The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-09-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Vince Rivera, United States of America (“United States”), self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-05-01 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...On September 19, 2017 the UDRP panelist appointed in that case ruled in favor of the Complainant and ordered transfer of the domain name to the Complainant (See G4S Plc. v. Decrypter Cons,
WIPO Case No. D2017-1442 ().
...
2018-12-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bob Carberry, United States of America (the “US”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The disputed domain name is alco confusingly similar to the domain name owned by the Complainant,
, registered on August 9, 2016.
...
2024-09-10 - Case Details
Respondent is Sator Ltd. of Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DomainPeople, Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-06-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Above.com Domain Privacy of Australia / Huanglitech, Domain Admin of the People's Republic of China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Above.com, Inc.
3. ...It is well recognized in previous cases under the Policy that where such a mark is incorporated in its entirety within a domain name, the addition of one or more generic words will not distinguish that domain name from the mark (Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. ...
2010-07-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Whois Agent, Domain Protection Services, Inc., United States / Fcsw Tvsww, Hong
Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...More specifically, the Respondent is not sponsored by or legitimately affiliated with the Complainant in any
way, nor has the Complainant given the Respondent permission to use the Complainant’s mark PURDEY in
a domain name.
The Respondent has not been commonly known by the disputed domain name. At the time the Respondent
registered the disputed domain name, the Respondent had no trademark nor intellectual property rights in
the disputed domain name.
...
2022-10-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Admin, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on November 28, 2021. At the time of the filing of the Complaint,
the disputed domain name redirected to a website under another domain name that offered furniture. ...
2022-03-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ji Shupeng of Henan, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2017-11-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Golrito oPtikola, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name does not
resolve to an active web page.
On December 20, 2023, the Complainant’s representatives sent a notice to the Respondent, via the proxy
service with which the disputed domain name was registered, requesting transfer of the disputed domain
name. ...
2024-04-17 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant also owns numerous domain names comprising the trademark MICHELIN, including the
domain name , registered on December 1, 1993.
...
2025-12-17 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Neomarche (Alinea) v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc
Case No. D2024-2717
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Neomarche (Alinea), France, represented by Tmark Conseils, France.
The Respondent is Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc, Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Communigal Communications Ltd. ...
2024-08-23 - Case Details
The address of the Respondent as contained in the domain name registration is Rådmansgatan 7, Stockholm, Sweden.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is "pripps.com", which is registered with Network Solutions, Inc., ("the Registrar"), 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Herndon, Virginia 20170, United States.
3. ...Cf. Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows, Case No. D2000-0003.
Consequently, all the prerequisites for cancellation or transfer of the domain name according to Paragraph 4 (i) of the Rules are fulfilled.
7. ...
2000-11-01 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In previous decisions panelists have found that under certain circumstances
non use of a disputed domain name may nevertheless constitute use in bad faith
under the Policy (e.g. Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...
2005-08-04 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Panel further notes that, as found by other UDRP panels, where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known product or service, its very use by someone with no connection with the product suggests opportunistic bad faith: See for example Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin, Maison Fondée en 1772 v. ...
2012-06-15 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in which she has common law trademark rights; that Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and that the disputed domain name is used for commercial gain to mislead Internet users to an adult entertainment site that is not authorized or affiliated with Complainant.
...
2010-08-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Gourichon Kyllian, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Complainant is also the owner of the domain name . The Complainant became aware of
the disputed domain name recently, the disputed domain name was registered by the Respondent on
July 10, 2025, well after the Complainant had acquired rights over the trademark BELFIUS, the disputed
domain name does not resolve to an active webpage. ...
2025-09-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mengtian Zhao, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hong Kong Juming Network Technology
Co., Ltd (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Also, the
Respondent was not granted any permission whatsoever to incorporate the trademark of the Complainant in
a domain name. Finally, the Complainant states that “Respondent has never been given any permission by
Complainant to register or use the Domain Name, or any other domain name incorporating or imitating
Complainant’s TRAVELOCITY name and mark”.
...
2023-03-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Frank Papay, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Since the presently disputed domain name was registered 14 days after the transfer to the Complainant of the domain name (Philip Morris Products S.A. v. ...
2021-12-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Damaris Rohrer, United States of America ("United States” or “U.S.”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The very use of a domain name so closely resembling a trademark
suggests opportunistic bad faith. The Complainant points out that since registering a domain name entails
warranting that the domain name does not infringe other parties’ rights, the Respondent had a duty to verify
that no rights were indeed infringed. ...
2023-11-23 - Case Details