The Respondent is Massalfa Microwave, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-05-31 - Case Details
Respondent is Koshe So, US.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Steinhardt
Sole Panelist
Date: July 19, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Bellwether FOS Holdco, Inc. v. Koshe So
Case No. D2024-2271
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-07-24 - Case Details
Respondent is Ruth Hermine, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Register SPA (the “Registrar”).
3. ...In the circumstances of this case, this is evidence of registration in bad faith.
The disputed domain name resolves to a parking website. However, Respondent’s passive holding of the disputed domain name qualifies as use in bad faith in this case (Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...
2021-01-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Danielle Frazier, Assurant realty1, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains II LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on September 4, 2024. The web site associated with the
disputed domain name is a page that displays the disputed domain name and the following text: “We’re
under construction. ...
2025-06-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / [Name Redacted].
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Wild West Domains, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on May 24, 2020.
According to the Complainant’s submissions, the disputed domain name had not resolved to any active website. ...
2021-11-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Valter Vergnano of San Carlos California, United States of America (“USA”) and Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Melbourne IT Ltd (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2013-11-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is leblanc mcdonnell, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Limbury
Sole Panelist
Date: August 12, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. leblanc mcdonnell
Case No. D2024-2357
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-08-14 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...During the alleged telephone discussion, Respondent said that he was selling the Domain Names to a non-profit entity who was filing legal claims against Complainant, and that Respondent had set the prices at USD 5,000 per Domain Name (plus USD 200 for the domain name).
...
2014-10-20 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...This establishes bad faith under paragraph 4(b). As in Nokia Corp. v. Nokia Ringtones & Logos Hotline,
WIPO Case No. D2001-1101, by registering and using the dispute domain name, the Respondent here “has created the (incorrect) impression of association with the [Complainant] . . . ...
2007-09-05 - Case Details
Petersburg, Russian
Federation, represented by Andrey Shushkov, Russian Federation (hereafter collectively
identified as Respondent).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the Domain Name) is registered
with DomReg Ltd. d/b/a LIBRIS.com.
3. ...Respondent denies that if offered to sell the domain name for profit, and instead asserts that it has consistently rejected offers for the Domain Name.
...
2005-08-01 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Requiring
Respondents to change the configuration and content of their website in order
to use a different domain name would cost at least $20,000 to $25,000, the amount
for which they offered to sell the disputed domain names to Complainant.
6. ...
2007-03-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Aleksei Prokudin, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Registrar of Domain Names
REG.RU LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-04-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is MTZ International s.r.l., Italy, represented by FIAMMENGHI-FIAMMENGHI, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...Complainant
The Complainant states that the disputed domain name is identical to his name and surname “Vincenzo
Attolini”.
Moreover, the Complainant asserts that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the
disputed domain name since it has not been authorized by the Complainant to register the disputed domain
name or to use his name and surname within the disputed domain name and it is not commonly known by
the disputed domain name.
...
2022-06-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is roger beland, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Ultahost, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-08-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lin Lin, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Dynadot Inc (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent cannot demonstrate the use of the Domain Name in connection with a
bona fide offering of goods or services. Furthermore, the Respondent is not commonly known by the
Domain Name and cannot present a fair use or noncommercial use of the Domain Name. ...
2025-07-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is claudio bonfanti, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gandi SAS (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on August 27, 2024, way after the Complainant’s trademark was
registered. The disputed domain name resolves to a parking page. ...
2024-10-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Andre Jorge Jose Pires, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...There is no evidence
that the Respondent is commonly known by the disputed domain name. In addition, the Respondent is
neither using the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods and services nor
making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. ...
2025-10-15 - Case Details
The disputed domain name incorporates the Complainant’s FORMLABS trademark entirely;
- Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. Respondent has not been commonly known by the disputed domain name, Respondent’s use and registration of the disputed domain name was not authorized by Complainant and Respondent is not making legitimate use of the disputed domain name;
- Respondent has registered and used the disputed domain name in bad faith. ...
2019-01-23 - Case Details
Respondent is Rodrigo Assis Vieira, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with eNom, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...In addition, in cases where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trade mark the domain name will
normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of the UDRP. ...
2023-03-22 - Case Details
Respondent is SEAN MICHAEL, Workplace Creation, UK.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-06-20 - Case Details