Complainant
The Complainant contends that the Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Trade Mark, that the
Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests with respect to the Domain Names, and that the Domain
Names were registered and are being used in bad faith. ...In all the circumstances, the Panel determines that English be the language of
the proceeding.
C. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has established that it has rights to the Trade Mark.
...
2022-10-11 - Datos del caso
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2006/d2006-0334.html
page 4
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The first element that the Complainant must establish is that the Domain Names are identical or confusingly
similar to the trademark in which the Complainant has rights.
...Discussion and Findings
A. Language of the Proceeding
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
C. Rights or Legitimate Interests
D. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-10-06 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel accepts that the Complainant has rights in the Complainant’s Trademark based on various
trademark registrations listed above in Section 4. ...It is well established that in making an enquiry as to whether a trademark is identical or confusingly similar to
a domain name, the Top-Level Domain (“TLD”) extension, “.co” in this case, may be disregarded. ...
2022-09-28 - Datos del caso
Therefore, the Panel finds that the Complainant has proven that the disputed domain name is confusingly
similar to the Complainant’s mark. Therefore, the first element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is met.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-11-21 - Datos del caso
Hence, this Panel finds that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the
Complainant’s trademark GROUPE LE DUFF pursuant to the Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i).
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-12-22 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel accepts that the Complainant has rights in the Complainant’s Trademark based on the various
trademark registrations listed above in Section 4.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-12-20 - Datos del caso
The failure of the Complainant to prove any one of these elements means the
Complaint must be denied.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel accepts that the Complainant is the owner of, and therefore has rights in, the Mark.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-09-26 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has produced sufficient evidence to demonstrate that it has registered trademark rights in
the mark TAYLOR WESSING in numerous jurisdictions. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-12-29 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has established rights over the trademark EQUIFAX based on the
trademark registrations cited under section 4 above.
...Therefore, the Panel finds that the Complainant has proven that the disputed domain name is confusingly
similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has established rights according to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the
Policy.
...
2022-12-23 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires the Complainant to show that the disputed domain name is identical
or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights.
...The Panel is satisfied that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark and
the Complainant has satisfied the requirement of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2022-12-23 - Datos del caso
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 4
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The first element that the Complainant must establish is that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly
similar to the trademark in which the Complainant has rights.
...Respondent
7. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
D. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
8. Decision...
2022-10-27 - Datos del caso
Thus, taking these circumstances into account, the Panel finds that it is appropriate to exercise its discretion
and allow the proceeding to be conducted in English.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The first element that the Complainant must establish is that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly
similar to the trademark in which the Complainant has rights.
...Given the above, the Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s
trademark. Thus, the Complainant has proved the requirements under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2022-10-27 - Datos del caso
The Panel concludes that the Domain Name is clearly confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark.
Precisely in relation to the domain names consisting of a misspelling of a complainant’s trademark (i.e.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-10-26 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant, under the first requirement of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, needs to establish that the
disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or a service mark in which it has
rights.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-10-25 - Datos del caso
UDRP panels have
consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to a
famous or widely-known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of bad faith on
the part of Respondent. ...Nick Roskam, Elite Domains LLC / Tinh Nguyen
Case No. D2022-2808
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith...
2022-11-01 - Datos del caso
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has established that it has rights to the Trade Mark.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
C. Rights or Legitimate Interests
D. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-09-09 - Datos del caso
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Mark, and that the inversion of
the “gcf” and “groupe” elements does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity, because the Mark remains
recognizable within the disputed domain name. ...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
As noted above, the Respondent has failed to provide any exculpatory information or persuasive reasoning
that might have led the Panel to question the Complainant’s arguments that the Respondent acted in bad
faith by creating confusion to the detriment of the Complainant in registering and using the disputed domain
name, confusingly similar to the Mark.
First, the registration of a domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark by an entity that has no
relationship to that mark may be, depending on the circumstances, evidence of opportunistic bad faith. ...
2022-09-07 - Datos del caso
The Panel will therefore proceed to analyze whether the three elements of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy are
satisfied.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, the Complainant must establish rights in a trademark or service
mark and secondly establish that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark
in which the Complainant has rights.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-12-16 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel accepts that the Complainant has rights in the Complainant’s Trademark, based on its various
trademark registrations listed above in Section 4.
...As such, the Panel finds that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s
Trademark, and accordingly, paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy is satisfied.
...
2022-08-31 - Datos del caso
In all the circumstances, the
Panel determines that English be the language of the proceeding.
C. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has established that it has registered rights to the Trade Mark.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
C. Identical or Confusingly Similar
D. Rights or Legitimate Interests
E. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-07-21 - Datos del caso