The Complainant has made substantial investments to develop a strong presence online by being active on social-media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter and having its own different mobile applications. The Complainant operates different domain names reflecting its E LECLERC Trademark for sale and promotion of its goods: , , , , .
...
2020-12-14 - Case Details
It is asserted that, currently, RED BULL has more than 28.9 million fans on Facebook and in 2010 Red bull Videos received more than 102.9 million views on Youtube. Extensive details of the Complainant’s sale and promotion of the RED BULL product are contained in the affidavit of Dr. ...
2013-01-31 - Case Details
The trademark GUCCI is supported by intensive advertising campaigns worldwide, with campaigns appearing in international magazines with broad circulation such as Vogue, Vanity Fair, GQ and Glamour and a strong presence online through popular social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and FourSquare. Consequently, the Complainant enjoys a worldwide reputation and goodwill as one of the leading manufacturers of luxury fashion products.
...
2013-01-15 - Case Details
Further, the evidence indicates that the Respondent is engaged in a persistent practice of typosquatting in relation to the distinctive trademarks of others, including (WALGREENS), (FACEBOOK), and (NORDSTROM).4
In view of the foregoing, the Respondent’s use of the disputed domain names to generate pay-per-click advertising revenues does not qualify as a bona fide offering of goods or services within the meaning of paragraph 4(c)(i) of the Policy. ...
2011-11-01 - Case Details
La omisión de alegaciones y la falta de aportación de documentos al procedimiento por una de las partes, no deben perjudicar a la otra parte, aceptándose en este contexto la suficiencia de la aportación de indicios para demostrar la ausencia de derechos o intereses legítimos por parte de la Demandada (en este sentido véase por ejemplo Facebook Inc. v. Usta Cafer,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0006).
Como prueba indiciaria de la ausencia de derechos o intereses legítimos en la Demandada, las Demandantes aportan el resultado de una búsqueda, a través del campo “titulares”, de marcas con efectos en España. ...
2011-11-11 - Case Details
Y la Titular ofrece, entre otras las siguientes pruebas: poder otorgado por los señores Aaron Adolfo Grego y Alberto Martel Hernández a favor del despacho jurídico que presentó la contestación a este procedimiento, impresiones de comunicaciones electrónicas entre los señores Aaron Adolfo Grego y Alberto Martel Hernández para el registro del nombre de dominio , actas de nacimiento de Alberto Martel Hernández y Martha Martell Hernández, impresiones de correos electrónicos entre Aaron Adolfo Grego y los abogados de la Promovente, encuestas, correos electrónicos de NIC-México al señor Aaron Adolfo Grego, copias de identificaciones oficiales con fotografía de los señores Aaron Adolfo Grego y Alberto Martel Hernández, perfiles de Aaron Adolfo Grego, Sytyos, Dreamscan y lista de clientes y listas premios y notas de prensa, así como direcciones en Linkedin, Facebook.
Del contenido y revisión exhaustiva de las referidas pruebas, este Experto colige lo siguiente: i) La Promovente tiene derechos sobre la marca MARTELL; ii) La Titular se ostenta en sus correos electrónicos como Alberto Martell; iii) Alfredo Martel Hernández también es conocido como Alberto Martell Hernández7 y iv) La Titular tiene derechos sobre el nombre de dominio .
...
2011-08-26 - Case Details
Other considerations such as the priorities in time of the respective claims or the nature of the respective uses do not fall for consideration under this paragraph of the Policy, but may arise under the other paragraphs. See e.g., Facebook, Inc. v. Callverse Pty Ltd,
WIPO Case No. DAU2008-0007.
As the disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s proven ALIEXPRESS trade mark on the relevant tests, therefore, the Panel finds that the Complainant has established the requirement under the first limb of the Policy. ...
2015-03-10 - Case Details
Indeed, previous panels have found that domain names containing the same words as in the Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to relevant trademarks. See, e.g., Facebook, Inc. v. Andre Schneider / DomCollect AG,
WIPO Case No. D2013-1183 (transfer of, inter alia, ); F. ...
2014-12-01 - Case Details
Le Défendeur se sert abondamment de ses sites web et ainsi que Facebook et Twitter pour faire ses publicités sous forme de dizaines de messages identiques, tous diffusant le numéro de téléphone unique de sa société de services de réparation.
...
2016-10-28 - Case Details
In response to a cease and desist letter the Respondent initially agreed to cease all use of Nirvana Drums on his websites and on various connected social media accounts on Facebook, ReverbNation and YouTube. He pointed out that the Sanskrit name Nirvana was an ancient Buddhist concept and said that he felt that the beneficial effect of drumming on his injuries would represent a personal Nirvana. ...
2014-11-19 - Case Details
Complainant uses her TaxGirl moniker on various social media, including Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube. She also produces a TaxGirl podcast, available through iTunes. Complainant has more than 30,000 Twitter followers.
...
2015-07-24 - Case Details
She notes that “Vanisha Mittal” is a commonly used name in Facebook pages and that various domain names are available for registration incorporating this name. She further notes a prior case concerning a domain name identical to the Disputed Domain Name in which the complaint was denied in , Vanisha Mittal v. info@setrillonario.com,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-11-19 - Case Details
Serafín Rodríguez Rodríguez,
Caso OMPI No. D2001-1183; Facebook Inc. v. Usta Cafer,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0006; Caso Autocontrol Cederroth Ibérica S.A.U. v. Jesús Vidriales Francho; y Edintorni Europe SRL v. ...
2010-11-12 - Case Details
Heute wird dasr Kennzeichen MYSWISSCHOCOLATE auf allen Schokoladenverpackungen, in sämtlichen Publikationen sowie in der Fernsehwerbung und auf www-myswisschocolate.ch sowie auf Facebook – mit 68’567 Fans im Oktober 2012 intensiv verwendet. Ob damit MYSWISSCHOCOLATE nachträglich Kennzeichnungskraft erworben hat, kann aber der Experte nicht beantworten.
...
2013-02-11 - Case Details
Other considerations such as the priorities in time of the respective claims or the nature of the respective uses do not fall for consideration under this paragraph of the Policy, but may arise under the other paragraphs. See e.g., Facebook, Inc. v. Callverse Pty Ltd,
WIPO Case No. DAU2008-0007.
As the disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s proven trademark on the relevant tests, therefore, the Panel finds that the Complainant has established the requirement under the first limb of the Policy.
...
2012-10-01 - Case Details
The trademark GUCCI is supported by intensive advertising campaigns worldwide, with campaigns appearing in important international magazines with broad circulation such as, Vogue, Vanity Fair, GQ and Glamour and a strong presence online through the most popular social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and FourSquare. As a consequence, the Complainant enjoys a worldwide reputation and goodwill as one of the leading manufacturers of luxury fashion products.
...
2012-12-11 - Case Details
Serafín Rodríguez Rodríguez,
Caso OMPI No. D2001-1183; Facebook Inc. v. Usta Cafer,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0006 y Caso Autocontrol Cederroth Ibérica S.A.U. v. Jesús Vidriales Francho).
...
2010-04-12 - Case Details
The Complainants cite in support of the Decision in Facebook Inc v. Privacy Ltd Disclosed Agent for YOLAPT,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1193.
5.A.5 As to use in bad faith, the Complainants points to the use made of the disputed domain name, which – as noted in paragraph 4.B.1 above – is to offer services some of which are identical to those protected by the RAPID SHARE trademarks and which are provided by the First Complainant under that trademark. ...
2010-06-16 - Case Details
The Domain Name is nearly identical to RapidShare's mark, and is being used in conjunction with related services (citing Facebook Inc. v Privacy Limited Disclosed Agent for YOLAPT,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1193).
(iii) The services which have been provided by the Respondent through the Respondent's website are identical to some of the services set forth in the specification for RapidShare's mark, namely “presentation of goods and services”. ...
2010-07-13 - Case Details
On the bottom right-hand side of the disputed web site, the Respondent provides several icons that link to the Complainant’s promotion pages on social media, such as Facebook and Twitter. The Respondent has intentionally designed the web site under the Disputed Domain Name to create an impression with Internet users that it is an official web site of the Complainant, or is endorsed or sponsored by the Complainant. ...
2014-09-22 - Case Details