Respondent is keny qwe, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Steinhardt
Sole Panelist
Date: August 4, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
MeridianLink, Inc. v. keny qwe
Case No. D2025-2379
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-08-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Richard Mark, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-09-02 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Requiring
Respondents to change the configuration and content of their website in order
to use a different domain name would cost at least $20,000 to $25,000, the amount
for which they offered to sell the disputed domain names to Complainant.
6. ...
2007-03-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Host Master, Transure Enterprise Ltd, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Above.com, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-06-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is cai yan you, yi wu shi yu ming dian zi shang wu shang hang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PSI-USA, Inc. dba Domain Robot (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-01-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is camilo david, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. ...v. camilo david
Case No. D2025-0854
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-05-05 - Case Details
Respondent is Auburn Nelson, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with HOSTINGER Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. .../Georges Nahitchevansky/
Georges Nahitchevansky
Sole Panelist
Date: December 18, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
AllSouth Federal Credit Union v. Auburn Nelson
Case No. D2023-4025
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-01-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Zhou Siyu, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 123-Reg Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The term “fashionnova” in the
disputed domain name is identical to this trade mark. The fact that the disputed domain name contains the
page 3
term “chic” does not alter the conclusion that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trade
mark FASHION NOVA. ...
2022-08-12 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the INSTAGRAM trademark, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...See Instagram, LLC v. Asif Ibrahim,
WIPO Case No. D2020-2552, which found that given the extent of use and reputation of the complainant’s INSTAGRAM trademark, the respondent could not have been unaware of the fact that the disputed domain names he chose could attract Internet users in a manner that is likely to create confusion for such users; and
b. the Respondent’s knowledge of the Complainant’s trademark at the time of registering the disputed domain name and the passive holding of the disputed domain name satisfy the bad faith requirement of paragraph 4(a)(iii)).
...
2022-02-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is daniel ariyanto, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...There is no evidence that the Respondent has registered the Domain Name as a trademark or acquired
trademark rights. There is no evidence of the Respondent’s use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the
Domain Name or a name corresponding to the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of
goods or services. ...
2025-05-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mauro Taggiasco, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on June 26, 2023. The disputed domain name was configured
with an email server. ...
2024-03-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bull Shaft, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. Bull Shaft
Case No. D2023-5302
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-03-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Garry Logan, Portugal.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-01-07 - Case Details
Respondent is Jagannadan Kulala, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s
trademarks, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and
(iii) Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2025-01-14 - Case Details
Respondent is company bcde, Viet Nam.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with Dominet (HK) Limited1 (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Dillionay Tony, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...Zadra-Symes
Sole Panelist
Date: September 15, 2025
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Dansko, LLC v. Dillionay Tony
Case No. D2025-3090
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-09-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jasper Lee, EMAC Group Limited, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-03-11 - Case Details
Respondent is Williams Tony, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainants’
trademarks, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and (iii)
Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2025-12-08 - Case Details
The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Newcastle United Football Company Limited v. Mfcvxcrtinn Parsvdkerc
Case No. D2025-3205
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-10-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is ZhangJindi, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Realtime Register B.V. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-11-27 - Case Details