The Respondent is su jia xing, Republic of Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-01-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Edson Oliver dos Santos, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-09-02 - Case Details
C. The Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name was registered on June 24, 2020.
D. Use of the Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name has not been used.
5. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark; the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2021-02-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is RICHARD BOURET, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name SRS AB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...This is a fraudulent impersonation of the Complainant that clearly demonstrates a use in bad faith of the
disputed domain name.
The disputed domain name currently directing to an error page does not alter the finding that the disputed
domain name was registered and used in bad faith.
...
2024-02-20 - Case Details
Respondent is Kerstin Ebersbach, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Web Werks India Pvt. ...The disputed domain name incorporates Complainant’s PETER KAISER trademark in its entirety. Numerous UDRP panels have recognized that incorporating a trademark in its entirety can be sufficient to establish that the disputed domain name is at least confusingly similar to a registered trademark (see, e.g., PepsiCo, Inc. v. ...
2019-11-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Office Yui Asia Limited of Fujisawa, Japan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-11-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is YangZhiChao, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 22net, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Hughes
Sole Panelist
Dated: December 16, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Wolfspeed, Inc. v. YangZhiChao
Case No. D2022-3989
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History...
2022-12-27 - Case Details
The disputed domain name was registered on November 30, 2023. The disputed domain name resolves to
a registrar parked page. ...In the present case, the
Complainant’s trademark ARCELORMITTAL enjoys a strong reputation (Arcelormittal SA v. Tina Campbell,
WIPO Case No. DCO2018-0005). Taking into account the fact that the disputed domain name consists of a
misspelling of the Complainant’s trademark which cannot be the result of a hazard, there is no doubt in the
Panel’s opinion that the Respondent was well aware of the Complainant’s trademark when it registered the
disputed domain name.
...
2024-01-26 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
2.1 The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with
Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The form of the Domain Name is such that the Panel is also satisfied that the
Respondent intended the Domain Name to be read that way, particularly given the extent of the
Complainant’s business at the time that the Domain Name was registered. ...
2025-06-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is thebestking mu, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-12-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is John Olin, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GMO Internet,
Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name was registered on February 15, 2024. The Domain Name is inactive.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. ...
2024-05-06 - Case Details
Respondent is Weaks Kenneth, Kenneth LLC, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the Quarterra Mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the
disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-04-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is 刘建福 (Liu Jia), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a
HiChina (www.net.cn) (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on July 29, 2024. According to the evidence presented by the
Complainant, the disputed domain name is not put into actual use but offered for sale for USD 2,500 on a
domain name trading platform.
5. ...
2024-12-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Supreme Forest, Semper Solaris, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name SRS AB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered by Supreme Forest, Semper Solaris. The disputed domain name
resolves to an inactive page.
5. ...
2025-09-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Johnson Michael, las pasmas, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gransy, s.r.o. d/b/a subreg.cz (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name, and the disputed domain name
differs from the trademark by the insertion of the letters “t” and “n”. ...
2025-11-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Rita Namatovu, Uganda.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...The Complainant Lennar Corporation operates a website at the domain name.
The disputed domain name was registered on June 5, 2025. It redirects to the Complainants’ website. ...
2026-01-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Charles Benson, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Since many years the Complainants operate a website under the domain name .
The disputed domain name was registered on March 4, 2024, and does not resolve to an active website.
...
2024-10-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sophia Bohm, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Key-Systems GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...On March 9, 2023, the disputed domain name was registered.
The website associated with the disputed domain name redirects to the domain name
. ...
2024-11-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Loretta Zayas, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...As noted in the WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.3, from the inception of the UDRP, panelists have found that the non-use of a domain name would not prevent a finding of bad faith under the doctrine of passive holding. See Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...
2020-11-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. of United States of America (“United States”) / / Mark Jones, maribis shop of United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...See inter alia DeLaval Holding AB v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy LLL / Craig Kennedy,
WIPO Case No. D2015-2135.
Noting that the disputed domain name incorporates a registered and used trademark, that no response has been filed, that there appears to be no conceivable good faith use that could be made by the Respondent of the disputed domain name and considering all the facts and evidence, the Panel finds that the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy are also fulfilled in this case.
7. ...
2019-07-03 - Case Details