Domain Name for years. The Domain Name is similar to the well-known trademark. The Respondent’s registration and use of the Domain Name is typosquatting...like a classic case of typosquatting. Typosquatting is not legitimate use of a trademark. The Panel finds that the Complainant has made out a prima facie...
2019-05-24 - Informations relatives au litige
“typosquatting”. Though the Panel would not choose that term to describe the Respondent’s conduct in this case, the issue is a technical one, not outcome...determinative. The term “typosquatting”—as a portmanteau of “typographical error” and “cybersquatting”—presumes an opportunistic act on the part of a domain name...
2016-09-30 - Informations relatives au litige
confusion on the Internet for commercial gain and disrupting the Complainant’s business. Typosquatting is registration and use in bad faith per se. B...typosquatting registration. Typosquatting is also an indication of a lack of rights or legitimate interests. The Respondent has not answered this Complaint or...
2021-12-02 - Informations relatives au litige
is an example of typosquatting in order to disrupt the business of a legitimate trademark owner. The Complainant argues that the Respondent has not...practice of typosquatting, of itself, is evidence of bad faith, and the use of a proxy server to hide the identity of a registrant, when done in combination...
2019-10-28 - Informations relatives au litige
United States for computer software since 1985. It owns . The Domain Name registered in 2008 is a typosquatting registration and confusingly similar to the...offering of goods or services or a noncommercial legitimate or fair use. Typosquatting is redirecting customers looking for the Complainant who misspell the...
2019-09-12 - Informations relatives au litige
typosquatting; that Respondent lacks any right or legitimate interest in the Disputed Domain Name; and that the Disputed Domain Name was registered and used in...typosquatting that relies on an easy keyboard mistake in substituting the letter “I” for the adjacent letter “U” on a qwerty keyboard. The Panel finds in favor of...
2013-05-31 - Informations relatives au litige
Complainant Complainant contends that the Disputed Domain Name is an example of typosquatting; that Respondent lacks any right or legitimate interest in the...of typosquatting that relies on an easy keyboard mistake in substituting the letter “y” for the adjacent letter “t” on a qwerty keyboard. The Panel...
2013-05-31 - Informations relatives au litige
letter “i” does not eliminate the fact that the Complainant’s trademark remains recognizable. This is a case of typosquatting. The generic Top-Level Domain...Complainant’s trademark EQUINOR with a typo by adding the letter “i”. This is a typical case of typosquatting, which is designed to confuse users (Redbox...
2023-06-21 - Informations relatives au litige
the UDRP Complaint does not point to an active web site. The Domain Name is a typosquatting registration differing from the Complainant’s domain name...privacy shield had been removed). There is no bona fide offering of goods or services or legitimate noncommercial or fair use. Typosquatting is bad faith...
2022-10-10 - Informations relatives au litige
“typosquatting”. No rights or legitimate interests According to Complainant, Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name. Respondent does...traffic which is intended for Complainant. It is established case law that typosquatting constitutes unfair use and is the opposite of a legitimate...
2015-07-22 - Informations relatives au litige
case of typosquatting. The disputed domain name and the Complainant’s mark NATIXIS are both composed of seven letters. Moreover they have 6 identical...similar to the Complainant’s mark NATIXIS and represents a clear case of typosquatting in the sense of WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP...
2019-04-25 - Informations relatives au litige
information. The Respondent’s registration of the disputed domain name amounts is an example of typosquatting. The Respondent has made no use of the disputed...registration of the disputed domain name presents as a classic case of typosquatting. The disputed domain name is nearly identical and/or confusingly similar to...
2019-04-12 - Informations relatives au litige
registration of the disputed domain name is a classic case of typosquatting. The Respondent has made no active use of the disputed domain name. The disputed...presents as a classic case of typosquatting. The disputed domain name is nearly identical and/or confusingly similar to the TOMMY BAHAMA trademark, as well...
2019-04-12 - Informations relatives au litige
typosquatting. See RX America, L.L.C. v. Tony Rodolakis, WIPO Case No. D2005-1190 . The practice of typosquatting intentionally takes advantage of Internet users...similar by design. See RX America, L.L.C. v. Tony Rodolakis, supra (referring to intentional misspellings as "typosquatting", which "has consistently been...
2016-11-17 - Informations relatives au litige
confusingly similar to its referenced trademarks. Complainant states that this is a case of “typosquatting”, as the referenced marks are included and...recognizable in the Domain Name with the exception of the deletion of the letter “o” from the term “zions”. Respondent has engaged in such “typosquatting” to...
2017-06-15 - Informations relatives au litige
typosquatting. Rights or Legitimate Interest The Complainant submits that the Respondent is not using the Disputed Domain Name to offer bona fide goods or...the registration of a typosquatting domain name is itself evidence of bad faith; and iv) the Respondent has a history of typosquatting. B. Respondent...
2011-02-07 - Informations relatives au litige
Respondent is engaged in “typosquatting”, a practice which consists of a registration which is only a slight variation of a legitimate mark. The Complainant...makes the very same arguments for the other two Disputed Domain Names which contain a mistaken letter which constitutes this same “typosquatting” and the...
2010-07-27 - Informations relatives au litige
is a classic case of typosquatting, as the disputed domain name is a slight misspelling of Complainant’s trademark. Here, other than adding the gTLD...“.com” the only difference between Complainant’s mark and the disputed domain name is Respondent’s replacing the final “o” with an “e.” 4 Typosquatting is...
2010-12-17 - Informations relatives au litige
constitutes “typosquatting” and is fraudulent so that the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply...by the evidence of the Respondent’s “typosquatting” activities, which constitute prima facie evidence of confusion as it demonstrates an intent on the...
2021-03-31 - Informations relatives au litige
of the Domain Name. On the contrary, the Complainant asserts that the Respondent by registering the Domain Name is engaged in “typosquatting” and...the Complainant’s MICHELIN trademark registrations predate the registration date of the Domain Name. The Domain Name constitutes a typosquatting variant...
2022-01-28 - Informations relatives au litige