About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Biennial IFCAI Conference

October 24, 1997, Geneva, Switzerland

 

The Recent Revision of CIETAC Arbitration Rules
Professor Tang Houzhi
Vice-Chairman, China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
(Beijing, China)


The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) promulgated its first set of arbitration rules in 1956. Since then, the rules have been revised three times. The first revision was done in 1989, the second revision in 1994 and the third revision (the recent revision) in 1995.

The general approaches in and the reasons for the revisions are to keep modernizing and internationalizing the CIETAC rules, ensuring parties’ autonomy and serving the arbitration users better.

On August 31, 1994, China promulgated a new Arbitration Law which came into effect on September 1, 1995.

In order to align them with the terms of the new Arbitration Law, the CIETAC arbitration rules were revised in 1995. The revised CIETAC arbitration rules were effective as from October 1, 1995.

There are not many changes in the rules. The important changes are as follows:

a) The original rules stipulate that CIETAC has the power to decide on the existence and validity of an arbitration agreement (arbitration clause) and on the jurisdictions over an arbitration case. Now the revised rules provide that CIETAC has the power to decide on the existence and validity of an arbitration agreement (arbitration clause) and the jurisdiction over an arbitration case; but, if one party challenges the validity of the arbitration agreement (arbitration clause) and requests CIETAC to make a decision thereupon and the other party applies to the People’s court for a ruling, the latter’s ruling shall prevail.

b) The original rules stipulate that the presiding arbitrator in an arbitration tribunal shall be appointed by the chairman of CIETAC. Now the revised rules provide that the presiding arbitrator shall be appointed by the parties jointly; if the parties fail to appoint the presiding arbitrator, the chairman of CIETAC shall make such appointment.

c) The arbitrators shall submit their arbitral award to CIETAC before they sign their names on it. CIETAC may remind the arbitrators of any issues relating to the form of the arbitral award on condition that the arbitrators’ independence is not affected.

CIETAC is considering further amendment of its rules, with a view to keeping pace with the rapid development of international commercial arbitration towards "globalization" and "harmonization."

 

Back to Biennial IFCAI Conference Index