About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 2341   document(s)s (0.031 sec)

Rows

<<  <  561 - 580  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1295 for legoedu.com pdf (139 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Lego Juris A/S v. Yeon o Jung Case No. D2022-1295 1. The Parties The Complainant is Lego Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...The LEGO trademark was listed as number 1 Consumer Superbrand by Superbrands UK in 2019, and the Lego Group was named number 1 on the list of the world’s Top 10 Most Reputable Global Companies of 2020 by the Reputation Institute. ...

2022-06-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1306 for legodisplaycase.com, legodisplays.com html (11 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Onstad Case No. D2011-1306 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...The Complainant is a member of the world famous Lego Group of Companies which has through itself, its predecessors and licensees used the trademark LEGO for over sixty years. ...

2011-10-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0909 for legocitycom.com html (12 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant is the owner of trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...

2010-08-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-3760 for legotrump.wtf, legotrumpsol.com pdf (164 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Loftuch Cheeck, Whois Agent, Netlify Inc Case No. D2024-3760 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...According to evidence presented by the Complainant, they have both resolved to a website displaying an image of a minifigure of Donald Trump and a model of the White House, both apparently constructed from LEGO toys. The title of the website, “LEGO TRUMP”, is displayed in the LEGO logotype on a red background. ...

2024-11-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0433 for potterlego.com, stormslego.com pdf (78 KB)

The Complainant is the owner of the LEGO trademark, including but not limited to: - China Trademark registration No.135134 for LEGO [figurative mark] registered on January 5, 1980; - United States Trademark registration No. 1018875 for LEGO [typed drawing] registered on August 26, 1975. ...The Complainant further argued that the term “storms” with the Complainant’s LEGO trademark is likely to heighten confusion, as it is closely similar to the Complainant’s “LEGO Mindstorms” product lines, while the addition of “potter” closely resembles the Complainant’s “LEGO Harry Potter” line of toys. ...

2023-04-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0729 for lego-edu.com pdf (171 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. xiaohai Wu, heshengshiyeyouxiangongsi Case No. D2022-0729 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches worldwide and its LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries, including in China. The Complainant is the owner of the LEGO trademark and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products worldwide, including but not limited to, China Trademark Registration No. 10176185 for LEGO, registered on January 14, 2013. ...

2022-05-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-2391 for kidstoyslego.com html (18 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Amtom Maoeiro Case No. D2021-2391 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Complainant The Complainant alleges that it is the owner of the well-known trademark LEGO. In the Complainant’s view, the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its LEGO trademark. Because the dominant part of the Domain Name is LEGO, the addition of the words “kidstoys” does not mitigate the confusion and will have no impact on the overall impression of the Domain Name. ...

2021-09-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0158 for legokidsworld.com html (16 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. n/a, Domain For Sale Case No. D2010-0158 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...The Panel is also satisfied that the Complainant has established that LEGO is a well-known trademark. The disputed domain name contains the Complainant's mark LEGO in its entirety, with the added suffix “kidsworld”. ...

2010-04-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2016-0027 for legoman.com.au html (24 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant, based in Denmark, is the owner of LEGO and other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...The Complainant’s LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries. Moreover, the Complainant is the owner of over 5,000 domain names containing the term “lego”, including . ...

2016-08-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1237 for cdlego.com html (14 KB)

争议域名网站提供有关淘宝网热销减肥产品的排行榜。 5. 当事人双方主张 A. 投诉人 投诉人主张争议域名与投诉人享有权利的LEGO商标混淆性相似,理由如下: (1) 争议域名的主要部分“lego”与投诉人的注册商标LEGO完全相同; (2) 争议域名包含的前缀“cd”不影响对争议域名的整体印象,对确定争议域名与LEGO商标的相似性无关。 ...6.2 分析与认定 A. 相同或混淆性相似 根据投诉人提交的证据材料,专家组接受投诉人有关其对LEGO商标享有注册商标专用权的主张。 本案争议域名的主体部分由“cd”和“lego”组成;其中,“lego”与投诉人的LEGO商标完全相同,而“cd”似乎并不具有特殊含义。 争议域名完整包含了LEGO商标。...

2012-09-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1109 for legocityreview.com html (10 KB)

The Complainant and its licensees – the “LEGO Group” – through their predecessors commenced use of the trademark LEGO in the United States of America during 1953. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar As stated in previous UDRP cases, it is indisputable that “LEGO is clearly a well-known mark” (see for instance LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator, WIPO Case No. ...

2013-09-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-0818 for legomojo.com pdf (151 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Holding A/S v. stan roble Case No. D2025-0818 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...In 2024 alone the Complainant successfully asserted its LEGO marks against more than 90 entities who attempted to use and register LEGO-formative domain names. ...

2025-05-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0126 for legominifigures.com html (18 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center 행정패널 결정문 LEGO Juris A/S v. Nurinet 사건번호: D2012-0126 1. 당사자 신청인: LEGO Juris A/S, 덴마크 빌룬드 신청인의 대리인: Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, 스웨덴 피신청인: Nurinet, 대한민국 경상북도 경주 2. ...따라서 분쟁도메인이름에서 신청인의 유명상표인 LEGO가 주된 구성부분을 차지하고 있고, 이러한 주된 구성부분 뒤에 일반명칭인 “minifigures”를 추가하는 경우, 분쟁도메인이름과 LEGO 상표는 혼동을 야기할 정도로 유사하다고 판단할 수 있다. 더군다나 신청인은 1978년부터 “LEGO Minifigures”라는 이름으로 매우 인기 있는 작은 조각상제품을 생산, 판매해 왔는데, 분쟁도메인이름은 “minifigures”를 신청인의 유명한 상표인 LEGO의 뒷부분에 합쳐져 구성되어 있으므로 분쟁도메인이름과 LEGO 상표는 혼동을 일으킬 정도로 유사하다는 것이 보다 더 확실해진다. ...

2012-03-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0872 for legobobafett.com, legocitytrain.com, legocrane.com, legofarm.com, legohelicopter.com, legomini.com, legoracergame.com, legotank.com, legotruck.com, legoyoda.com html (11 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainsByProxy.com / None Case No. D2011-0872 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services AB, Stockholm, Sweden. ...The LEGO trademark was first registered in the United States of America on August 26, 1975. The LEGO corporate group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...

2011-08-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0614 for legoego.com html (43 KB)

如在任何情况下英文裁决和中文译本有任何不一致,应以英文裁决作为作准文本。 4. 基本事实 投诉人,总部设于丹麦,是商标LEGO和其他与LEGO品牌有关的商标的玩具产品和其他LEGO品牌产品的所有人。投诉人和它的授权人,通过他们的前任者,在1953年于美利坚合众国(美国)使用商标LEGO,以识别它们制造及售卖的建筑玩具。 多年来,LEGO品牌玩具的生产和销售业务有显著增长。例如,在2009年,LEGO集团的收入超过28亿美元。投诉人的子公司和分支机构遍布世界各地,LEGO的产品销往超过130个国家和地区,包括中国。投诉人于2007年在北京开设了一家旗舰店。 ...

2012-09-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1249 for legolandwaterpark.com html (14 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant is the owner of the trademarks LEGO and LEGOLAND around the world, including the following registrations: Australian Registration No. ...The Complainant owns over 2,400 domain names containing the term “lego”. The Complainant has extensively advertised and promoted the LEGO trademark on all products, packaging, displays, advertising and promotional materials. ...

2014-09-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1951 for legolandminicities.com, legolandminicity.com, legolandnewyorkcity.com html (15 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. John Sasson Case No. D2012-1951 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...Factual Background Complainant states that it has used the LEGO trademark since at least 1953 in connection with construction toys, that the LEGO trademark is among the best-known trademarks in the world, and that it has been identified by Superbrands UK as the eighth most-famous trademark in the world. ...

2012-12-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1152 for lego-eustore.shop pdf (178 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Holding A/S v. deng qingguo Case No. D2025-1152 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...page 2 4. Factual Background The Complainant, LEGO Holding A/S (formerly known as LEGO Juris A/S), a limited company incorporated in Denmark, operates a business in the field of construction toys and related products and is the owner of the worldwide well-known LEGO brand. ...

2025-05-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0790 for legohouseproperties.com pdf (50 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Brandee Carr, Legohouseproperties Case No. D2023-0790 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...The prestigious Time Magazine has ranked the LEGO toy “The Most Influential Toy of All Time” and previous UDRP panels have also recognized the well-known status of the LEGO trademark, in particular in the United States, where the Respondent is located (see LEGO Juris A/S v. ...

2023-04-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0069 for legoduplo.xyz pdf (144 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. LIU FEN Case No. D2023-0069 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns registered trade mark rights in various countries for its LEGO word mark and device mark registrations featuring the word DUPLO as the dominant element. The disputed domain name wholly incorporates the LEGO word mark and the Panel therefore finds that it is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trade mark rights for LEGO. ...

2023-03-01 - Case Details