In the absence of any license or permission from the
Complainant to use its trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed
domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.PA. v. Tang Hong, WIPO
Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy,
Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-02-23 - Case Details
Prior UDRP panels have held that bad faith can be found where a domain name is so
obviously connected with a well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection to the
trademarks suggests opportunistic bad faith (See LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No.
D2013-0091). Given the strong reputation and distinctiveness of the Complainant’s trademark, registration
in bad faith can be inferred.
...
2023-02-08 - Case Details
In the absence of any license or permission from the
Complainant to use its trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed
domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.PA. v. Tang Hong, WIPO
Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy,
Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-03-13 - Case Details
In the absence of any license or
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 5
permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate
use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.PA. v.
Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith,
Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-08-19 - Case Details
The Complainant points to previous UDRP decisions in which panels found that in the absence of any
license or permission from the complainant to use such widely-known trademarks, no actual or contemplated
bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed (LEGO Juris A/S v.
DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO
Case No. ...
2024-05-27 - Case Details
Prior UDRP panels have held that bad
faith can be found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that its very
use by someone with no connection to the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith (see LEGO Juris A/S
v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). Given the strong reputation and distinctiveness of the
Complainants’ trademarks, registration in bad faith can be inferred.
...
2023-01-05 - Case Details
In the Panel’s view, such conduct cannot be regarded as giving rise to rights or
legitimate interests on the part of the Respondent to register and use the disputed domain names (see, e.g.,
LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrei Novakovich, WIPO Case No. D2016-1513).
Furthermore, the Respondent has no right or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names resolving to
inactive websites at the time of the decision (see, e.g., Philip Morris USA Inc. v. ...
2022-08-25 - Case Details
UDRP panels have
consistently found bad faith within the meaning of paragraph 4(b)(iv) in cases involving similar unauthorized
domain name use (LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator, See PrivacyGuardian.org and Sun Chong,
WIPO Case No. D2019-2263).
...
2022-11-04 - Case Details
Such intentional targeting in
bad faith is only further underscored by WhoIs evidence proffered by Complainant to show that Respondent
has also targeted third party trademarks including CROCS, LEGO, NIKE, and TWITTER. Under the
circumstances, any good faith or otherwise legitimate uses are rather implausible.
...
2022-08-19 - Case Details
In the absence of any explanation from Respondent as to why and how Complainant’s Trade Mark found its way into the Domain Name and why Respondent might have a legitimate interest in the Domain Name, the Panel finds that Respondent’s conduct is not consistent with relevant rights or legitimate interests on Respondent’s part.”); LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2022-03-03 - Case Details
In the Panel’s view, such conduct cannot be regarded as giving rise to rights or legitimate interests on the part of the Respondent to register and use the disputed domain name (see, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrei Novakovich,
WIPO Case No. D2016-1513).
The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name resolving to an inactive website at the time of the Decision (see, e.g., Philip Morris USA Inc. v. ...
2022-03-01 - Case Details
In these circumstances, the Panel finds that the Oki Data test has not been passed by the Respondent (See LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrew Orr,
WIPO Case No. D2015-1311; Oath Inc. v. Adit Gupta,
WIPO Case No. D2020-2523).
...
2021-06-18 - Case Details
Given the reputation of the PATHE trademark and the unlikelihood of the Respondent selecting the disputed
domain name for registration by chance, the Panel infers that the registration of the disputed domain name
intended to draw income from the improper use of the connection to the Complainant was registration in bad
faith. (See LEGO Juris A/S v. Floyd Goddard/ Oneandone, Private Registration, WIPO Case No.
D2010-0544, the panel stated: “The Panel, in accordance with previous decisions issued under the UDRP,
is of the opinion that actual knowledge of the Complainant’s trademarks and activities at the time of the
registration of the disputed domain may be considered an inference of bad faith.”)
...
2022-10-10 - Case Details
This is a long-standing criterion to assess whether Respondent has right or legitimate interest in the disputed
domain name. (See LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues,
Fundacion Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case No. ...
2022-11-24 - Case Details
Prior panels have held that bad faith can be found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a
well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection to the trademarks suggests
opportunistic bad faith (see LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). Given the strong
reputation of the Complainant’s trademark, registration in bad faith can be inferred in the circumstances of
this case.
...
2022-11-22 - Case Details
This
is a long-standing criterion to assess whether Respondent has right or interest in the Disputed Domain
Name. (Also see, LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues,
Fundacion Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case No. ...
2022-10-27 - Case Details
D2018-1291, ; eBay Inc. v. ebayMoving / Izik Apo,
WIPO Case No. D2006-1307, ; LEGO Juris A/S v. DBA David Inc/ DomainsByProxy.com,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1290, .
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the VIRGIN and VIRGIN GALACTIC trademarks in which the Complainant has rights.
...
2021-10-21 - Case Details
D2020-2500 (“using the Domain Names to host fraudulent email addresses in aid of a phishing scam cannot be considered a legitimate reason for registering the Domain Name”); LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-11-09 - Case Details
This disruption is a further indicator of use in bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Aamir Abdul Wahid, Spiro Line Media,
WIPO Case No. D2019-0245.
(v) The Respondent’s website seems to violate the TikTok application’s terms of service, which in the circumstances of this case, and noting the use of the disputed domain name, further supports the Panel’s finding on the Respondent’s bad faith. ...
2021-07-06 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels considering this issue came to the same conclusion. Please see LEGO Juris A/S v. lin zhang,
WIPO Case No. D2020-0675. Therefore, the Panel disregards the gTLD for the purposes of this comparison.
...
2021-08-26 - Case Details