The Respondent is Cong wang, wangcong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GMO Internet, Inc. d/b/a Discount-
Domain.com and Onamae.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-01-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is lori harv, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Shaniya Stokes, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Web Commerce Communications
Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...and a
contact email address in the domain name , a domain name that does not resolve
to an active website.
The disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website at the time of this Decision, and the Panel
notes that there are no archived instances of a website associated with the disputed domain name available
from the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine.
5. ...
2025-01-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is co lee, SODEXO, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains II LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-12-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sheng Kai Lin, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognisable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-12-06 - Case Details
Respondent is Faith Clark, Telado Tech LLC, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Namecheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“Policy”), the Rules for Uniform
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain
Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-09-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Host Master, 1337 Services LLC, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The entirety of the mark TARGET is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-11-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is 大 大, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-09-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kevin Evans, United Kingdom.1
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-06-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Angel07 Mercy, Green Pasture Inc., United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...Calderón Rodriguez
Sole Panelist
Date: July 15, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Solvay S.A. v. Angel07 Mercy, Green Pasture Inc
Case No. D2024-2178
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-07-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jordan Gallagher, Albania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the Mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name, with the addition of the term
“sconti”. Accordingly, the Panel finds the Mark is clearly recognizable within the disputed domain name and
the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Mark.
...
2024-07-29 - Case Details
Respondent is Mark Roser, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Numerous UDRP panels have recognized that incorporating a trademark in its entirety can be sufficient to establish that the disputed domain name is at least confusingly similar to a registered trademark (see e.g., PepsiCo, Inc. v. PEPSI, SRL (a/k/a P.E.P.S.I.) and EMS Computer Industry (a/k/a EMS),
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-03-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is TPI, of Gallatin, Tennessee, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is (the "Disputed Domain Name"), registered with Network Solutions, Inc. ...iv) The Complainant has not authorized the Respondent to use the Trademark, nor is the Respondent affiliated with the Complainant in any way.
(v) The Respondent registered the domain name on June 13, 1996, with Network Solutions as registrar.
...
2003-08-11 - Case Details
The Respondent as registered is Gaststaette Rasthaus of Winterfeld, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain name") is registered with SIDN through EuroDNS S.A.
3. ...These circumstances together with the fact that the Domain name is offered for sale, further serve as evidence of bad faith use..
The Panel concludes that the Domain Name was registered and has been used in bad faith.
7. ...
2017-11-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Halina Yatskevich, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Burn World-Wide, Ltd. d/b/a BGT Partners v.
Banta Global Turnkey Ltd WIPO Case No. D2010-0470.
Generally speaking, a finding that a domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith
requires an inference to be drawn that the respondent in question has registered and is using the disputed
domain name to take advantage of its significance as a trademark owned by (usually) the complainant.
...
2022-11-29 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have found that the mere addition of a term to a trademark in a domain name does
not avoid a finding of confusing similarity. This has been held in many UDRP cases (see, e.g., The British
Broadcasting Corporation v. ...Dolphin@Heart, WIPO Case No. D2000-0713; AltaVista
Company v. S. M. A., Inc., WIPO Case No. D2000-0927).
It is also already well established that the addition of a gTLD such as “.com” is typically irrelevant when
determining whether a domain name is confusingly similar to a complainant’s trademark.
...
2022-06-29 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendments to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Lego Group also maintains an extensive website under the domain name .
The mark LEGO is in possession of substantial inherent and acquired distinctiveness. ...
2010-07-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Frederik Schmid of Luleå, Sweden / MyPrivacy.net Ltd. of Toronto, Ontario Canada,
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with EasyDNS Technologies Inc. ...The Panel notes that a prior panel made an equivalent finding in Johnson Controls Inc. v. Hansen,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1247 in which case the domain name was held to be confusingly similar to the complainant’s “Optima Batteries” trade mark.
...
2014-02-06 - Case Details
Respondent is Charles Lu, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Domain.com, LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name was registered on May 4, 2022. The Domain Name currently does not resolve to a
website. As of October 11, 2022, however, the Domain Name resolved to a website purporting to offer
college application services to consumers. ...
2023-03-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Fabio Azzouzi, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Moreover, there is no evidence indicating
that the Respondent is commonly known by the disputed domain name.
The Respondent does not appear to have operated any bona fide or legitimate business under the disputed
domain name and is not making a noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. ...
2023-10-05 - Case Details