The Respondent is Sabin Stanescu, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with ROTLD (the “Registrar”).
3. ...This Panel accepts the Complainant’s evidence that ACTAVIS trademark is well-knwon worldwide in its business. See also Actavis Holdco US, Inc v. Mahfuz Akand, Software Bazar Bangladesh,
WIPO Case No. D2021-0834.
The disputed domain name was created in 2019 and incorporates the Complainant’s mark in its entirety.
...
2021-09-02 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant asserts that: (1) The domain names ,
and are identical or confusingly
similar to the trademark "Hotel Sacher Wien" in which the Complainant
has exclusive rights; (2) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests
with respect to the domain name; and that (3) the domain name was registered
and is being used in bad faith.
...Bad faith (paragraph 4 (a) (iii))
The Complainant provided evidence of facts, which are clearly relevant to the
issue of whether the Respondent registered and is using the domain name in bad
faith.
The Complainant’s trademark is widely known and so, in the absence of evidence
or even an assertion by the Respondent to the contrary knowledge of the Complainant’s
rights can be imputed to the Respondent at the time of its registration of the
domain names(see WIPO Case D2001-0431 Fairmont
Hotel Management L.P. v. ...
2001-08-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is BHAV Group, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...In the absence of legitimate interests in the
disputed domain name, the registration of an identical domain name with the Complainant's official domain
name, poses a significant and valid security threat to the Complainant.
...
2024-01-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is admin, Republic of Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gabia, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds it proper and fair to render this decision in English. The disputed domain name is composed
of Latin characters and the webpage to which the disputed domain name resolves displays links and an offer
for sale of the disputed domain name in English. ...
2023-04-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Elly Cheung of Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests with respect to the Domain Name, and that the Domain Name was registered and used in bad faith. ...
2017-05-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Su Guangyu of Wuhan, Hubei, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DotPH (the “Registry”).
3. ...See Skype Limited v. Hanna Jeong,
WIPO Case No. DPH2011-0001.
Therefore, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights. ...
2017-05-16 - Case Details
Respondent is Mike Schatzels, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The SERVPRO mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-05-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mantas Lika, Lithuania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name SRS AB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Nattermann & Cie. GmbH v. Mantas Lika
Case No. D2025-2061
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-07-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is jing wang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Dimas Satria, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...In the past, according to the WayBack machine, at times, the disputed domain name
resolved to parked webpages indicating that the disputed domain name might be for sale.
5. ...
2025-11-19 - Case Details
Respondent is DODSONCLAYTON, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-11-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mani Zelles, United States of America (“US”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Wix.com Ltd. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-06-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is ejder bambu, Türkiye.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...As mentioned above, the Respondent has been using the disputed domain name to redirect Internet users to
the trading site Dan.com where the disputed domain name is being listed for sale for USD 2,850. ...
2024-07-22 - Case Details
Respondent is Web Master, Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Dynadot Inc
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant states that
Respondent has not been licensed or authorized either to use Complainant’s Mark or to apply for the
registration of a domain name including or deriving from it.
Complainant submits that the Domain Name resolves to a webpage where the Domain Name has been
listed for sale for USD 1,999. ...
2025-11-14 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant further states that the disputed domain name was registered, after the
filing of the original Complaint concerning the disputed domain name , as an attempt to
circumvent the Panel’s decision, by redirecting users to a website published at the newly registered the
disputed domain name.
...
2025-04-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hamada Hilal, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with One.com A/S (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2021-02-17 - Case Details
The Center
verified that the Complaint satisfies the formal requirements of the ICANN Uniform
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Policy), the Rules for Uniform Domain
Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Rules), and the Supplemental Rules for Uniform
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Supplemental Rules). ...NICS’s
use of this domain name appears to have been entirely passive. Under authority
such as Telstra v. Nuclear Marshmallows, WIPO
Case No. ...
2001-06-11 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...The registrant might still have an argument for legitimate fair use of the domain name and might be deemed to have registered and used the domain name in good faith, if the registrant acts reasonably promptly to remove the domain name from that default commercial use by the registrar. ...
2018-07-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Zhang Fei, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba.com Singapore E-
Commerce Private Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Christie
Sole Panelist
Date: June 25, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Black Diamond Equipment, Ltd. v. Zhang Fei
Case No. D2024-1844
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-07-17 - Case Details
- The advice from NSI that the domain name in question is still "active" indicates the Respondent has not requested that the domain name at issue be deleted from the domain name database. ...E.g. D2000-1293 Telstra Corporation Ltd. v Warren Bolton Consulting Pty. Ltd. (There the mark was "big pond" and the disputed domain name ).
...
2001-04-04 - Case Details