The Respondent is Richard Swafford, Portland, Tennessee, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”)
is registered with OnlineNic, Inc. d/b/a China-Channel.com.
3. ...With respect to the element of “bad faith” registration of the Domain Name, the Panel finds it clear that Respondent had Complainant’s mark in mind when registering the Domain Name. ...
2006-03-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is Pioneer Enterprises of St Johns, Antigua and Barbuda.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Fabulous.com.
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on October 8, 2005.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The Complainant claims that:
1) The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark FLUOR DANIEL, the absence in the disputed domain name of the letter “O” being the only difference between the two names.
2) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name .
3) The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name. ...
2010-11-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is James Christ, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel f inds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name
contains the additional letters “a” and “r”, the Complainant’s mark is still readily recognizable within the
disputed domain name.
...
2024-01-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is sam nelson, sam nelson, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Web Commerce Communications Limited
dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-05-09 - Case Details
The Respondent
applied to register the disputed domain name on February 28, 2024, one day afterwards.
The disputed domain name has been offered for sale generally for 2850 USD.
5. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Dawn Osborne/
Dawn Osborne
Sole Panelist
Date: August 12, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Dragonsteel, LLC v. web master, Expired domain caught by auction winner....
2024-08-13 - Case Details
Customer 0161924409, Canada, / pat pipou, generali-ehpad, Israel.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...As to the absence of rights or legitimate interests, the Complainant argues that the Respondent:
i. has not been granted any authorization to use or register a domain name composed with the Complainant’s trademark;
ii. is not a licensed distributor of the Complainant;
iii. has not used the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods and services (paragraph 4(c)(i) of the Policy), given the fraudulent emails sent impersonating the Complainant;
iv. is not making any legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name without intent for commercial gain; and
v. has not been commonly known by the disputed domain name.
...
2021-10-14 - Case Details
Identical or confusingly similar (paragraph 4(a)(i))
The Complainant has registered the domain name .
This domain name is identical to Complainant’s trademark "mobilkom austria",
except that the domain name adds the generic top-level-domain ".com".
...WIPO Case No. D2000-0438,
Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. v. Hoon Huh).
The Complainant provided evidence of facts, which are clearly relevant to the
issue of whether the Respondent registered and is using the domain name in bad
faith.
...
2001-06-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lohan Medina, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Nicenic
International Group Co., Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Lastly, the Domain Name is not being used for
any genuine activities, considering the fact that the Domain Name resolves to an error page.
...
2023-06-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Xue, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The registrations of the
Trademarks predate the registration of the Domain Name.
The Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainants’ Trademarks. ...
2023-10-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lazlo Tokies, of United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Abacus America Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2008-02-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kaishce English, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...The Domain Name is identical to the HOWES PERCIVAL Mark.
b) There are no rights or legitimate interests held by the Respondent in respect of the Domain Name.
...
2023-09-21 - Case Details
The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on December 9, 2011. The Respondent uses the disputed domain name to operate an online pharmacy. ...In the absence of any Response by the Respondent, the Panel draws the inference that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name (Betsson Malta Limited v. John Droker,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0883) and that the requirement under paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy is satisfied.
...
2012-04-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Birgit Schweizer, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Web Commerce Communications
Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-05-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Super Privacy Service Ltd c/o Dynadot, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-10-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is RVA Network Solutions Inc., of Hialeah, Florida, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Go Daddy Software (the "domain name").
3. ...This poor content and the way that it is
presented leads the Panel to believe that this may constitute a hidden attempt
of Respondent to offer the domain name for sale to whomever may find it interesting.
4) In this case, as in the Telstra case (Telstra Corporation Limited
v. ...
2003-08-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Gnex Webmaster, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Euronext N.V. v. Gnex Webmaster
Case No. D2023-0749
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2023-04-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is YAnina, DostavkaProduktov of Kiev, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the "Registrar").
3. ...Conair Corp. v. Pan Pin, Hong Kong Shunda International Co. Limited,
WIPO Case No. D2014-1564. This is especially true in this case because the Respondent had used the Domain Name, which is very similar to the Complainant's domain name to redirect to a website offering competing services. ...
2017-03-29 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...See La Quinta Worldwide L.L.C. v. Satoshi Shimoshita,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1241, where the fact that disputed domain name contained the principal textual element of the complainant’s trademarks was considered insufficient to remove the confusing similarity.
...
2014-09-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nam, Republic of Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Megazone Corp., dba HOSTING.KR
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-07-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Abo Ali, Jordan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel notes that
the Domain Name was registered shortly after the announcement that the Saudi city Riyadh was to host
Expo 2030, which the Panel takes to explain the composition of the Domain Name. ...
2024-05-08 - Case Details