A. Complainant The Complainant asserts trade mark rights in INTERCONTINENTAL and alleges that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the...name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or...
2011-09-06 - Case Details
. The disputed domain name, , is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s DISHOOM mark. The name contains the mark in its entirety. The addition of the...that the Complainant demonstrates that: - The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...
2018-02-05 - Case Details
contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its well-known SNIFFIES mark as a typosquatting variant, that the Respondent has no rights or...Confusingly Similar It is well established that where a domain name consists of a misspelling of a trade mark such that the mark is recognisable, as in this...
2023-05-24 - Case Details
recorded as 2001. It is well known. The Domain Name registered in 2017 is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark only substituting a letter “r...fair use. Registration of a domain name containing a sign confusingly similar to a famous mark to point to a site with links to the Complainant’s own web...
2021-12-02 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark; that the...have been met in this case. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar This element requires the Panel to consider two issues: first, whether the Complainant...
2021-11-01 - Case Details
confusingly similar to registered trademarks and the corporate name of the Complainant; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the...identical or confusingly similar to registered trademarks and the corporate name of the Complainant, the Complainant enclosed evidence of multiple...
2004-09-01 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant contends that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant...used in bad faith. B. Respondent Respondent did not reply to Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2008-03-10 - Case Details
Complainant. 5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant i. Domain Name Identical or Confusingly Similar to Complainant's Mark Complainant contends that the Domain...Names are confusingly similar to the Mark because the only difference between the Domain Names and the Mark is addition of the word “cares”. Complainant...
2009-05-07 - Case Details
for pay per click links. The Respondent has registered many other domain names containing the trade marks or signs confusingly similar to the trade...registered, inter alia , in the United States for car dealership and loan services since 2013. The Domain Name registered in 2020 is confusingly similar to the...
2021-04-27 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks; that the...disputed domain name; and (iii) the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar This element...
2020-01-06 - Case Details
that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...elements listed in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy have been satisfied: (i) the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2020-01-02 - Case Details
the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s 1LIFE trade mark; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s corporate name, but does not address the issue as to whether or not it is confusingly similar to...
2019-10-29 - Case Details
Complainant Confusingly Similar The Complainant submits that it owns several trademark registrations for the trademark BETVICTOR, including those listed in...BETVICTOR trademark. Accordingly, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered BETVICTOR...
2017-05-17 - Case Details
the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the service mark REED SMITH in which Complainant has rights, that Respondent has no rights or...must prove each of the following: 1) that the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark...
2015-02-24 - Case Details
must prove each of the following: (i) The domain name at issue is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark or service mark in which the...Rule 15(a), it is appropriate to apply rules and principles of American trademark law between the parties. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar As stated...
2003-06-24 - Case Details
50,000 without payment to the supplier. Summarizing its legal contentions, Complainant alleges that (1) the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to...Michael Robertson, WIPO Case No. D2000-0009). A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel agrees with Complainant’s allegation that the disputed domain...
2023-03-10 - Case Details
confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark, (2) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, and (3) the disputed domain...identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s TRADER JOE’S trademarks, (2) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name...
2023-08-11 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s SNCF trademarks, including...domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. (b) Rights or Legitimate Interests The Complainant contends that the Respondent cannot...
2011-10-21 - Case Details
the Policy, the Complainant must prove the following: (i) the Disputed Domain is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...with respect to each requirement. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has provided sufficient evidence that the Disputed Domain Names are...
2012-09-26 - Case Details
is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark. Specifically, the Complainant asserts (in pertinent part): (1) The domain name exactly...Complainant has rights in a trade or service mark, with which the Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar (Paragraph 4(a)(i)); and 2. The...
2008-02-18 - Case Details