The Respondent is P D S AB, a corporation organized under the laws of Sweden, having its principal place of business at Luntmakaregatan 12, Stockholm, Sweden.
2. The Domain Name(s) and Registrar(s)
The domain name at issue is , which domain name is registered with Network Solutions, Inc. ...Cf. Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows, Case
No. D2000-0003.
Consequently, all the prerequisites for cancellation or transfer of the domain name according to Paragraph 4 (i) of the Rules are fulfilled.
...
2000-04-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kate Milenskaya, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...According to the WhoIs entry, said domain name was registered on
October 2, 2007. No history has been produced of the use of this domain name.
...
2024-01-16 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...With reference to the Respondent’s lack of rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, the Complainant asserts that:
i) the Respondent has not used the disputed domain name or a name corresponding to it in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services;
ii) the disputed domain name is used by two UK competitors of the Complainant, Argenthal & Co Limited and Argenthal Private Capital Limited;
iii) the Respondent has not been commonly known by the disputed domain name and has no trademark or service mark rights;
iv) the Respondent has not used the disputed domain name in connection with a legitimate noncommercial or fair use.
...
2015-06-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Brad Klepper, Drivers Legal Plan, Ltd., United States, represented by McAfee & Taft,
United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...See WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.1; AXA SA v. Huade Wang, WIPO Case No.
D2022-1289.
On this point, the Complainant asserts that: (1) the Respondent is not a licensee of the Complainant nor is
the Respondent otherwise authorized to use the ROAD LAW mark for any purpose, (2) the Respondent is
not commonly known by the disputed domain name, (3) “upon information and belief,” the Respondent is not
commonly known by the disputed domain name, and (4) the Respondent is not using the disputed domain
name with a bona fide offering of goods and services, but instead is using the disputed domain name to
redirect Internet users to its own website offering identical services for commercial gain.
...
2023-07-20 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In the case of the disputed domain name , the corresponding trademark of the Complainant
Fancade AB, DRIVE MAD, was not yet registered when the disputed domain name was registered on June
15, 2023. ...
2025-11-03 - Case Details
Respondent is Naija Host of Silver Springs, Maryland, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...See America Online, Inc. v. Xianfeng Fu,
WIPO Case No. 2000-1374 (holding that it would be "unconscionable to find a bona fide offering of services in a respondent's operation of web-site using a domain name which is confusingly similar to the complainant's mark and for the same business").
...
2015-08-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is TOEFL, with address in New York, New York, USA.
2. The Domain Name(s) and Registrar(s)
The disputed domain name is "toefl.com".
The registrar of the disputed domain name is Network Solutions, Inc., with business address in Herndon, Virginia, USA.
3. ...Id., at page (v).
3. When a domain name is used on goods, it takes on the characteristics of a trademark.
4. See, e.g., Avery Dennison v. ...
2000-03-17 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
2.1 The domain name at issue (the "Domain Name") is .
2.2 The Registrar is Network Solutions Inc. ...v) The "empty and inactive" holding of the Domain Name is likely to have a negative effect on the Complainant’s trade marks and amounts to bad faith as inaction is within the concept of use in bad faith.
5.2 The Respondent
5.2.1. ...
2002-12-17 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Many Panels have found that a disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a complainant’s trademark where the disputed domain name incorporates the complainant’s trademark in its entirety (e.g., Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v. ...
2015-02-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Shoucheng Hu, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hong Kong Juming Network
Technology Co., Ltd (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant also operates a website at the domain name .
The disputed domain name was registered on September 28, 2022. At the time of filing of the Complaint the
disputed domain name ultimately resolved to a website that contained a link to a website offering gambling
services.
5. ...
2023-04-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Xiurong Ling, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
Name.com, Inc. ...The Complainant submits that “by using authentic products images which
are copyright of the Complainant…, and images which are copyright of the Complainant’s resellers... the
Respondent is indeed attempting to create the impression that the (Disputed) Domain Name and Website
are connected to, or sponsored by, the Complainant”.
This Panel accepts that the Respondent is not an authorized reseller with a legitimate interest in a domain
name incorporating a Complainant’s mark, and there is no disclaimer on the website the Disputed Domain
Name resolve to, therefore it cannot meet the tests set out in Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...
2022-10-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Admin, Whois Privacy Corp. of Nassau, the Bahamas.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Internet Domain Service BS Corp (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2017-03-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jane Watson, Thailand.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DropCatch.com LLC., (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Finally
the Complainant submits that the Respondent is not making a legitimate non-commercial or fair use of the
disputed domain name as the Respondent is not making any use of the disputed domain name in connection
with an active website or even indicating demonstrable preparations to use the disputed domain name.
...
2024-04-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lucille Echohawk, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Wild West Domains, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant asserts that
the Complainant never authorized the Respondent to use the disputed domain name, that the Respondent is
not generally known by the disputed domain name, never operated a business under the disputed domain
name, and never engaged in any bona fide commercial activity in connection with the disputed domain
name. ...
2024-05-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jasmine Gallagher, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. .../Erica Aoki/
Erica Aoki
Sole Panelist
Date: January 17, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Dansko, LLC v. Jasmine Gallagher
Case No. DCO2024-0093
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-01-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Theresa Chavez, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that it has satisfied each of the elements required under the Policy for a transfer
of the disputed domain name.
The Complainant states that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademark OTTO’S, and
to its official domain name.
...
2025-10-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Shi Lei, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Dynadot
Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the Trademark is reproduced within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-08-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nicolas Kokkalis, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 1&1 IONOS Inc. ...The disputed domain name was registered on December 9, 2006. The disputed domain name currently does not resolve to an active webpage.
5. ...
2020-07-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Maxim I Fedoseev of Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Regional Network Information Center, JSC dba RU-CENTER-MSK (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2016-05-26 - Case Details
Respondent is Charles Eaton, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America ("Respondent").
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is .
The Registrar is Network Solutions, Inc. ...No rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
The Respondent has no legitimate interests in respect of the domain name .
...
2002-09-16 - Case Details