About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 2341   document(s)s (0.031 sec)

Rows

<<  <  581 - 600  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1284 for legoartnft.com, legoartnfts.com, legosnfts.com pdf (295 KB)

LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries including the United States. The Complainant is also the owner of more than 1000 domain names containing the term LEGO. The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...

2022-06-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-4207 for legoprecast.com pdf (175 KB)

page 2 4. Factual Background The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, a worldwide known toymaker. LEGO branded products are marketed and sold for decades in more than 130 countries worldwide, through authorized licensees. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant holds rights in the LEGO trademark. The disputed domain name incorporates the Complainant’s trademark LEGO with an additional suffix, “precast”. ...

2023-01-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-2178 for legomindstormsnxt2toy.com html (14 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. AbdiPraja Case No. D2010-2178 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...The Respondent used the disputed domain name for a website which was headed “Lego Mindstorms Nxt 2.0” and which was devoted to promotion of the Complainant’s Lego Mindstorms NXT 2.0 product. ...

2011-05-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1617 for legoshopping.com html (14 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Tech Domain Services Private Limited Case No. D2009-1617 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches all over the world and the LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries. The LEGO brand is one of the most known trademarks around the world, due in part to decades of extensive advertising. ...

2010-02-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1550 for legogames.name html (15 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Nguyen Tien Luc a.k.a. Tien Luc Nguyen Case No. D2011-1550 1. The Parties Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...D2006-1315. Adding the word “games” to the trademark LEGO is not in creating any distinction since the word “games” is the name of the product associated with the trademark LEGO. ...

2011-11-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0291 for where-to-buy-lego.com html (14 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Contact Privacy Inc. Customer / Gunnlaugsson Magnus Case No. D2012-0291 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark LEGO. The only distinctive element of the disputed domain name is the trademark LEGO. The other elements, namely the word combination ”where-to-buy”, merely describe the process of searching for the goods marked LEGO and these words therefore don’t distinguish the disputed domain name from Complainant’s famous mark LEGO. ...

2012-05-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0617 for lego-harrypotterhogwartscastle.com html (14 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Nasirudin, EazySmart.com Case No. D2011-0617 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel is satisfied that the Complainant is the owner of numerous registered trademarks for the word LEGO and that for the purposes of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy the disputed domain name <lego-harrypotterhogwartscastle.com> is confusingly similar to the trademark LEGO. ...

2011-05-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1409 for mylegosuperstore.com html (23 KB)

The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the mark LEGO. The Panel also finds that the mark LEGO is well-known: see LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda, WIPO Case No. D2010-0840 (“LEGO is clearly a well-known mark”); LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator, WIPO Case No. D2010-1260 (“In the present case, the disputed Domain Names incorporate the Complainant’s well-known registered trademark LEGO”); and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...

2011-11-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1989 for legopop.art pdf (147 KB)

The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries, including in Lebanon. The Complainant is the owner of a large number of trademark registrations for LEGO, including the following: - Lebanon trademark registration no. 62805 for LEGO (word mark), registered on March 11, 1994, in International class 28; - Lebanon trademark registration No. 61467 for LEGO (figurative mark), registered on September 2, 1993 in International class 28. The Complainant is also the owner of thousands of domain names containing the term LEGO, including , registered on August 22, 1995, which is used by the Complainant to promote its products under the trademark LEGO online. ...

2022-07-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-2853 for lego.cam html (20 KB)

Level 5 Corp, WIPO Case No. D2008-1692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo, WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr, WIPO Case No. D2009-0680; LEGO Juris A/S v. WhoisGuard, Inc. / Dary Webber, WIPO Case No. D2019-0204; LEGO Juris A/S v. Contact Privacy Inc. ...

2020-01-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1351 for lego-france.com html (19 KB)

A WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center DMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Christopher Kichenama-gourouvaya Case No. D2020-1351 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Complainant The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its trademark LEGO. This is because the dominant part of the Domain Name is identical to its trademark LEGO, and the addition of the hyphen and geographical term “france” does not diminish the confusing similarity between the Domain Name and Complainant’s LEGO trademark. ...

2020-08-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2133 for legos.net html (13 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Frederik Soleimani Case No. D2012-2133 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...The Complainant has provided a list of trademark registrations that it owns worldwide for LEGO, filed e.g. in the United States of America. These trademarks are referred to collectively hereafter as the “LEGO Trademark”. ...

2013-01-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-0993 for thelegosworld.com html (14 KB)

Besides, the magazine Time has classified LEGO as the no. 1 among the most influential toys of all time, in an article published in 2014. The trademark LEGO is registered worldwide. ...It features a number of articles which do clearly recall the Lego toys and figurines and the universes for which Lego has obtained licenses, including Star Wars and Harry Potter models. ...

2019-07-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1030 for legohouse1914.com html (14 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. TheChakan Case No. D2018-1030 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...“The trademark LEGO is among the best-known trademarks in the world, due in part to decades of extensive advertising, which prominently depicts the LEGO mark on all products, packaging, displays, advertising, and promotional materials. ...

2018-08-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0939 for legoninjago.com html (9 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. F.H.U. Betternet Rafal Biegun Case No. D2011-0939 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...The LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries. The Complainant also owns more than 1000 domain names containing the mark LEGO. ...

2011-08-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0737 for lego2012.com html (8 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant is the holder of the LEGO trademark and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products (see Annex 6 of the Complaint). ...The Complainant holds numerous registrations for the mark LEGO; it has evidenced registrations for the trademark LEGO in several countries including the United States. ...

2012-06-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DSE2021-0025 for legoshoppensverige.se html (5 KB)

Factual Background The Petitioner is a Danish company and the holder of several trademark registrations for LEGO, as example a European trademark registration No. 000039800, LEGO, registered on October 5, 1998, and the Domain Name was registered in December 2020. ...The Domain Holder is not known by that name nor does it hold rights in the name (LEGO). The Domain Name was obviously registered with the intention of referencing Petitioner's LEGO trademark in order to generate traffic and income through a website. ...

2021-10-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2343 for legouk.info html (21 KB)

Rampe Purda, WIPO Case No. 2010-0840; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator; WIPO Case No. 2010-1260; LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr, WIPO Case No. D2009-0680; LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp., WIPO Case No. D2008-1692 and; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo, WIPO Case No. ...

2013-02-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1016 for legohanoi.com html (13 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Hoang Van Cuong Case No. D2016-1016 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden. ...The dominant part of the disputed domain name comprises the term “lego”, identical to the registered trademark LEGO. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is clearly confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark LEGO. ...

2016-08-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1151 for lego.dad pdf (177 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Holding A/S v. Baris Can Gulum Case No. D2025-1151 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Examining the question of bad faith registration, the Panel notes that: (i) the Complainant’s trademark has been protected for decades, substantially predating the date of registration of the disputed domain name; (ii) previous UDRP decisions have consistently found the distinctive and well-known character of the LEGO mark, as demonstrated in LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp, WIPO Case No. D2008-1692 and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...

2025-05-30 - Case Details