À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Sensibilisation Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Application Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO ALERT États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center

Alternative Dispute Resolution Proceeding

Accelerated Proceeding

Case No. DSE2019-0031

1. Petitioner

The Petitioner is Klarna Bank AB,Sweden, represented by SILKA Law AB, Sweden.

2. Domain Holder

The Domain Holder is P. I., Bulgaria.

3. Domain Name and Procedural History

This Alternative Dispute Resolution proceeding relates to the domain name <wwwklarna.se>.

This Petition was filed under the Terms and Conditions of registration (the “.se Policy”) and the Instructions governing Alternative Dispute Resolution proceeding for domain names in the top-level domain .se (the “.se Rules”).

The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (“the Center”) verified that the Petition satisfied the formal requirements of the .se Policy and the .se Rules. In accordance with Section 13 of the .se Rules, the Center formally notified the Domain Holder of the Petition on July 31, 2019. The Domain Holder did not submit any response and, accordingly, the Center notified the Domain Holder's default on September 2, 2019.

The Center appointed Johan Sjöbeck as the sole Arbitrator in this matter on September 11, 2019. The Arbitrator has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with Section 1 of the .se Rules.

4. Factual Background

The Petitioner is the owner of a number of trademark registrations including the following:

KLARNA, European Union Trade Mark (EUTM) registration with registration number 009199803 and registration date December 6, 2010;

KLARNA, Swedish trademark with registration number 012656658 and registration date July 30, 2014.

In addition, the Petitioner is the owner of the Swedish trade name Klarna Bank AB with company registration number 556737-0431.

The disputed domain name <wwwklarna.se> was registered by the Domain Holder on March 21, 2019. The Petitioner has requested that the dispute should be decided as Accelerated Proceeding if the Domain Holder does not reply to the Petition.

5. Claim

The Petitioner has requested that the disputed domain name <wwwklarna.se> shall be transferred from the Domain Holder to the Petitioner.

6. Parties’ Contentions

A. Petitioner

The Petitioner, founded in 2005, is one of Europe’s largest banks providing payment solutions for 60 million consumers across 70 000 merchants in 18 countries. The Petitioner offers direct payments, pay after delivery options and installment plans.

Given that the disputed domain name <wwwklarna.se> is a misspelled version of the Petitioner’s trademark KLARNA where the period (“.”) has been omitted after the “www”, the Petitioner argues that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark.

The Petitioner contacted the Domain Holder on April 17, 2019 regarding the disputed domain name. The Domain Holder claimed that since it holds more than 500K domain names it is impossible for the Domain Holder to know if any of its domain names infringe any trademarks. The Domain Holder offered to cancel or transfer the disputed domain name. However, given the administrative burden, the Domain Holder would charge a fee of EUR 80. Again, the Petitioner requested that the Domain Holder should transfer the disputed domain name without any compensation. The request was rejected by the Domain Holder.

The Domain Holder has registered and used the disputed domain name in bad faith. The Domain Holder has had ample time to create a website for a genuine business but has failed to do so. The Domain Holder’s website is a pay-per-click website and is offered for sale. The Domain Holder is not known by the name KLARNA. The word KLARNA is an invented word by the Petitioner and does not exist in any known language. The word does not exist as a trademark registration other than the Petitioner’s own registration.

The Domain Holder has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. The Domain Holder has no authorization or permission to make use of the KLARNA trademark and the Domain Holder is not commonly known by the term that constitutes the disputed domain name.

B. Domain Holder

The Domain Holder has been given the opportunity to respond to the Petition, but have not provided any response.

7. Discussion and Findings

A domain name may, in accordance with the .se Policy paragraph 7.2, be deregistered or transferred to the party requesting dispute resolution proceedings if all of the following three conditions are fulfilled:

1. The disputed domain name is identical or similar to a name which is legally recognized in Sweden and to which the party requesting dispute resolution can prove its rights, and

2. The disputed domain name has been registered or used in bad faith, and

3. The Domain Holder has no rights or justified interest in the disputed domain name.

All three conditions must be met in order for a petitioner to succeed in its action.

A. The disputed domain name is identical or similar to a name which is legally recognized in Sweden and to which the Petitioner can prove its rights

The Petitioner is the owner of the EUTM registration KLARNA with registration number 009199803 dated 2010 and the Swedish registration KLARNA with registration number 012656658 dated 2014. The Arbitrator finds that the disputed domain name <wwwklarna.se> is similar to the Petitioner’s trademarks.

B. The disputed domain name has been registered or used in bad faith

The evidence in the case before the Arbitrator indicates that the disputed domain name <wwwklarna.se> has been registered with the Petitioner’s trademark and business in mind. There is no evidence in the case file that refutes the Petitioner’s submissions. The Arbitrator therefore concludes that the disputed domain name has been registered and used in bad faith.

C. The Domain Holder has no rights or justified interest in the disputed domain name.

The Domain Holder has not submitted any reply to the Petition and there is nothing in the case indicating that the Domain Holder has a right or justified interest in the disputed domain name. Consequently, the Arbitrator therefore concludes that the Domain Holder has no right or justified interest in the disputed domain name.

8. Decision

The disputed domain name <wwwklarna.se> shall be transferred to the Petitioner.

Johan Sjöbeck
Date: September 13, 2019

https://www3.wipo.int/contact/fr/area.jsp?area=arbitration https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/fr/ https://www.wipo.int/tools/fr/disclaim.html https://www.wipo.int/fr/web/privacy-policy/ https://www.wipo.int/fr/web/accessibility/ https://www.wipo.int/tools/fr/sitemap.html https://www3.wipo.int/newsletters/fr/ https://www.wipo.int/podcasts/fr/ https://www.wipo.int/news/fr/