About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center

Alternative Dispute Resolution Proceeding

Accelerated Proceeding

Case No. DSE2018-0038

1. Petitioner

The Petitioners are “Dr. Martens” International Trading GmbH and “Dr. Maertens” Marketing GmbH (hereinafter referred to as the “Petitioner”), both of Germany, represented by Beetz & Partner, Germany.

2. Domain Holder

The Domain Holder is E. F. of Germany.

3. Domain Name and Procedural History

This Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) proceeding relates to the disputed domain name <drmartensboots.se>.

On June 12, 2018, the Petitioner filed for a dispute resolution for the domain name <drmartensboots.se> requesting that it be transferred to the Petitioner and that, if there was no response by the Domain Holder to the Petition, the matter would be determined by ADR Accelerated Proceeding.

The Petition was filed under the Terms and Conditions of registration (the “.se Policy”) and the Instructions governing Alternative Dispute Resolution proceeding for domain names in the top-level domain .se (the “.se Rules”).

The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) verified that the Petition satisfied the formal requirements of the .se Policy and the .se Rules. In accordance with Section 13 of the .se Rules, the Center formally notified the Domain Holder of the Petition on June 26, 2018. The Domain Holder did not submit any response and, accordingly, the Center notified the Domain Holder's default on July 27, 2018.

The Center appointed Gunnar Karnell as the sole Arbitrator in this matter on August 10, 2018. The Arbitrator has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with Section 1 of the .se Rules.

4. Factual Background

The Petitioner refers in support of its claim in this proceeding, in particular to its exclusively owned European Union Trade Marks DR. MARTENS (No. 59147) registered on March 3, 1999 for various goods, including footwear and clothing in class 25, and DR. MARTENS (No. 2572071), registered on June 27, 2003 for retail services etc. in relation to footwear in class 35.

The Domain Holder registered the disputed domain name <drmartensboots.se> on October 31, 2017.

The Petitioner has adduced:

The disputed domain name is highly similar to the Petitioner’s well known trade mark DR. MARTENS, registered in many countries all over the world, used to market footwear, clothing and accessories and mirrored online at the “Dr. Martens” own website located at “www.drmartens.com”. Differences between the disputed domain name and trade marks here mentioned do not prevent the likelihood of confusion in the minds of Internet users.

The Domain Holder uses the disputed domain name for an online shop, selling footwear and accessories with “Dr. Martens” marked products. By means of its domain name the Domain Holder takes unfair advantage of, and is detrimental to, the Petitioner’s earlier rights, causing confusion as to the identity of the entity behind the website connected to the disputed domain name. The Domain Holder must have been aware of the Petitioner’s rights to the DR. MARTENS trade mark rights registrations when registering the disputed domain name, implicating bad faith registration.

The disputed domain name is used by the Domain Holder on its website “www.drmartensboots.se” in such a manner that it takes advantage of, and is detrimental to, the Petitioner’s earlier rights, not having any rights or justified interest in the disputed domain name, never having been authorized to use the Petitioner’s trade marks for its website or else for commercial use or to tarnish it as the case may be.

5. Claim

The Petitioner claims that the disputed domain name <drmartensboots.se> shall be transferred to “Dr. Martens” International Trading GmbH.

6. Brief findings of the Arbitrator

The Petitioner has proven that it holds such entitlement as defined in Section 7.2.1 of the .se Policy which is identical or similar to the disputed domain name <drmartensboots.se>.

The Petitioner has proven that the disputed domain name was registered or used by the Domain Holder in bad faith.

Circumstances in support of a right or justified interest to the disputed domain name for the Domain Holder have not been demonstrated.

7. Decision

The disputed domain name <drmartensboots.se> shall be transferred to the Petitioner “Dr. Martens” International Trading GmbH.

Gunnar Karnell
Date: August 20, 2018