Reducing enteric methane for improving food security and livelihoods. New Zealand: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/resources/reducing-enteric-methane-improving-food-security-and-livelihoods.
46   FAO (2016). Reducing enteric methane for improving food security and livelihoods. New Zealand: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) , New Zealand. Available at: https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/resources/reducing-enteric-methane-improving-food-security-and-livelihoods.
47   FAO (2016). Reducing enteric methane for improving food security and livelihoods. New Zealand: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) , New Zealand. Available at: https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/resources/reducing-enteric-methane-improving-food-security-and-livelihoods.
48   CCAC (2023). Enteric fermentation. Climate & Clean Air Coalition (CCAC) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Available at: https://www.ccacoalition.org/eN/Activity/enteric-fermentation [accessed May 2023].
49   IPCC (2022). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change – Full report, Working Group III contribution to IPCC sixth assessment report. Cambridge, UK: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-3/.
50   FAO (2016). Reducing enteric methane for improving food security and livelihoods. New Zealand: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) , New Zealand. Available at: https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/resources/reducing-enteric-methane-improving-food-security-and-livelihoods.
51   FAO (2016). Reducing enteric methane for improving food security and livelihoods. New Zealand: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) , New Zealand. Available at: https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/resources/reducing-enteric-methane-improving-food-security-and-livelihoods.
52   Pasture.io (2023). Scientists are breeding climate-friendly cows & soon they’ll be on your farm. Pasture.io. Available at: https://pasture.io/dairy-industry/breeding-climate-friendly-cows [accessed July 2023].
53   Cargill (2023). How feed impacts your farm’s methane output. Cargill. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/ [accessed June 2023].
54   FAO (2019). Five practical actions towards low-carbon livestock. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: https://www.fao.org/3/ca7089en/ca7089en.pdf.
55   FAO (2017). Livestock solutions for climate change. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: https://www.fao.org/3/i8098e/i8098e.pdf.
56   OECD and FAO (2023). OECD–FAO Agricultural Outlook 2023–2032. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Available at: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cc6361en.
57   OECD and FAO (2023). OECD–FAO Agricultural Outlook 2023–2032. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Available at: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cc6361en.
58   UN (2023). Peace, dignity and equality on a heathy planet. United Nations (UN). Available at: https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/population [accessed May 2023].
59   Corichi, M. (2021). Eight-in-ten Indians limit meat in their diets, and four-in-ten consider themselves vegetarian. Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/07/08/eight-in-ten-indians-limit-meatin-their-diets-and-four-in-ten-consider-themselves-vegetarian/ [accessed August 2023].
60   Leveau, M. (2022). The FoodTech Innovation ‘blind spots’ of the last decade – Going beyond the hype – Part 1. Forward Fooding. Available at: https://forwardfooding.com/blog/foodtech-trends-and-insights/the-foodtech-innovationblind-spots-go-beyond-the-hype-part-1/ [accessed 2023 June].
61   Leveau, M. (2022). The FoodTech Innovation ‘blind spots’ of the last decade – Going beyond the hype - Part 1. Forward Fooding. Available at: https://forwardfooding.com/blog/foodtech-trends-and-insights/the-foodtech-innovationblind-spots-go-beyond-the-hype-part-1/ [accessed 2023 June].
62   Protein Directory (2023). Protein Directory – The largest alt protein database globally. Available at: https://proteindirectory.com/ [accessed June 2023].
63   Leveau, M. (2022). The FoodTech Innovation ‘blind spots’ of the last decade - Going beyond the hype - Part 1. Forward Fooding. Available at: https://forwardfooding.com/blog/foodtech-trends-and-insights/the-foodtech-innovationblind-spots-go-beyond-the-hype-part-1/ [accessed 2023 June].
64   Crownhart, C. (2023). Here’s what we know about lab-grown meat and climate change. MIT Technology Review Explains. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/07/03/1075809/lab-grown-meat-climate-change/ [accessed July 2023].
65   Paradisi, L. (2021). Understanding the future of protein. Forward Fooding. Available at: https://forwardfooding.com/blog/foodtech-trends-and-insights/understanding-the-future-of-protein/ [accessed July 2023].
66   FAO (2019). Five practical actions towards low-carbon livestock. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: https://www.fao.org/3/ca7089en/ca7089en.pdf.
67   Engler, J.-O. and H. von Wehrden (2018). Global assessment of the non-equilibrium theory of rangelands: Revisited and refined. Land Use Policy, 70, 479–84.
68   Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–48.
69   Ross, E.B. (1998). The Malthus factor: Population, poverty, and politics in capitalist development, London and New York: Zed Books.
70   Helldén, U. (1991). Desertification – Time for an assessment. Ambio, 20(8), 372–83.
71   Fairhead, J. and M. Leach (1996). Colonial science & its relics in West Africa. In M. Leach and R. Mearns (eds) The lie of the land, challenging received wisdom on the African Environment. Oxford, UK: The International African Institute with James Currey, 105–21.
72   Fairhead, J. and M. Leach (1996). Misreading the African landscape: Society and ecology in a forest-savanna mosaic, African Studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73   Oksen, P. (2001). Cattle, conflict and change: Animal husbandry and Fulani – Farmer interactions in Boulgou province, Burkina Faso. Unpublished thesis (Ph.D.), Roskilde University.
74   Ellis, J.E., M.B. Coughenour and D.M. Swift (1993). Climate variability, ecosystem stability, and the implications for range and livestock development. In R.H. Behnke, I. Scoones and C. Kerven (eds), Range ecology at disequilibrium. London: Overseas Development Institute, 31–41.
75   Smith, S. (2023). 10 things you should do to get started with regenerative grazing. Noble Research Institute. Available at: https://www.noble.org/regenerative-agriculture/10-things-you-should-do-to-get-started-with-regenerativegrazing/ [accessed July 2023].
76   FAO (2017). Livestock solutions for climate change. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: https://www.fao.org/3/i8098e/i8098e.pdf.
77   CCAC (2023). Uruguay reduces livestock emissions while increasing productivity in a ccac-supported pilot project. Climate & Clean Air Coalition (CCAC) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Available at: https://www.ccacoalition.org/news/uruguay-reduces-livestock-emissions-while-increasing-productivity-ccac-supported-pilotproject [accessed October 2023].
78   CCAC (2023). Enteric fermentation. Climate & Clean Air Coalition (CCAC). United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Available at: https://www.ccacoalition.org/eN/Activity/enteric-fermentation [accessed May 2023].
79   FAO (2023). Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model (GLEAM). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: https://www.fao.org/gleam/en/ [accessed May 2023].
80   O’Sullivan, A., et al. (2019). Strategies to improve the productivity, product diversity and profitability of urban agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 174, 133–44.
81   UNFCCC (2023). Land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Available at: https://unfccc.int/topics/land-use/workstreams/land-use--land-use-change-andforestry-lulucf [accessed July 2023].
82   Ritchie, H., F. Spooner and M. Roser (2021). Deforestation and forest loss. OurWorldInData.org. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation [accessed August 2023].
83   Ritchie, H. (2021). Cutting down forests: What are the drivers of deforestation? OurWorldinData.org. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/what-are-drivers-deforestation [accessed August 2023].
84   Geist, H.J. and E.F. Lambin (2002). Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation: Tropical forests are disappearing as the result of many pressures, both local and regional, acting in various combinations in different geographical locations. BioScience, 52(2), 143–50.
85   Ritchie, H. (2021). Cutting down forests: What are the drivers of deforestation? OurWorldinData.org. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/what-are-drivers-deforestation [accessed August 2023].
86   Ritchie, H., F. Spooner, and M. Roser (2021). Deforestation and forest loss. OurWorldInData.org. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation [accessed August 2023].
87   Ritchie, H., F. Spooner, and M. Roser (2021). Deforestation and forest loss. OurWorldInData.org. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation [accessed August 2023].
88   UNFCCC (2023). Land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Available at: https://unfccc.int/topics/land-use/workstreams/land-use--land-use-change-andforestry-lulucf [accessed August 2023].
89   World Bank (2023). Eight Amazonian countries with the power to save the planet. The World Bank. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2023/07/05/ocho-paises-de-la-amazonia-con-el-poder-de-salvar-elplaneta-america-latina [accessed July 2023].
90   IPCC (2021). Working Group I Sixth Assessment Report: The Physical Science Basis – Summary for policymakers. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/#SPM.
91   Ritchie, H., F. Spooner, and M. Roser (2021). Deforestation and forest loss. OurWorldInData.org. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation [accessed August 2023].
92   Bossio, D.A., et al. (2020). The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions. Nature Sustainability, 3(5), 391–98.
93   Hicks Pries, C.E., et al. (2017). The whole-soil carbon flux in response to warming. Science, 355(6332), 1420–23.
94   EEA (2022). Briefing: Soil carbon. European Environment Agency (EEA). Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/soil-carbon [accessed June 2023].
95   Hawkins, H.-J., et al. (2023). Mycorrhizal mycelium as a global carbon pool. Current Biology, 33(11), R560–R73.
96   Hicks Pries, C.E., et al. (2017). The whole-soil carbon flux in response to warming. Science, 355(6332), 1420-23.
97   MIT (2023). Soil-based carbon sequestration. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Available at: https://climate.mit.edu/explainers/soil-based-carbon-sequestration [accessed June 2023].
98   IPCC (2021). Working Group I sixth assessment report: The physical science basis. Full report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/#SPM.
99   Bossio, D.A., et al. (2020). The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions. Nature Sustainability, 3(5), 391–98.
100   4 per 1000 (2023). The international “4 per 1000” initiative – Soils for food security and climate. Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD). Available at: https://4p1000.org/?lang=en [accessed June 2023].
101   Bossio, D.A., et al. (2020). The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions. Nature Sustainability, 3(5), 391–98.
102   Ellis, J. (2023). Reversing agriculture’s emissions with carbon-fixing soil inputs. Cleantech Group. Available at: https://www.cleantech.com/reversing-agricultures-emissions-with-carbon-fixing-soil-inputs/ [accessed July 2022].
103   Spears, S. (2018). What is biochar? Regeneration International. Available at: https://regenerationinternational.org/2018/05/16/what-is-biochar/ [accessed June 2023].
104   Baker, J.C. and K.E. Saxton (2007). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of no-tillage farming. In C.J. Baker and K.E. Saxton (eds), Notillage seeding in conservation agriculture, 2nd edn. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau (CAB) International, 1–10.
105   Powlson, D.S., et al. (2014). Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 4(8), 678–83.
106   Rainbow, R. and R. Derpsch (2011). Advances in no-till farming technologies and soil compaction management in rainfed farming systems. In P. Tow, et al. (eds), Rainfed farming systems. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 991–1014.
107   FAO (2021). A step-by-step approach toward a gradual adoption of the full conservation agriculture technology: An example from Timor-Leste. TECA – Technologies and Practices for Small Agricultural Producers. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: www.fao.org/in-action/kore/good-practices/good-practicesdetails/en/c/1413322 [accessed July 2023].
108   Rainbow, R. and R. Derpsch (2011). Advances in no-till farming technologies and soil compaction management in rainfed farming systems. In P. Tow, et al., eds., Rainfed farming systems, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 991–1014.
109   Rainbow, R. and R. Derpsch (2011). Advances in no-till farming technologies and soil compaction management in rainfed farming systems. In P. Tow, et al., eds., Rainfed farming systems, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 991–1014.
110   Colbach, N. and S. Cordeau (2022). Are no-till herbicide-free systems possible? A simulation study. Frontiers in Agronomy, 4.
111   Hanley, S. (2022). Agrivoltaics – Solar panels & tomatoes may be perfect for each other. Cleantechnica. Available at: https://cleantechnica.com/2022/12/01/agrivoltaics-solar-panels-tomatoes-may-be-perfect-for-each-other/ [accessed July 2023].
112   Casey, T. (2023). More bad news for fossil fuels: Rooftop solar meets agrivoltaics. Cleantechnica. Available at: https://cleantechnica.com/2023/04/07/more-bad-news-for-fossil-fuels-rooftop-solar-meets-agrivoltaics/ [accessed July 2023].
113   FAO (2022). World food and agriculture: Statistical yearbook 2022. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cc2211en.114 IRRI (2023). Manual transplanting. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Available at: http://www.knowledgebank.irri.org/training/fact-sheets/crop-establishment/manual-transplanting#:~:text=Why%20transplant%20rice%3F,and%20has%20variable%20water%20levels. [accessed July 2023].
115   IRRI (2019). Machine transplanting. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Available at: https://ghgmitigation.irri.org/mitigation-technologies/machine-transplanting [accessed July 2023].
116   Linquist, B., et al. (2012). An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. Global Change Biology, 18(1), 194–209.
117   Umali-Deininger, D. (2022). Greening the rice we eat. Washington, DC: World Bank. available: https://blogs.worldbank.org/eastasiapacific/greening-rice-we-eat?cid=SHR_BlogSiteEmail_EN_EXT.
118   Kurnik, J. and K. Devine (2022). Innovation in reducing methane emissions from the food sector: Side of rice, hold the methane. World Wildlife Fund. Available at: https://www.worldwildlife.org/blogs/sustainability-works/posts/innovation-in-reducing-methane-emissions-from-the-food-sector-side-of-rice-hold-the-methane [accessed July 2023].
119   WRI (2023). Our world in data: Emissions by sector. World Reesources Institute (WRI). Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector [accessed June 2023].
120   Kurnik, J. and K. Devine (2022). Innovation in reducing methane emissions from the food sector: Side of rice, hold the methane. World Wildlife Fund. Available at: https://www.worldwildlife.org/blogs/sustainability-works/posts/innovation-in-reducing-methane-emissions-from-the-food-sector-side-of-rice-hold-the-methane [accessed July 2023].
121   Umali-Deininger, D. (2022). Greening the rice we eat. Washington, DC: World Bank. available: https://blogs.worldbank.org/eastasiapacific/greening-rice-we-eat?cid=SHR_BlogSiteEmail_EN_EXT.
122   Zhijiang, X. (2023). Chinese rice farming trials cut methane emissions. China Dialogue. Available at: https://chinadialogue.net/en/food/chinas-rice-farming-trials-cut-methane-emissions-and-increase-yields/ [accessed July 2023].
123   Xiaodan, Y. (2022). Rice can also reduce carbon emissions! A low-carbon experiment in the field: How to build a closed loop of technology, cost, and carbon trading? Daily Economic News newspaper. Available at: https://www.nbd.com.cN/Articles/2022-10-21/2505684.html [accessed July 2023].
124   Arunrat, N., et al. (2021). Comparison of GHG emissions and farmers’ profit of large-scale and individual farming in rice production across four regions of Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123945.
125   Li, J., Y. Xin and L. Yuan (2009). Hybrid rice technology development: Ensuring China’s food security, IFPRI discussion paper. Washington, D.C: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Available at: http://www.ifpri.org/publication/hybrid-rice-technology-development.
126   Cornell University (2017). System of rice intensification – SRI methodologies. Cornell University, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Available at: http://sri.ciifad.cornell.edu/aboutsri/methods/index.html [accessed July 2017].
127   Lai, C. (2022). System of rice intensification: A solution to methane emissions and food insecurity. Earth.org. Available at: https://earth.org/system-of-rice-intensification/ [accessed July 2023].
128   Oksen, P. (2023). Climate smart technologies in adaptation – Agriculture – Sustainable Success Stories. Available at: https://sustainablesuccessstories.org/technologies/climate-smart-technolgies-adaptation-agriculture/ [accessed July 2023].
129   IRRI (2021). How to manage water. Rice knowledge bank, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Available at:http://www.knowledgebank.irri.org/step-by-step-production/growth/water-management [accessed July 2023].
130   Anand, S. (2023). Rice acreage down 13% till Aug 5 due to rain shortfall. India Times. Available at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/agriculture/rice-acreage-down-13-till-aug-5-due-to-rain-shortfall/articleshow/93439236.cms [accessed July 2023].
131   IRRI (2019). Alternate wetting and drying. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Available at: https://ghgmitigation.irri.org/mitigation-technologies/alternate-wetting-and-drying [accessed July 2023].
132   Alauddin, M., et al. (2020). Adoption of alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation as a water-saving technology in Bangladesh: Economic and environmental considerations. Land Use Policy, 91, 104430.
133   IRRI (2019). Laser land levelling. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Available at: https://ghgmitigation.irri.org/mitigation-technologies/laser-land-leveling [accessed July 2023].
134   IRRI (2021). How to manage water. Rice knowledge bank, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Available at: http://www.knowledgebank.irri.org/step-by-step-production/growth/water-management [accessed July 2023].
135   Zhijiang, X. (2023). Chinese rice farming trials cut methane emissions. China Dialogue. Available at: https://chinadialogue.net/en/food/chinas-rice-farming-trials-cut-methane-emissions-and-increase-yields/ [accessed July 2023].
136   IRRI (2019). Dry seeded rice. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Available at: https://ghgmitigation.irri.org/mitigation-technologies/dry-seeded-rice [accessed July 2023].
137   Ahmadi, N., et al. (2004). Upland rice for highlands: New varieties and sustainable cropping systems for food security promising prospects for the global challenges of rice production the world will face in the coming years?’ in I. T. A. FAO (ed), Rice in Global Markets and Sustainable Production Systems Conference, Rome, Italy, 12–13 February 2004. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 14 p.
138   Xu, H.-l., et al. (2012). Paddy rice can be cultivated in upland conditions by film mulching to create anaerobic soil conditions. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 10(2), 695–702.
139   Shaohua, C., et al. (2020). Establishment of a novel technology permitting self-sufficient, renewable energy from rice straw in paddy fields. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122721.
140   Kang, M., et al. (2023). On securing continuity of eddy covariance flux time-series after changing the measurement height: Correction for flux differences due to the footprint difference. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 331, 109339.
141   Checherina, P. (2022). Using climate-smart rice to reduce methane emissions from agriculture. Climate & Clean Air Coalition (CCAC) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Available at: https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/news/using-climate-smart-rice-reduce-methane-emissions-agriculture [accessed July 2023].
142   Umali-Deininger, D. (2022). Greening the rice we eat. Washington, DC: World Bank. available: https://blogs.worldbank.org/eastasiapacific/greening-rice-we-eat?cid=SHR_BlogSiteEmail_EN_EXT.143 World Bank (2023). Sustainable agriculture transformation project. World Bank. Available at: https://projects.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/project-detail/P145055 [accessed August 2023].
144   CTCN (2023). From solar farm to table, in Liberia improved solar powered irrigation practices are securing lowland rice production. UN Climate Technology Centre & Network (CTCN). Available at: https://www.ctc-n.org/news/solarfarm-table-liberia-improved-solar-powered-irrigation-practices-are-securing-lowland-rice [accessed October 2023].
145   Ngige, L. (2022). Africa agrifoodtech startups raise $1bn in 5 years, but just 1% of global investment. Agfunder Network. Available at: https://agfundernews.com/africa-agrifoodtech-startups-raise-1bn-in-5-years [accessed October 2023].
146   Trendov, N.M., S. Varas and M. Zeng (2019). Digital technologies in agriculture and rural areas: Status report. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at: https://www.fao.org/3/ca4985en/ca4985en.pdf.
147   Syngenta (2023). Syngenta Group reports record $33.4 billion sales and $5.6 billion EBITDA in 2022. Syngenta Group. Available at: https://www.syngentagroup.com/en/media/syngenta-news/year/2023/syngenta-group-reports-record-334-billion-sales-and-56-billion-ebitda [accessed July 2023].
148   MarketsandMarkets (2023). Agricultural robots market industry analysis: Types, advantages, and forecast. MarketsandMarkets. Available at: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/agricultural-robotmarket-173601759.html [accessed July 2023].
149   MarketsandMarkets (2023). Agriculture drones market share, industry size and growth forecast – 2030. MarketsandMarkets. Available at: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/agriculture-dronesmarket-23709764.html [accessed July 2023].
150   Claver, H. (2023). Agricultural drones market to hit revenue of USD 14,237.6 million by 2033. Future Farming. Available at: https://www.futurefarming.com/tech-in-focus/drones/agricultural-drones-market-to-hit-revenue-of-us-14237-6-million-by-2033/ [accessed August 2023].
151   Ipsos (2019). China’s agriculture drone revolution. Hong Kong: Ipsos Business Consulting. Available at: https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2020-10/china-agriculture-drones.pdf.
152   Citywire (2023). Deere bets the farm on $150bn ‘precision agriculture’ opportunity. Citywire. Available at: https://citywire.com/pro-buyer/news/deere-bets-the-farm-on-150bn-precision-agriculture-opportunity/a2408316 [accessed August 2023].
153   Statistics Denmark (2018). Precision agriculture. Nyt fra Danmarks Statistik, Copenhagen: Statistics Denmark. Available at: https://www.dst.dk/Site/Dst/SingleFiles/GetArchiveFile.aspx?fi=formid&fo=agriculture-2018--pdf&ext.
154   Danmarks Statistik (2022). Stigning i areal med præcisionslandbrug. Nyt fra Danmarks Statistik. Available at: https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/nyheder-analyser-publ/nyt/NytHtml?cid=42525 [accessed August 2023].
155   Brons Group (2023). Local use of precision farming equipment. [Interview], 16 August 2023. Available at: https://bronsgroup.com/.
156   Ipsos (2019). China’s agriculture drone revolution. Hong Kong: Ipsos Business Consulting. Available at: https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2020-10/china-agriculture-drones.pdf.
157   Airbus (2023). To insure grasslands against climate risks, Crédit Agricole Bank uses Airbus’ satellite imagery. Airbus Intelligence. Available at: https://www.intelligence-airbusds.com/newsroom/case-studies/agriculture/creditagricole-uses-satellite-imagery-to-insure-grasslands/#solution [accessed October 2023].
158   DJI Agriculture (2023). Saving up to 95% water, improving efficiency, while saving chemicals: DJI Agras drones benefit farmers in Turkey during drought. DJI Global. Available at: https://ag.dji.com/case-studies/ag-case-en-t30-tr-drought [accessed October 2023].