The Respondent is Limon Masud, Bangladesh.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on September 24, 2024.
At the time of the present decision, the disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website.
...
2024-11-26 - Case Details
Furthermore, the Complaint notes that the printouts of pages from the Respondent’s website contain phrases such as “this domain name may be available for purchase” and “searching domain name” and “selling domain name” and “determination of the value of domain name” which is an indication of the bad faith of the Respondent in registering the disputed domain name and its intention of selling it.
...See Württembergische Versicherung AG v. Emir Ulu,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0278. A print-out of the page of the website for the Respondent’s disputed domain name (Annex 25 to the Complaint) shows <özdilek.com> as the title of the website.
...
2012-10-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bai Xiqing, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registry
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with RoTLD (the
“Registry”).
3. ...In view of the composition of the Disputed Domain Name, the Panel is of the opinion that
the Disputed Domain Name is likely to mislead Internet users, and there is no evidence that the Respondent
has been making legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Disputed Domain Name.
...
2025-11-18 - Case Details
It is evident from the Respondent's email correspondence with the Complainant contained in the file, and in particular in the official Response, that Superman's real name is Alexander Seirafi (Respondent).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is . ...That the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name; or
3. That the Respondent has registered or used the domain name in bad faith.
Therefore, the Complainant has failed to make its case regarding this domain name, and pursuant to paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy, the Panel orders that the domain name remain with the Respondent.
...
2001-11-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Websitebrokers Limited of P17-P19 Bow Wharf, 221 Grove Road, London E3 5SN, UK.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Domain Name is , registered by Network Solutions Inc.
3. ...The reference in this ground to "a corresponding domain name" is to a particular domain name, rather than to any domain name at all: see my decisions in D2000-1628, Julie Brown v. ...
2001-04-10 - Case Details
The annual costs for renewal of the disputed domain name have always been paid for by the Complainant. The Respondent has never used the disputed domain name.
...Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003). When comparing the disputed domain name with the Complainant’s word mark MERK-ECHT, the only difference is that the disputed domain name fails the hyphen. ...
2013-02-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Han Truong, HANTRUONG of Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...To satisfy the test, the trademark to which the domain name is said to be confusingly similar would generally need to be recognizable as such within the domain name. ...
2018-05-30 - Case Details
Respondent is Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States / D d, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Wild West Domains, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2021-11-16 - Case Details
The Respondent in this administrative proceeding is Brendan Conlon ("Respondent"), an individual with an address at Carnagarve, Moville, Co. Donegal, Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is ("Domain Name") and the Registrar is Schlund & Partner AG (the "Registrar") of Karlsruhe, Germany.
3. ...It is the view of the Panel that the disputed Domain Name has been registered for the sole purpose of selling it.
Selling a domain name is however not in itself prohibited by the ICANN
Policy, as stated in Manchester Airport PLC v. ...
2002-11-06 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy directs that Complainants must prove each of the following:
(i) that the Domain Name registered by Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainants have rights;
(ii) that Respondent has no legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) that the Domain Name has been registered and used in bad faith:
To prevail, Complainants must establish each of the foregoing elements, which are separately addressed below.
...
2005-04-07 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Given the fame of the ACCENTURE trademark and the fact that the Domain Name is so obviously connected with Complainant’s mark, the Panel considers that the only logical conclusion is that Respondent targeted Complainant and its ACCENTURE mark when registering the Domain Name.”
...
2020-09-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Patrice Beaut of France.
2. The Domain Name, Registry and Registrar
The Registry of the disputed domain name is the European Registry for Internet Domains
(“EURid” or the “Registry”). ...PANEL DECISION
Etablissements Sogal v. Patrice Beaut
Case No. DEU2023-0047
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name, Registry and Registrar
3. ...
2024-01-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is marcus vinicius Silva, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-09-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domains By Proxy, LLC of Arizona, United States of America (“United States”) / Varun Uppal of Gurgaon, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-10-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Vikrant Bajaj, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant points out that the disputed domain name is also on at least one black list in relation to
spam, malware or other domain name abuse. ...
2022-11-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Administrator, See PrivacyGuardian.org, United States / He YouYou, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Moreover, the Domain Name has been registered and used in bad faith. The Respondent registered the
Domain Name with prior knowledge of the Trademark. ...
2022-03-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Wen Zhang of Changsha, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2017-08-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is zheng jie, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Web Commerce
Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name was registered on January 5, 2024. At the time the Complaint was filed, the Domain
Name was a copycat version of the Complainant’s website. ...
2024-04-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Host Master, 1337 Services LLC, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The disputed domain name was registered on August 20, 2023. The disputed domain name resolves to a
website that of fers the same services as of fered by the Complainant.
5. ...
2024-03-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Miller Miller, Bumble, United States of America (“US”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The disputed domain name was registered on October 9, 2024. At the time of this decision, the disputed
domain name does not resolve to an active website. ...
2024-12-02 - Case Details