About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 58508   document(s)s (0.118 sec)

Rows

<<  <  36841 - 36860  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0494 for cesiusa.org html (14 KB)

The Respondent is Kesslyn Howard, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Openprovider (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Confédération Nationale du Crédit Mutuel v. Daniel Delcore, WIPO Case No. DLC2009-0001). Needless to say, use of a domain name in connection with fraud or other nefarious activities would also support a finding of bad faith registration and use. ...

2021-04-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1111 for rakutenbazaar.com, rakutenbazaar.net, rakutenglobalmall.net, rakutenhub.net, rakutenmarket.net, rakutenprime.com, rakutenprime.net, rakutenstore.net, rakutenworld.net pdf (220 KB)

The Complainant further underlines that considering: i) the Complainant’s rights long predate the registration of the disputed domain names; ii) that the Respondent Bui Quang Hieu is the same registrant against which the Complainant filed a prior UDRP Complaint for the disputed domain name (see Rakuten Group, Inc. v. ...The Panel also finds paragraph 4(b)(ii) of the Policy applicable in this case as the Respondents registered the disputed domain names in order to prevent the Complainant from reflecting its mark in corresponding domain names and has engaged in a pattern of such conduct since they registered nine disputed domain names incorporating the Complainant’s trademark as well as an additional domain name subject to a separate prior proceeding (Rakuten Group, Inc. v. ...

2024-05-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1441 for mtvextra.com html (35 KB)

The Respondent is Chamandeep Singh, an individual residing in the United Kingdom.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar 2.1. The domain name the subject of this Complaint is "mtvextra.com". 2.2. ...In relation to the domain name "mtvextra.com", the relevant part of this domain name is "mtvextra". This Administrative Panel finds that this part of the domain name is identical to the Complainants’ service mark MTV EXTRA (the absence of a space in the domain name being of no significance). ...

2001-01-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-1782 for dazn.live pdf (180 KB)

The Respondent is xue, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Respondent does not appear to be commonly known by the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name resolves to the website “www.sedo.com”, where the disputed domain name is offered for sale. ...

2023-07-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0313 for equinor-energy.com pdf (141 KB)

The Respondent is Frode Fiksdal, Norway. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Realtime Register B.V. ...There is no evidence of the Respondent’s use of, or preparations to use, the Domain Name or a name corresponding to the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...

2023-03-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1596 for buyxenicalusa.com, xenicalonlinepharm.com, xenicalonlinepharmacy.com, xenicalpricer.com, xenicalwithoutrx.com html (19 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...“The fact that a trademark is incorporated in its entirety in a domain name is a solid indication of but does not ipso facto mean that the domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark. ...

2012-11-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1870 for xvideored.com html (10 KB)

The Respondent is Registration Provate, Domains By Proxy, LLC of Scottsdale, Arizona, United States / Rafael Santos of Sao Paulo, Brazil. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Such use of the disputed domain name could not be said to be bona fide. In the oft-quoted case of Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. ...

2017-11-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-0486 for allmakgroup.com pdf (136 KB)

The Respondent is Michael John, United Kingdom. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Panel finds the ALIMAK mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-03-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1584 for pncbrokerage.net html (9 KB)

The Respondent is: Khalil Ahmad, 147-A, Roanoke Street, Woodbridge, New Jersey 07095, USA.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The domain name in dispute is: . The registrar for the disputed domain name is: Network Solutions Incorporated (NSI) of 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Herndon, Virginia 20170, USA.   3. ...The Respondent is in default in these proceedings and thus has made no attempt to show legitimate rights or interests in the disputed domain name. Thus, in the presence of credible Complaint evidence, the Panel finds the Respondent has no legitimate rights or interests in the disputed domain name (Talk City, Inc. v. ...

2001-01-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0684 for bhpbillion.com html (15 KB)

Names 1 of Ramdaspeth, Maharashtra, India. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Fabulous.com. 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2010-06-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-2716 for afvandevorst.com html (13 KB)

The Respondent is Sunqi Feng of Suqian, Jiangsu, China, self-represented. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with eName Technology Co., Ltd. ...The Complainant essentially contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to its trademarks for A.F. VANDEVORST, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and that the disputed domain name was registered, and is being used in bad faith. ...

2019-01-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0341 for line-onlyfan.com html (12 KB)

The Respondent is Theerapat Pasongpan, Thailand. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”). 3. .../Wolter Wefers Bettink/ Wolter Wefers Bettink Sole Panelist Date: March 16, 2022 ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Fenix International Limited v. Theerapat Pasongpan Case No. D2022-0341 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2022-04-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4618 for onlyfans88.com pdf (141 KB)

The Respondent is fgfgf yty, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-01-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-2502 for sharedoterra.com pdf (163 KB)

The Respondent is Whois Agent (391174183), Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc., United States / George Washere, Panama. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint, together with the amended Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2022-09-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2480 for us-fenwicklaw.com pdf (143 KB)

The Respondent is oliver matthew, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Complainant contends the disputed domain name is being used solely for purposes of fraudulent emails using the disputed domain name. 5. ...

2025-08-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0234 for arcelorgroup.com pdf (141 KB)

The Respondent is fan jian fei, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Hongkong Kouming International Limited (the “Registrar”). 3. ...On or around January 17, 2024, the Disputed Domain Name resolves to a page at offering the Disputed Domain Name for sale for CNY 22,868. 5. ...

2024-04-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0546 for gitlaw.cloud pdf (201 KB)

The Respondent is MONICA M VIGGIANI, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Complainant’s GT mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-04-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1284 for baccaratshopus.com pdf (141 KB)

The Respondent is Shi Jinyin, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...In addition, the Respondent’s registration of the disputed domain name has prevented the Complainant from using the disputed domain name to reflect its business. ...

2024-05-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1294 for carrefourmarket.online pdf (139 KB)

The Respondent is ARNAUD FLORIAN SOHKAMTE KINGNI, Illimito, Cameroon. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Porkbun LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Maier Sole Panelist Date: May 20, 2024 ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Carrefour SA v. ARNAUD FLORIAN SOHKAMTE KINGNI, Illimito Case No. D2024-1294 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. ...

2024-05-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-2540 for lexapro24h.top pdf (141 KB)

The Respondent is Billi Villi, United States of America (“United States”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. .../Alvaro Loureiro Oliveira/ Alvaro Loureiro Oliveira Sole Panelist Date: August 14, 2024 ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION H. Lundbeck A/S v. Billi Villi Case No. D2024-2540 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. Procedural History 4. ...

2024-08-23 - Case Details