The Respondent is Ananda Rachel, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Combell NV (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant contends that the Respondent registered and used the disputed domain name in bad faith,
that the Respondent was fully aware of the existence of the Complainant when it acquired the disputed
domain name as the disputed domain name refers to the Complainant’s subsidiary company, and the
Respondent has been redirecting the disputed domain to a parking page.
...
2025-05-02 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
BankPlus v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc.
Case No. D2024-1449
1. The Parties
The Complainant is BankPlus, United States of America (“United States”), represented by Adams and Reese
LLP, United States.
The Respondent is Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc., Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...
2024-06-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ahmed Alshahri of Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”), is registered with eNom (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the Domain Name be transferred to the Complainant.
Tony Willoughby
Sole Panelist
Date: August 21, 2015
1 Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...
2015-09-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is lei guo of Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Xin Net Technology Corp. ...On the available record the website at the disputed domain name does not appear to be used for activities that would fall within the criteria of Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...
2016-02-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Karl Schnurch, EdenMedia, Seychelles.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Key-Systems GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-01-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Omar Ig, Morocco.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-05-22 - Case Details
Respondent is Mario Yagobi, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainants’
trademarks, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and (iii)
Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2024-12-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Muhammad Amin, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-02-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Withheld for Privacy Purposes, Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Sagar Bhardwaj, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...When applying the principles established under Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0903, the Panel finds that the Respondent’s services are not bona fide, and a finding of lack of legitimate interests in the disputed domain name is inevitable.
...
2021-08-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lee, Hocang of Ningtang, Hubei, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...In a similar case, LEGO Juris A/S v. Mohamed Ouattara / Integral Assets Ltd,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0564, regarding the domain name , decision was taken that: “The use of the word ‘education’ immediately after LEGO, a well-known trademark, far from distinguishes the disputed domain name from the trademark. ...
2014-08-11 - Case Details
Respondent is Hector Rice, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Isenberg
Sole Panelist
Date: January 29, 2025
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Constellation Energy Corporation v. Hector Rice
Case No. D2024-5276
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-02-04 - Case Details
The Center verif ied that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisf ied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Discussion and Findings
Under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy the Complainant carries the burden of proving:
(i) that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in
which the Complainant has rights, and
(ii) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and
(iii) that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2025-06-05 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks; (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and (iii) the Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...In addition, the criteria for a bona fide offering of goods or services as established in Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD, Inc,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0903, is not met.
By reproducing the Complainant’s registered trademark in the disputed domain name and the title of the Website, the Respondent is clearly suggesting to any Internet user visiting a website provided under the Disputed Domain Name that the Complainant (or an affiliated dealer of the Complainant) is the source of the Website, which it is not. ...
2022-01-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is albert pierre, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name. Finally,
the fact that the disputed domain name resolves to an inactive page prevents any proof of bona fide or even
fair use of the disputed domain name.
...
2022-07-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is S.P., Lamer of New Delhi, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Instra Corporation Pty Ltd. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2015-08-04 - Case Details
According to the Registrar’s WHOIS database, the Respondent is N-Holdings of Daegu, South Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is ("Domain Name"), registered with OnlineNic, Inc., dba china-channel.com, 2315 26th Ave., San Francisco, CA 94116, United States of America. The registration agreement, pursuant to which the domain name is registered, incorporates the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy").
3. ...
2003-02-10 - Case Details
Paragraph 3(c) of the Rules expressly permits a complaint to relate to more than one domain name where all
the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder.
The Registrar has confirmed that each disputed domain name is registered in the name of the Respondent.
...Group One Holdings Pte Ltd v. Steven Hafto
WIPO Case No. D2017-0183.
Generally speaking, a finding that a domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith
requires an inference to be drawn that the respondent in question has registered and is using the disputed
domain name to take advantage of its significance as a trademark owned by (usually) the complainant.
...
2024-08-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kal Kuchora, of Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Intercosmos
Media Group d/b/a directNIC.com.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2006-02-27 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
American Airlines, Inc. v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc.
Case No. D2024-3883
1. The Parties
The Complainant is American Airlines, Inc., United States of America (“United States”), represented by
Greenberg Traurig LLP, United States.
...Leppink
Sole Panelist
Date: October 30, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
American Airlines, Inc. v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc.
Case No. D2024-3883
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-11-01 - Case Details
The argument of the Complainant that Respondent has not used the domain names at issue is not correct, as said domain names are redirecting the web browser to the domain www.cellularoutlet.com, which is a legitimate use of a domain name on the Internet.
...The Complainant must satisfy that:
(i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and
(ii) the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of such domain name; and
(iii) the domain name has been registered in bad faith and is being used in bad faith.
6.1 Identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or a service mark
The domain names at issue incorporate the well-known trademark PHILIPS in its entirety, thus creating a certain visual and phonetical similarity between Respondent’s domain name and Complainant’s trade mark. ...
2002-07-19 - Case Details