The Complainant filed supplemental filings on March 29, 2022, and the Respondent filed supplemental filings
on April 15, 2022.
The Center appointed John Swinson, Stephanie G. Hartung, and Diane Cabell as panelists in this matter on
April 25, 2022. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...
2022-05-19 - Case Details
On January 9, 2001, the parties were notified that Mr. Swinson had been appointed as the sole panelist and that a decision was to be handed down by January 24, 2001 (save exceptional circumstances).
...Decision
For the reasons set forth above and pursuant to Paragraph 4(i) of the ICANN
Policy and 14 of the ICANN Rules, the Panel orders that the contested domain
name be transferred to Complainant Dain Rauscher
Corporation.
John Swinson
Sole Panelist
Dated: February 14, 2002...
2002-02-26 - Case Details
The Response was filed with the Center March 9, 2018.
The Center appointed John Swinson, David E. Sorkin and Nick J. Gardner as panelists in this matter on April 18, 2018. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...The Complaint is denied as to the Disputed Domain Name .
John Swinson
Presiding Panelist
David E. Sorkin
Panelist
Nick J. Gardner
Panelist
Date: May 1, 2018...
2018-05-09 - Case Details
The Response was filed with the Center on March 25, 2021 by the current Respondent.
The Center appointed John Swinson, Tobias Malte Müller and The Hon Neil Brown Q.C. as panelists in this matter on May 5, 2021. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
John Swinson
Presiding Panelist
Tobias Malte Müller
Panelist
The Hon Neil Brown Q.C.
Panelist
Date: May 25, 2021
1 Note added by Panelist Brown: Panelist Brown agrees with the overall result and the order for transfer in this case because of the unique circumstances of this case which have been revealed by the evidence and only because of those unique circumstances. ...
2021-06-02 - Case Details
The Complainant submitted a supplemental filing on September 24, 2020 (the “Supplemental Filing”).
The Center appointed John Swinson as the sole panelist in this matter on October 2, 2020. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, the Complaint is denied.
John Swinson
Sole Panelist
Date: October 27, 2020...
2020-11-06 - Case Details
The Response was submitted on November 14, 2020, and the Respondent filed an amended Response on November 16, 2020.
The Center appointed John Swinson as the sole panelist in this matter on November 19, 2020. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, the Complaint is denied.
John Swinson
Sole Panelist
Date: December 4, 2020...
2020-12-08 - Case Details
The Response was filed with the Center on July 9, 2011.
The Center appointed John Swinson as the sole panelist in this matter on July 25, 2011. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain names , , and be transferred to the Complainant.
John Swinson
Sole Panelist
Dated: August 9, 2011...
2011-09-01 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified Respondent’s default on May 6, 2011.
The Center appointed Ross Carson, John Swinson and Rodrigo Velasco Santelices as panelists in this matter on May 20, 2011. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
Ross Carson
Presiding Panelist
John Swinson
Panelist
Rodrigo Velasco Santelices
Panelist
Dated: June 2, 2011...
2011-06-30 - Case Details
The Response was filed with the Center on December 24, 2008.
The Center appointed John Swinson as the sole panelist in this matter on January 15, 2009. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, the Complaint is denied.
John Swinson
Sole Panelist
Dated: January 30, 2009...
2009-02-18 - Case Details
The Response was received by the Center one day after it was due.
The Center appointed John Swinson as the sole panelist in this matter on January 10, 2003. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted.
...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with Paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name, be transferred to the Complainant.
John Swinson
Sole Panelist
Dated: January 26, 2003...
2003-02-03 - Case Details
The Response was filed with the Center on November 5, 2021.
The Center appointed John Swinson as the sole panelist in this matter on November 12, 2021. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
John Swinson
Sole Panelist
Date: November 26, 2021...
2021-12-08 - Case Details
The Center appointed Andrew F. Christie, The Hon Neil Brown Q.C., and John Swinson as panelists in this matter on September 8, 2020. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Christie
Presiding Panelist
The Hon Neil Brown Q.C.
Panelist
John Swinson
Panelist
Date: October 9, 2020
Peachbulk Pty Ltd v. Domain Boutique Pty Ltd
WIPO Case DAU2020-0013
Dissent. ...
2020-11-06 - Case Details
Decision
For the reasons set forth above and pursuant to Paragraph 4(i) of the ICANN Policy and paragraph 15 of the ICANN Rules, the Panel orders that the contested domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
John Swinson
Sole Panelist
Dated: February 27, 2002...
2002-03-06 - Case Details
The Response was filed with the Center on July 6, 2011.
The Center appointed John Swinson as the sole panelist in this matter on July 12, 2011. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name, be transferred to the First Complainant.
John Swinson
Sole Panelist
Dated: July 27, 2011
1 The name of the Respondent in the Complaint and the reply to the Request for Registrar Verification is Daniel Stanojevic, but the name in the Response is Danijel Stanojevic....
2011-08-04 - Case Details
Decision
For the reasons set forth above and pursuant to Paragraph 4(i) of the ICANN Policy and paragraph 15 of the ICANN Rules, the Panel orders that the contested domain names , , and be transferred to the Complainant.
John Swinson
Sole Panelist
Dated: February 27, 2002...
2002-03-06 - Case Details
The Panel finds that the Respondent has registered and is using the domain
names in question in bad faith, in accordance with the ICANN Policy.
7.Decision
For the reasons set forth above and pursuant to Paragraph 4(i) of the ICANN
Policy and Paragraph 15 of the ICANN Rules, the Panel orders that the contested
domain names , and
be transferred to the Complainant.
John Swinson
Sole Panelist
Dated: April 22, 2002...
2002-04-25 - Case Details
On September 24, 2001, the parties were notified that Mr. Swinson had been appointed as the sole panelist and that a decision was to be handed down by October 8, 2001 (save exceptional circumstances).
...Decision
For the reasons set forth above and pursuant to Paragraph 4(i) of the ICANN Policy and 14 of the ICANN Rules, the Panel orders that the contested domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
John Swinson
Sole Panelist
Dated: October 8, 2001...
2001-10-15 - Case Details
The Response was filed with the Center on December 26, 2010.
The Center appointed John Swinson, Andrew F. Christie and Frederick M. Abbott as panelists in this matter on January 20, 2011. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, the Complaint is denied.
John Swinson
Presiding Panelist
Andrew F. Christie
Panelist (Dissenting)
Frederick M. Abbott
Panelist
Dated: March 1, 2011
Dissenting Opinion
I disagree with the majority’s finding that the Complainant has failed to establish that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2011-03-04 - Case Details
The Respondent requested the opportunity to file a Sur-Reply on June 10, 2008 and requested that it be granted a period of 10 days for preparing and filing its Sur-Reply, if the request were to be granted.
The Center appointed John Swinson, David H. Bernstein and David E. Sorkin as panelists in this matter on June 24, 2008. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraph 4(i) of the Policy and paragraph 15 of the Rules, the majority of the Panel orders that the domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
John Swinson
Presiding Panelist
David H. Bernstein
Panelist
David E. Sorkin
Panelist (Dissenting)
Dated: July 29, 2008
DISSENT
I respectfully dissent, on the ground that I do not believe the Complainant has sustained its burden of proving that the disputed domain name was registered in bad faith. ...
2008-08-04 - Case Details
The Panel accepts these Supplemental Filings for its consideration.
The Center appointed John Swinson, Stefan Naumann and The Hon. Neil Brown QC as panelists in this matter on August 31, 2010. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
John Swinson
Presiding Panelist
Stefan Naumann
Panelist
The Hon. Neil Brown QC
Panelist (Dissenting)
Dated: October 22, 2010
Dissenting Opinion
Identical or Confusingly Similar
As a matter of formality, it should first be said that the evidence adduced by the Complainant of the trademarks it relies on is hardly satisfactory.
...
2010-10-25 - Case Details