The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. (the “Second Registrar”).
The disputed domain name is registered with Wix.com Ltd. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-02-23 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...In a response signed by a lawyer on behalf of the Respondent, the Respondent offered to sell the domain name in question. No claim was made as to the legitimate interest to the domain name apart from the selling of the domain name.
...
2004-03-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Vladyslav Klerfon, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with URL Solutions, Inc. ...The disputed domain name is a direct typosquatting imitation of the Complainant’s official website.
The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2026-07-20 - Case Details
The three elements are as follows:
- The Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
- The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in respect of the domain name; and
- The Respondent’s domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in respect of the domain name.
The Panel is prepared to accept that the Complainant has rights and legitimate interests in the domain name. ...
2000-07-04 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
EasyJet Airline Company Limited v. Marie Claire & [Unknown]
Case No. D2000-1504
1. Introduction
This is a mandatory administrative proceeding submitted for decision in accordance with the Uniform Policy for Domain Name Dispute Resolution, adopted by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) on August 26, 1999 (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, approved by ICANN on October 24, 1999 (the "Rules") and the World Intellectual Property Organization ("WIPO") Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules.
...Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires the Complainant to prove that:
i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a service mark in which the Complainant has rights;
ii) the Respondent has no legitimate interest in respect of the domain name;
iii) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2001-02-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Om Soft Solution, India, represented by Arun Thapa, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Harsh Gaba is not a cybersquatter but a genuine and authorized user of his mark as well as disputed domain name.
Further that the disputed domain name was not registered in order to prevent the Complainant from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name and, in connection therewith, Mr. ...
2021-06-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Dawei Xie of Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Xin Net Technology Corp. ...The disputed domain name was registered on May 8, 2016.
5. Parties' Contentions
A. Complainant
1. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's ASOS trade mark. ...
2016-08-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Emile Roubiot, rhloccitane, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name is registered with Squarespace Domains II LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent registered the Disputed Domain Name on September 12, 2023. The Disputed Domain
Name is passively held. At the date of this decision, the Panel found that the Disputed Domain Name directs
to a page mentioning “this site can’t be reached”.
...
2023-12-11 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...It claims in particular that “[t]he disputed domain names are similar in structure to the domain name that Complainant is the legal editor. ...
2020-03-06 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Additionally, the Panel finds that the Respondent’s failure to respond to the Complaint also supports the conclusion that it has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
The fact that most of the disputed domain names are currently inactive or resolve to a parking page does not change the Panel’s findings in this respect.
...
2019-06-13 - Case Details
The Respondents are 王先生 (wang xian sheng), China (“Previous Respondent”), and Super Privacy Service
LTD c/o Dynadot, United States of America / tianyu liu, China (“Subsequent Respondent”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <9fendi.com> (“Disputed Domain Name”) at the time of filing the Complaint was
registered with Hongkong Domain Name Information Management Co., Limited (the “Registrar”).
...The
Complainant’s trademark registrations for FENDI precede the registration of the Disputed Domain Name.
The Previous Respondent is not commonly known by the Disputed Domain Name. The commercial use of
the Disputed Domain Name by the Previous Respondent to redirect to gambling and pornographic websites
is not a fair or legitimate noncommercial use of the Disputed Domain Name; and
3) The Disputed Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2022-08-23 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...This use pre-dates the registration of the disputed domain name by 80 years. The burden is therefore on the Respondent to establish its rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2011-08-15 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The disputed domain name was registered on May 16, 2017, and the disputed domain
name was registered on July 7, 2011.
...
2023-12-08 - Case Details
The Registrar also forwarded the requested Whois details, confirmed that the Policy is in effect, and confirmed the Registrar has received a copy of the Complaint.
The Domain Name was registered on 12 January 1999 and the Domain Name was registered on March 9, 1999.
The WIPO Center determined that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Policy, the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Uniform Rules") and the Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...
2000-07-26 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2017-08-18 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant owns a number of registered trade marks for ROCKER including European Union Trade Mark No. 018171880, filed on December 23, 2019, registered on May 22, 2020, in classes 9, 36 and 45.
The disputed domain name was registered on May 31, 2021, and the disputed domain name was registered on July 16, 2021.
...
2022-01-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is 应潇毅 (Ying Xiao Yi), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd.
...The disputed domain name was registered on October 29, 2021. At the time of the f iling of the Complaint,
the disputed domain name resolved to a Dan.com parking page with the description “The owner of the
domain name uses the name servers of Dan.com but has not yet added the name to their portfolio”. ...
2023-12-14 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute
Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute
Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...This inference is reinforced by the fact that the dispu ted
domain names were registered shortly after the Complainant registered the domain name
and closely mimic that domain name through intentional misspellings of the
Complainant’s trademark combined with the terms “security” and “incident”. ...
2026-07-02 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...These are:
"(i) before any notice to you of the dispute, your use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the domain name or a name corresponding to the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services; or
(ii) you (as an individual, business, or other organization) have been commonly known by the domain name, even if you have acquired no trademark or service mark rights; or
(iii) you are making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name, without intent for commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trademark or service mark at issue."
...
2016-07-01 - Case Details
On November 21, 2002, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the Domain Names. On November 22, 2002, Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming that the Respondent is listed as the registrant and providing the contact details for the administrative, billing, and technical contact.
3.2 The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
3.3 In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2(a) and 4(a), the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on November 27, 2002. ...This product or service appears to allow subscribers to register various domain names prefixed by the figures "1212." To quote from the Respondent’s website (details of which are provided with the Complaint) it provides the facility to have "your own 1212 domain name of your choice. ...
2003-01-28 - Case Details