The Respondent is Sasha Ken, Investment, United States of America
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a
Registrar.eu (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on September 2, 2023. The disputed domain name used to point
to a website impersonating the Complainant.
5. ...
2024-05-16 - Case Details
Respondent is Hyo Ryung, business, Philippines.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Dynadot Inc (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the
Domain Name:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which
Complainant has rights;
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2025-01-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is David Chiu, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-09-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Admin of Daegu, Republic of Korea, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gabia, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name incorporates the Complainant’s trademark in its entirety, and the addition of the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) extension “.com” may be disregarded when assessing whether a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark (Proactiva Medio Ambiente, S.A. v. ...
2019-05-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Charlie Maddie,
United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...There are no rights or legitimate interests held by the Respondent in respect of the Domain Name. The
Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name nor does the Respondent have any authorization
from the Complainant to register the Domain Name. ...
2022-03-21 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In addition, the Panel notes that the disputed domain name
remains inactive. The Panel finds that the passive holding of this disputed domain
name does not constitute legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name.
...
2022-07-14 - Case Details
Customer 0156768379, Canada / Amber Beauty, Glow Organics, LLC, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows Inc. ...Here, the Domain Name was registered on January 22, 2020.
Third, Complainant argues that Respondent’s use of the Domain Name is not bona fide. ...
2020-06-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Admin, Taranga Services Pty Ltd of New Zealand.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Moniker Online Services, LLC.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the ”Policy” or ”UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the ”Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the ”Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-03-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Garry Mall, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed
domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of
the Policy. ...
2025-09-23 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The disputed domain name was registered on April 2, 2021. The other 63 disputed domain names were registered on May 16, 2021. ...
2021-10-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mel Light of Los Angeles, California, United States, and Domains By Proxy, Inc. of Scottsdale, Arizona, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Disputed Domain Name") is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC.
3. ...As the panel in Dr. Ing. H.c.F. Porsche AG v. Vasily Terkin,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0888, noted, "a domain name that wholly incorporates a Complainant's registered mark may be sufficient to establish confusingly similarity for purposes of the UDRP.” ...
2012-03-28 - Case Details
Respondent is Jonathan Downey of Elkton, Maryland, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the ”Policy” or ”UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the ”Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the ”Supplemental Rules”).
...
2011-07-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ya Lin, Nameplus, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Global Domains
International, Inc. ...In such circumstances, the
Respondent’s use of the Domain Name for a website advertising the Domain Name as being for sale for
a significant sum amounts to use of the Domain Name in bad faith.
...
2023-10-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Liana Cadbury, Hilbrough ltd, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Thus, the disputed domain name would likely confuse Internet users into believing that the
disputed domain name would direct them to a website related to the Complainant’s activities. ...
2023-10-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lokesh Kumar of Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Synergy Wholesale Pty Ltd (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent is not commonly known by the Disputed Domain Name. The WhoIs information associated with the Disputed Domain Name identifies the Respondent as Lokesh Kumar.
...
2018-08-24 - Case Details
Furthermore, the Respondent is not known under the disputed domain name and the Respondent does not use the disputed domain name as trade or business name.
The Complainant finally considers that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. ...Furthermore, the Respondent is not known under the disputed domain name and the Respondent does not use the disputed domain name as trade or a business name.
The Respondent has failed to produce countervailing evidence of any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
...
2019-05-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Manlidy, GNN, Singapore.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with OwnRegistrar, Inc. ...Even if the Respondent did not use the disputed domain name for redirecting the Complainant’s website and
sending fraudulent emails, the Panel finds that based on the record the Respondent has no rights or
legitimate interests in the disputed domain name because the disputed domain name is inactive and there is
no evidence that the Respondent is commonly known by the disputed domain name or has any trademark
rights related to the disputed domain name.
...
2023-01-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / yang zhi, Malaysia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has not responded and the Panel is unable to conceive of any basis upon
which the Respondent could sensibly be said to have any rights or legitimate interests in respect of the
disputed domain name (Telstra Corporation Limited. v. Nuclear Marshmallows, WIPO Case No. D2000-
0003).
The Panel finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain
name and that the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy have been fulfilled.
...
2022-07-06 - Case Details
Respondent is Jurgen Neeme, Estonia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Respondent, according to the disclosed WhoIs information for the disputed domain name, is a resident of
Estonia and has registered the disputed domain name on May 16, 2021. By the time of the rendering of this
decision, the disputed domain name resolves to a website at “www.ralphlauren.me”, where the disputed
domain name is offered for online sale. ...
2022-07-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Raina Goswami, RG group LLc, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Furthermore, the disputed domain name in the email address differs by only one letter from a domain name
used by the Complainant. ...
2025-07-15 - Case Details