Propiedad intelectual Formación en PI Divulgación de la PI La PI para... La PI y… La PI en… Información sobre patentes y tecnología Información sobre marcas Información sobre diseños industriales Información sobre las indicaciones geográficas Información sobre las variedades vegetales (UPOV) Leyes, tratados y sentencias de PI Recursos de PI Informes sobre PI Protección por patente Protección de las marcas Protección de diseños industriales Protección de las indicaciones geográficas Protección de las variedades vegetales (UPOV) Solución de controversias en materia de PI Soluciones operativas para las oficinas de PI Pagar por servicios de PI Negociación y toma de decisiones Cooperación para el desarrollo Apoyo a la innovación Colaboraciones público-privadas La Organización Trabajar con la OMPI Rendición de cuentas Patentes Marcas Diseños industriales Indicaciones geográficas Derecho de autor Secretos comerciales Academia de la OMPI Talleres y seminarios Día Mundial de la PI Revista de la OMPI Sensibilización Casos prácticos y casos de éxito Novedades sobre la PI Premios de la OMPI Empresas Universidades Pueblos indígenas Judicatura Recursos genéticos, conocimientos tradicionales y expresiones culturales tradicionales Economía Igualdad de género Salud mundial Cambio climático Política de competencia Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible Observancia de los derechos Tecnologías de vanguardia Aplicaciones móviles Deportes Turismo PATENTSCOPE Análisis de patentes Clasificación Internacional de Patentes ARDI - Investigación para la innovación ASPI - Información especializada sobre patentes Base Mundial de Datos sobre Marcas Madrid Monitor Base de datos Artículo 6ter Express Clasificación de Niza Clasificación de Viena Base Mundial de Datos sobre Dibujos y Modelos Boletín de Dibujos y Modelos Internacionales Base de datos Hague Express Clasificación de Locarno Base de datos Lisbon Express Base Mundial de Datos sobre Marcas para indicaciones geográficas Base de datos de variedades vegetales PLUTO Base de datos GENIE Tratados administrados por la OMPI WIPO Lex: leyes, tratados y sentencias de PI Normas técnicas de la OMPI Estadísticas de PI WIPO Pearl (terminología) Publicaciones de la OMPI Perfiles nacionales sobre PI Centro de Conocimiento de la OMPI Informes de la OMPI sobre tendencias tecnológicas Índice Mundial de Innovación Informe mundial sobre la propiedad intelectual PCT - El sistema internacional de patentes ePCT Budapest - El Sistema internacional de depósito de microorganismos Madrid - El sistema internacional de marcas eMadrid Artículo 6ter (escudos de armas, banderas, emblemas de Estado) La Haya - Sistema internacional de diseños eHague Lisboa - Sistema internacional de indicaciones geográficas eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediación Arbitraje Determinación de expertos Disputas sobre nombres de dominio Acceso centralizado a la búsqueda y el examen (CASE) Servicio de acceso digital (DAS) WIPO Pay Cuenta corriente en la OMPI Asambleas de la OMPI Comités permanentes Calendario de reuniones Documentos oficiales de la OMPI Agenda para el Desarrollo Asistencia técnica Instituciones de formación en PI Apoyo para COVID-19 Estrategias nacionales de PI Asesoramiento sobre políticas y legislación Centro de cooperación Centros de apoyo a la tecnología y la innovación (CATI) Transferencia de tecnología Programa de Asistencia a los Inventores (PAI) WIPO GREEN PAT-INFORMED de la OMPI Consorcio de Libros Accesibles Consorcio de la OMPI para los Creadores WIPO ALERT Estados miembros Observadores Director general Actividades por unidad Oficinas en el exterior Ofertas de empleo Adquisiciones Resultados y presupuesto Información financiera Supervisión

Búsqueda de textos completos de las resoluciones de los Grupos de Expertos de la OMPI

Encontrado 57807   documento(s)s (0.039 sec)

Filas

<<  <  3141 - 3160  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-2024 for pearljamchicago.com, pearljamtickets.org, pearljamtour2016.com, pearljamtourtickets.com html (16 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Under the first UDRP element, a complainant is required to prove that a disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights. ...First, the registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark by an entity that has no relationship to that mark may be sufficient evidence of bad faith. ...

2018-11-02 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1959 for amegybankl.com html (16 KB)

However, the Panel may draw appropriate inferences from the Respondent’s default. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy provides that the Complainant must establish that the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark. ...A domain name which consists of a common, obvious, or intentional misspelling of a trade mark is considered by panels to be confusingly similar to the relevant mark for purposes of the first element. The Panel considers that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark and that this is clear case of typosquatting. ...

2018-10-31 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-2713 for chatroulette-deutsch.com html (15 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has satisfactorily proven that it has registered trademark rights for CHATROULETTE. ...D2001-0110, stating “The incorporation of a Complainant’s well-known trademark in the registered Domain Name is considered sufficient to find the Domain Name confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark”. Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Complainant has satisfied the first requirement that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark, under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. ...

2019-01-18 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1616 for bashboutiqueshop.com html (17 KB)

Furthermore, it is well established that the addition of descriptive terms does not prevent a disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to complainant’s trademarks (see section 1.8 of the WIPO Overview 3.0, Reuters Limited v. ...Therefore, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademarks. Complainant has therefore satisfied paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. ...

2019-08-22 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1306 for bitfuryonline.com html (16 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, there are two requirements which the Complainant must establish, first that it has rights in a trademark or service mark, and second that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark or service mark. ...On the basis of facts and circumstances discussed above the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s BITFURY trademark and that the requirement of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy is satisfied. ...

2019-08-20 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-0607 for lanvinbridal.com html (15 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar This element consists of two parts: first, does the Complainant have rights in a relevant trademark and, second, is the Disputed Domain Name identical or confusingly similar to that trademark. ...It is well established that a domain name that wholly incorporates a trademark may be confusingly similar to that trademark for purposes of the Policy despite the addition of a descriptive or generic word. ...

2019-05-03 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-0425 for consep.com html (16 KB)

In light of these circumstances, the Panel concludes that it will (1) accept the Complaint in English; and (2) issue a decision in English. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar This element consists of two parts; first, whether the Complainant has rights in a relevant trademark and, second, whether the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to that trademark. ...The Respondent created the disputed domain name which is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark CONSEP with the knowledge of the Complainant’s famous trademarks and its business. ...

2019-05-17 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-0732 for iqosevim.com html (16 KB)

Having considered the Complaint and the available evidence, the Panel finds the following: A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires a two-fold enquiry – a threshold investigation into whether a complainant has rights in a trade mark, followed by an assessment of whether the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the trade mark. ...For the purposes of comparing the disputed domain name with the Trade Mark, the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) “.com” can be disregarded.2 The Complainant’s submission is that “[A] domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark, when the domain name includes the trademark, or a confusingly similar approximation, regardless of the other terms in the domain name.” ...

2019-05-17 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1767 for hmfranchise.com html (17 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, there are two requirements which the Complainant must establish, first that it has rights in a trademark or service mark, and second that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark or service mark. ...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s HM and H&M trademark and that the requirement of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy is satisfied. ...

2019-09-10 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-0984 for com-accorhotels.com html (15 KB)

The Domain Name reproduces entirely the Trademark. Thus, the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Trademark. The addition of the term “com” connected by a hyphen is insufficient to avoid any likelihood of confusion. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant must demonstrate that it has rights in a trademark or service mark and, if so, the Domain Name must be shown to be identical or confusingly similar to that mark. ...

2019-06-13 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-0724 for royalunlbrew.com html (17 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, there are two requirements which the Complainant must establish, first that it has rights in a trademark or service mark, and second that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark or service mark. ...On the basis of facts and circumstances discussed above the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s ROYAL UNIBREW trademark and that the requirement of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy is satisfied. ...

2019-06-13 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-0867 for contact-ets.org html (15 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel accepts that the Complainant has established registered in it ETS trademark. ...The Panel also accepts that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s ETS trademark, in which it has rights. It is well established that the addition of the generic Top-Level Domain “.org” does not avoid a finding that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark, in this case the Complainant’s ETS trademark. ...

2019-06-11 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-0980 for descovyforprep.com html (16 KB)

Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has satisfactorily proven that it has registered trademark rights for DESCOVY. ...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Complainant has satisfied the first requirement that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark, under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. B. ...

2019-06-25 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-2057 for altriatotalreward.com html (16 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel concludes that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the ALTRIA Mark as set forth below. ...It is well established that a domain name that wholly incorporates a trademark may be confusingly similar to that trademark for purposes of the Policy despite the addition of a descriptive or dictionary word. ...

2019-10-11 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1554 for subsae7.com html (14 KB)

The Panel may draw appropriate inferences from the available evidence submitted by the Complainant. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar To prove this element, the Complainant must have trademark rights and the disputed domain name must be identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. ...Previous UDRP panels have held that the Top-Level Domain “.com” is not to be taken into account when assessing whether a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark. In the light of the foregoing, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark and that paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy is satisfied. ...

2019-08-28 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0413 for instograhm.com html (16 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar This element consists of two parts: first, does the Complainant have rights in a relevant trademark and, second, is the Disputed Domain Name identical or confusingly similar to that trademark. ...See WIPO Overview 3.0, at section 1.9 (“A domain name which consists of a common, obvious, or intentional misspelling of a trademark is considered by panels to be confusingly similar to the relevant mark for purposes of the first element.”); see also Express Scripts, Inc. v. ...

2021-06-08 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0128 for accelachern.com html (15 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel concludes the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the ACCELA trademark. ...That in the Panel’s opinion produces a result which is confusingly similar to the trademark, and indeed it is clear that was the Respondent’s intention. It is also well established that the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”), in this case “.com”, does not affect the Disputed Domain Name for the purpose of determining whether it is identical or confusingly similar. ...

2021-05-25 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0825 for likesonlyfans.com html (16 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel accepts that the Complainant has registered rights in the ONLYFANS trade mark based on its various trade mark registrations. ...As such, the Panel finds that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s ONLYFANS trade mark, and accordingly, paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy is satisfied. ...

2021-05-19 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-0506 for eletcrolux.com html (16 KB)

Respondent takes advantage of the ELECTROLUX trademark by using a confusingly similar domain name to send fraudulent emails, portraying itself to be Complainant and extracting payments from Complainant’s customers. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the domain name of Complainant’s official website and the only difference is the placement of the letters “t” and “c” in the disputed domain name. ...

2020-05-13 - Datos del caso

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1107 for carrefoursolucoesfinanceiras.com html (17 KB)

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the UDRP, the Complainant must prove that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. ...Here, the Respondent registered domain names confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark on multiple occasions. Carrefour v. Perfect Privacy, LLC / Milen Radumilo, WIPO Case No. ...

2020-06-19 - Datos del caso