The Respondent is Yali, Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Sav.com, LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the Disputed Domain Name.
Accordingly, the Disputed Domain Name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy.
...
2024-05-20 - Case Details
Finally, the disputed domain name is offered for sale for USD 5,000. The Respondent fails to make any
active use of the disputed domain name. ...This Panel will determine whether those facts constitute a violation
of the Policy that is sufficient to order the transfer of the disputed domain name (see Joseph Phelps
Vineyards LLC v. NOLDC, Inc., Alternative Identity, Inc., and Kentech, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-02-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sam Tier, UK.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com,
LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its HORDER and HORDER
HEALTHCARE trademarks, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the
Domain Name, and that the Respondent registered and is using the Domain Name in bad faith.
...
2025-09-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Joseph Ferdows, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith because: (i) the term “peren” and the ccTLD “.co” taken together create the word “perenco”, which is the domain name used by the Perenco Group for its official website at “www.perenco.com”; (ii) by registering a domain name that is almost identical to the Perenco Group’s domain name, the Respondent is expecting to divert traffic from the Complainants’ official website; (iii) the PERENCO trademark is neither descriptive nor evocative, and refers to the corporate names of the Complainants, which confirms that the Respondent knew that by registering the disputed domain name it was infringing the Complainants’ prior rights; (iv) the Complainants’ PERENCO trademark is widely reproduced on the website resolving from the disputed domain name, and remains visible on the front page during the Internet user’s browsing on the website; (v) the disputed domain name is not currently being operated for legitimate business activities but resolves to a website mirroring the Perenco Group’s official website, which Internet users will believe they are browsing; (vi) potential clients are invited in a section titled “Contact us” to address enquiries to the email addresses “[...]...
2021-09-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nguyen Tat Thanh, Viet Nam.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Nhan Hoa
Software Company Ltd. ...page 3
Second, the Complainant contends that the Respondent has not made use of, or demonstrable preparations
to use, the Disputed Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. Particularly,
the use of Disputed Domain Name does not meet the requirements described in the decision Oki Data
Americas, Inc. v. ...
2024-07-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is MovieWorld.s.r.o., Czech Republic.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Sav.com,
LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Further, it says that neither the Whois
data for the Disputed Domain Name, nor the corresponding website available at the Disputed Domain Name,
supports a conclusion that the Respondent is known by the Disputed Domain Name. ...
2023-01-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Great Avano, Multi Services, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GMO Internet, Inc. d/b/a Discount-
Domain.com and Onamae.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on August 17, 2025.
The disputed domain name is not currently linked to an active website. ...
2025-12-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Antonio Lopez, DHL Logistics, United States of America (“U.S.”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
NameCheap, Inc. ...The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the
Disputed Domain Name because it is not commonly known by the Disputed Domain Name, the Disputed
Domain Name is being used to perpetrate a phishing scam, and because it has no other web presence. ...
2024-01-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Julian Nova, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The disputed domain name was registered on March 13, 2025.
The disputed domain name resolves to an in-construction website displaying a default directory index page.
5. ...
2025-08-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is li zeping, zhangdaren, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...D2025-2923
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. Factual Background
The disputed domain name was registered on February 17, 2025. ...
2025-09-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lowe Abbey, Abbey Lowe, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with CNOBIN
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds that the geographic element, “-eu,” in the Domain Name betrays an intent to associate
misleadingly the Domain Name with the Complainant’s trademark. ...
2025-10-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Leon Williams, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with
Cosmotown, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-07-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Roger Vallon, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Complainant is also the owner of the domain name .
The dispute domain name was registered on October 6, 2024, and is currently inactive. ...
2024-12-23 - Case Details
Respondent is userdc dger, U.S.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...The entirety of the Mark is reproduced within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to the Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-11-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sophie, United States of America (“USA”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dominet (HK) Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Sophie
Case No. D2025-0886
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. Factual Background
The disputed domain name was registered on March 2, 2025.
...
2025-05-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ma Thien Lieu, Viet Nam.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Eranet International Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has not responded and the Panel is unable to conceive of any basis upon which the Respondent could sensibly be said to have any rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (Telstra Corporation Ltd. v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003).
The Panel finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name and that the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy have been fulfilled.
...
2021-06-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States of America (“United States”) / ????? ?????, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-12-11 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...As regards common control, the Panel notes that: (i) the disputed domain names share a similar domain
name pattern comprising of misspellings of the Complainant’s well-known trademark; (ii) the disputed
domain names were registered within a relatively short period of time (from June 20, 2023 until August 1,
2023); (iii) using the same privacy protection service; (iv) through the same registrar; and (v) all but one of
the disputed domain names have active mail servers associated with them.
...
2023-12-01 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the .ir Domain Name Dispute
Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “irDRP”), the Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the
“Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the
“Supplemental Rules”).
...As regards the second element, the Complainant argues that it had not authorized the Respondent to use its
DEERFOS trademark in any way, neither as an organization name, nor as a domain name. The Respondent
is not meeting the Oki Data test (Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...
2025-11-05 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint, together with the amended Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The contents of the disputed domain name vary from time to time. The disputed domain name has sometimes redirected users to malicious sites including “www.driver-fixer.com”, random scams, and drive-by downloads. ...
2019-06-03 - Case Details