Respondent is Steven Green, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint, together with the amended Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2021-03-01 - Case Details
The disputed domain name was registered on May 29, 2018. The disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website.
5. ...However, as first stated in Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003, and repeated in many subsequent decisions under the UDRP: “the concept of a domain name ‘being used in bad faith’ is not limited to positive action; inaction is within the concept. ...
2019-10-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States / Ahmed Hemaid, Palestine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on December 2, 2016.
The disputed domain name used to resolve to a website purporting to offer a tool for downloading videos and photos from Instagram. ...
2021-07-20 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...This website is similar to a website previously located at the domain name until that domain name was transferred to the First Complainant pursuant to the panel’s decision under the UDRP in Worldpay Limited v. ...
2018-04-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tahir Nazir, Webhive, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-07-25 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Banque et Caisse d'Epargne de l'Etat, Luxembourg v. Domain Privacy,
Domain Name Privacy Inc
Case No. D2024-1275
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Banque et Caisse d'Epargne de l'Etat, Luxembourg, Luxembourg, represented by Office
Freylinger S.A., Luxembourg.
The Respondent is Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc., Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
Communigal Communications Ltd. ...
2024-06-06 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Respondent is using the disputed domain name in bad faith, as evidenced by the website posted under the
disputed domain name showing an attempt to impersonate the Complainant. ...
2024-06-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ambrose Quin, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Openprovider (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2021-09-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Daniel Hofmann,
Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-06-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Emily DUBOIS, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Openprovider (the “Registrar”).
3. ...See De Beers Intangibles Limited v. Domain Admin, Whois Privacy Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2016-1465).
Here, the Complainant has clearly satisfied its burden of evidence: the Complainant has argued that it does not know the Respondent, is not linked to the Respondent, and that to its knowledge the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2021-04-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is James Gates, Gambia (the).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DreamHost, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant operates multiple web sites, including its main web site at the domain name .
The disputed domain name was registered on October 28, 2025. No content has been made available on
the disputed domain name.
...
2026-01-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Name Redacted, Lithuania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant requests a decision that the Domain Name be transferred to it. The Complainant also requests that the name of the Respondent (as presented to the Registrar) be redacted in line with the decision in Banco Bradesco S.A. v. ...
2019-09-18 - Case Details
Complainant also argues that the addition of "game(s)", "kid", "online" and "s" do not affect that conclusion, and cites the decision in MILIPOL v. Milipol International,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0387 to support its claim that the addition of "est" to the First Mark in the disputed domain name does not eliminate confusing similarity between that domain name and Complainant's trademarks.
...However, Complainant's submissions do not account for the numerous UDRP decisions since 2003 in which panels have held that the burden only shifts to a respondent once a complainant has established a prima facie case that the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name. See, for example, Accor v. Eren Atesmen,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0701 ("A complainant must show a prima facie case that a respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name, after which the burden of rebuttal passes to the respondent.") and Croatia Airlines d.d. v. ...
2016-11-22 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “irDRP”), the Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant further submits that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The Respondent is not known by the disputed domain name and has not acquired any trademark or service mark rights in that name or mark. ...
2019-04-18 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Gameloft S.E v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc
Case No. D2024-1211
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Gameloft S.E, France, represented internally.
The Respondent is Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc, Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Communigal Communications Ltd., (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...
2024-05-20 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the ”Supplemental Rules”).
...See Canon U.S.A., Inc. v. Miniatures Town,
WIPO Case No. D2014-0948, citing WIPO Overview 2.0, paragraph 2.1 (after the complainant makes a prima facie case, the burden of showing rights or legitimate interests in the domain name shifts to the respondent).
...
2017-01-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Edward Cullen, Crescite Innovation Corporation, United States of America (“United
States”), self -represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...case=D2025-2240
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
AXA SA v. Edward Cullen, Crescite Innovation Corporation
Case No. D2025-2329
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-08-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is gervais bruno, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Ligne Web Services SARL (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is (i) confusingly similar to its earlier trademarks, (ii)
the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, and (iii) the disputed
domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2022-06-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is andrus bennett, U.S.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
NameCheap, Inc. ...Isenberg
Sole Panelist
Date: November27, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Nature’s Way Products, LLC v. andrus bennett
Case No. D2023-4329
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2023-12-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Artur Arakelyan of Moscow, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Registrar also provided the full contact details held on its WhoIs database in respect of the Domain Name and indicated that the expiry date of the Domain Name was January 25, 2017.
The Center wrote back to the Registrar on March 16, 2017, asking it to confirm that the expiry date of the Domain Name is January 25, 2018. ...
2017-05-09 - Case Details