A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainants have demonstrated that they own rights in the DR. MARTENS trademark. ...D2001-0032 (inter alia, and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the DR. MARTENS trademark with the word “the” and two hyphens, is confusingly similar to the Complainants’ DR. ...
2012-05-09 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainants have demonstrated that they own rights in the DR. MARTENS trademark. ...D2001-0032 (inter alia and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the DR. MARTENS trademark with the word “sale” is confusingly similar to the Complainants’ DR. ...
2012-05-09 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that each of the three elements specified in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy have been met and the Domain Name should be transferred.
Identical or Confusingly Similar
The sign "houshiboss" is confusingly similar to the Complainant's HUGO BOSS trade mark. ...Taken on its own the elements, "houshi" and "hugo" would not be considered similar, however the comparison of the Domain Name and trade mark as a whole especially given the independent distinctive significance of the element BOSS, renders the Domain Name to be confusingly similar to the HUGO BOSS trade mark as well. ...
2016-01-18 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name consists of the Complainant’s distinctive trademark MICHELIN with the letter “e” replaced by the letter “a”, followed by the word “tires”, and the gTLD “.com”.
...For all these reasons, the Panel concludes that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Respondent is not called “Michalintires” or anything similar. ...
2022-03-22 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant insists that that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s registered
trademarks, in that the disputed domain name leads with its OLYMPIC mark and that the contents of the
website to which the disputed domain name previously resolved, included linked five circles extremely similar
to Complainant’s trademarked five links symbol. ...Ahmed Syed, AdvertisingPulse
Case No. D2022-0228
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith...
2022-03-16 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name consists of the Complainant’s trademark, with the insertion of the letter “u” between the letters “car” and “van” and the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) “.com”. ...For all these reasons, the Panel concludes that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Respondent is not called “caruvana” or anything similar. ...
2021-04-13 - Case Details
It is also clear that by virtue of its widespread and long-standing use and the repute of the IWC Trademark that an unrelated entity or person using a similar domain name is likely to lead to members of the public being confused and deceived.
Complainant argues that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its IWC Trademark, in that it consists of the IWC Trademark with the addition of the generic term “replica”, and the gTLD “.org”. ...On this basis the Panel finds:
a) Complainant has rights in respect of the IWC Trademark.
b) The Domain Name is confusingly similar to the IWC Trademark.
Accordingly, the Panel is satisfied that the first element of the Policy has been met.
...
2013-03-11 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its own NATWEST trademark.
In furtherance of this contention the Complainant argues 4 points:
a) the disputed domain name is comprised of the dominant “Ntwest” element which is confusingly similar with its NATWEST trade mark;
b) that the inclusion of the “co-uk” suffix element in the disputed domain name, before the “.com” generic top level domain (gTLD), does not operate to distinguish an otherwise deceptively similar mark which takes as its main element an established trademark and cites Porsche AG v. ...In particular the Panel accepts that:
a) the principal element in the disputed domain name is the “ntwest” component which is closely similar to the Complainant’s mark NETWEST and notes the many instances where such features in “typosquatting” cases considered under the UDRP have been found to be confusingly similar;
b) the “co-uk” element and the “.com” gTLD are to be read down or disregarded in the analysis. ...
2013-01-04 - Case Details
Under the Policy this is sufficient to establish
that the domain name in dispute is identical or confusingly similar. See Magnum
Piering, Inc. v. The Mudjocker and Garwood S. Wilson Sr.,
WIPO Case No. ...D2000-0273 where
the panel found that the combination of Complainant’s mark YAHOO with
a number of generic words such as a city name or abbreviations for a country
name, gave rise to a domain name that was confusingly similar to the registered
mark of the Complainant.
The Panel concludes that the domain name in dispute is confusingly similar to Complainant’s registered mark.
...
2007-04-04 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has established that it has valid rights in the COOL HAND and COOL HAND POKER (logo) trademarks.
The domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s marks since the addition of one letter, “c”, does not alter the similarity to the otherwise similar word element of the COOL HAND POKER (logo) trademark. ...
2011-11-21 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel must find that the Complainant has a trademark or service mark and that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to that trademark or service mark for the Complainant to succeed.
...MasterCard Brasil,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1691, "mastercard-brasil.com" confusingly similar to MASTERCARD; Brunswick Family Boat Co. Inc. v. Andrea Chorbadjian,
WIPO Case No. D2013-1973, "baylinerbrasil.com" confusingly similar to BAYLINER.
...
2017-09-19 - Case Details
The Complainant’s Internet presence is extremely important to its business; by the end of fiscal year 2000, Internet sales to its customers reached nearly 50 percent of its revenue and averaged $40 million per day.
The disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to trademarks in which the Complainant has rights. If a domain name incorporates a famous mark in its entirety, it is confusingly similar to that mark despite the addition of other words.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel has disregarded the top level domain ‘.com’ for the purposes of comparison of each of the disputed domain names with the marks of the Complainant on the basis that this is a wholly generic element of a domain name.
...
2004-11-24 - Case Details
Respondent
The Complainant’s claim that the disputed domain name, and by inference the term “ABC Store”, is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark ABC SHOP, is disputed. The words “store” and “shop” are dictionary words that have similar meanings but the Respondent disputes that they are confusingly similar. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Based on the evidence submitted, the Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the ABC SHOP trademark.
...
2021-04-06 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
Identical or confusingly similar:
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its CARREFOUR and BANQUE CARREFOUR well-known trademarks because it imitates them.
...D2012-2001).
Besides the disputed domain name is also confusingly similar to the well-known CARREFOUR trademark.
As indicated above, the removing of the letter “r” is almost unnoticeable.
...
2019-06-21 - Case Details
International Electronic Communications Inc., WIPO
Case No. D2000-0270.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar
to Complainant’s AMAZON mark for purposes of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the
Policy. ...D2005-1131 ( confusingly similar to GEICO)....
2006-07-11 - Case Details
page 3
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has documented its ownership of various U.S. trademark registrations for the SOMALOGIC
mark, covering life science research and development services, as well as development testing services.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-11-14 - Case Details
Therefore, the Complainant considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks.
The Complainant also alleges that the addition of a generic Top-Level Domain name such as “.com” is irrelevant to determine whether a disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a protected mark or not.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The evidence presented demonstrates that the Complainant is the owner of international registrations for the trademark BOLLORÉ/BOLLORE. ...
2016-11-29 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant asserts that Respondent has registered and used the domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to the MEXSANA family of marks, which Complainant asserts includes its MEXANA mark. Complainant asserts that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the MEXSANA mark. Even Respondent noted the similarity. ...
2014-04-10 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant clearly has rights in the mark MASTERCARD, based on its long and extensive use and ownership of numerous trademark registrations worldwide.
The domain name is identical or at least confusingly similar to the MASTERCARD mark because it merely inserts two hyphens between “master” and “card”. ...
2007-09-13 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established that it is the owner of registered trademark rights in the mark ONLYFANS.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2024-03-15 - Case Details