Respondent is Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (“Registrar”).
3. ...Stanek
Sole Panelist
Date: May 14, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v. Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico
Case No. D2024-1353
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-05-16 - Case Details
Respondent is Mu Guo, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...- The disputed domain name consists of the SANOFI mark followed by “-asia,” a descriptive geographic
term. The disputed domain name suggests that it is related to Complainant’s operations in Asia...
2024-12-18 - Case Details
Respondent is Patrick Overton, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s
trademarks; (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and (iii)
Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2025-03-17 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...As can be seen in The Canadian Hockey Association and The Canadian Olympic
Committee v. Lin Lin, WIPO Case No. D2016-0322, the panel found that the content of the website which
purported from the disputed domain name could be relevant to analyze if there was any intent by a
respondent to create confusion with a complainant’s trademark.
...
2022-11-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is سعید خلیلی ,co, Tajikistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Web Commerce Communications
Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-01-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hong Li, Hong Li, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-05-01 - Case Details
Respondent is Jamie Douglas, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-12-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is 任艺伟 (Yi Wei Ren), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with West263 International Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the SYENSQO mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the
disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Egon Hunt, Estonia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu.
...O’Farrell
Sole Panelist
Date: December 16, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Fortune Pig SL, Jorge, SL v. Egon Hunt
Case No. D2024-4361
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-12-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is MEI WANG, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Instead, the Complainant claims the disputed domain name has been used to
redirect users to a page listing the disputed domain name for sale at USD 1,450.
...
2025-09-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nick Peplow, Mango Tango Ltd, Thailand.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Panel finds the MARLEY’S MUTTS mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name omitting only
an apostrophe, which is punctuation that cannot be represented in a domain name. ...
2025-04-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Brian Desbarres, techni toiture 45, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Wix.com Ltd. .../Elise Dufour/
Elise Dufour
Sole Panelist
Date: December 2, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Technitoit v. Brian Desbarres, techni toiture 45
Case No. D2025-3995
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-12-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is finne finnew, Pitcairn, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Moreover, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s domain name under which its main business is
established, namely, . ...
2025-10-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Wu Yu, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
The Complainant requested that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
...
2024-11-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Michi Hofer, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Cronon AG Berlin, Niederlassung Regensburg (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel thus concludes that the Respondent must have been aware of this trademark and its reputation when it registered the disputed domain name, so that the disputed domain name was registered in bad faith (see Accenture Global Services Limited v. ...
2021-08-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Whoisguard Protected, Whoisguard, Inc. of Panama / Smart Web Hosting Srl, Adrian Claudiu Domut of Satu Mare, Romania / Ionut Vintila of Bucuresti, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists three elements that the Complainant must prove to merit a finding that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant or be cancelled:
(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and
(iii) the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2014-01-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jonas Schlichtenbrede, ICT OHG of Siegburg, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with united-domains AG (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2017-01-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Muhammad Fahim, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Porkbun LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name.
The Respondent is not using the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services...
2025-07-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Investments, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with 1API GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...It was not coincidence. In Drexel University v. David Brouda,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0067, the panel stated that “[…] rights or legitimate interests cannot be created where the user of the domain name at issue would not choose such a name unless he was seeking to create an impression of association with the Complainant”. ...
2020-11-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is TANUJ ANAND, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-09-29 - Case Details