La adición de dichos términos no es suficiente para evitar que haya similitud en grado de confusión entre cada nombre de dominio en disputa y dicha marca (véase Inter Ikea Systems B.V. v. Luis Fernando Kosonoy Michel, Luis Fernando Kosonoy,
Caso OMPI No. DMX2011-0034, y Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., c. ...
2015-02-16 - Case Details
These registrations show Respondent has engaged in a bad faith pattern of conduct, satisfying paragraph 4(b)(ii) of the policy. See Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. v. Technology Education Center,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0522 (finding Respondent’s registrations of domain names containing trade marks owned by third parties was prima facie evidence of engaging in a pattern of conduct to prevent trade mark owners from reflecting their marks in a corresponding domain name); and Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES) v. ...
2011-03-08 - Case Details
It is also without relevance whether or not Respondent is actually getting revenue from the webpage itself.
In Inter Ikea Systems B.V. v. Daniel Woodson,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1933, also concerning a blog containing sponsored links, the panel stated that “The only rational reason for using such a domain name would be to attract some of the Complainant’s customers to Respondent’s site. ...
2013-02-22 - Case Details
Argento Beijing Trading Company,
Caso OMPI No. D2009-0610; Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. v. SC Agis International Sport S.R.L.,
Caso OMPI No. DRO2006-0001.
In merito all’altra questione preliminare consistente nella produzione supplementare effettuata dal Ricorrente il 21 gennaio 2012 (e consistente in uno scambio di e-mail tra le parti), questo Collegio ritiene di accettarla, in base al potere discrezionale conferito dagli articoli 10 e 12 delle Norme, sia perché essa si riferisce ad una circostanza verificatasi dopo il deposito del Ricorso, ma soprattutto perché sulla stessa il Resistente ha avuto la possibilità di replicare, cosa che ha fatto con la seconda parte della propria Risposta inviata al Centro in data 30 gennaio 2012; al punto 4 della seconda parte della Risposta, il Resistente oltretutto conferma il contenuto dei documenti aggiuntivi prodotti dalla Ricorrente.
4. ...
2012-02-29 - Case Details
Kim Hyungho,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0679; and Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. v. SC Agis International Sport S.R.L.,
WIPO Case No. DRO2006-0001).
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that Complainant has provided sufficient evidence showing that it is the owner of trademark registrations for the GAMESCOM mark which include: German word mark No. 30362609 for the mark GAMESCOM, registered on April 26, 2004 in classes 28, 35, 37, 41, 42; German word mark No. 302010027674, GAMESCOM, registered on December 21, 2010 in classes 9, 16, 25, 26, 28, 35, 38, 39, 41, 43; and CTM word mark no. 9879727, GAMESCOM, registered on November 7, 2011 in classes 16, 25, 26, 35, 39, 41, and 43. ...
2014-03-11 - Case Details
See Osram AG v. Execom,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0948; Inter Ikea Systems B.V. v. Luis Fernando Kosonoy Michel,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1971 and Automobili Lamborghini Holding S.p.A. v. ...
2012-08-17 - Case Details
Ganea Nicolae,
Cazul OMPI nr. DRO2002-0001; Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. v. SC Agis International Sport S.R.L.,
Cazul OMPI nr. DRO2006-0001; Auchan v. Web4comm Srl Romania,
Cazul OMPI nr. ...
2015-03-05 - Case Details
Zeynel Demirtas, WIPO Case
No. D2007-0768; Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. v. Evezon Co. Ltd, WIPO Case No. D2000-0437; Dell Computer
Corporation v. MTO C.A. and Diabetes Education Long Life, WIPO Case No. ...
2022-11-18 - Case Details
This has been held in many UDRP cases
(see, e.g., Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. v. Evezon Co. Ltd., WIPO Case No. D2000-0437; The British
Broadcasting Corporation v. ...
2022-10-21 - Case Details
A country name included in a disputed domain name is not a prominent part because it is likely to be recognized as indicating an overseas website of the disputed domain name. See Inter IKEA Systems B.V. v. Muhannad Mayyas,
WIPO Case No. D2016-0067 (); Millennium & Copthorne Hotels PLC, Millennium & Copthorne International Limited (MCIL) v. ...
2016-07-06 - Case Details
The Panel finds that the Respondent’s decision to include the ZYN trademark in the disputed domain names
alongside “ca” and “gb”, being the common abbreviation for Canada and United Kingdom, indicates a
deliberate intention to create a misleading association to attract Internet users for commercial gain,
constituting bad faith under paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy. See, e.g., Inter Ikea Systems B.V. v. Daniel
Woodson, WIPO Case No. D2011-1933; and Swedish Match North Europe, Philip Morris International, Inc.
...
2026-03-02 - Case Details
Respondent's bad faith registration and use of the disputed domain name
is further evidenced by Respondent's registration
of twelve other domain names comprising misspellings of the name of at least
one other well-known mail order and on-line catalog ROSS-SIMONS: ,
, , ,
, , , ,
, , ,
and (citing Inter-IKEA Systems B.V v. Technology Education
Center., WIPO Case No. D2000-0522 (August 7, 2000); Bell-Phillip
Television Productions v. ...
2004-04-27 - Case Details
Zeynel Demirtas,
Litige OMPI No. D2007-0768; Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. c. Evezon Co. Ltd,
Litige OMPI No. D2000-0437; Dell Computer Corporation c. MTO C.A. and Diabetes Education Long Life,
Litige OMPI No. ...
2015-06-02 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have held that such additions do not prevent a finding of confusing similarity
(see Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. v. Evezon Co. Ltd., WIPO Case No. D2000-0437; The British Broadcasting
Corporation v. ...
2023-05-24 - Case Details
A country name included in a disputed domain name is not a prominent part because it is likely to be recognized as indicating an overseas website of the disputed domain name. See Inter IKEA Systems B.V. v. Muhannad Mayyas,
WIPO Case No. D2016-0067 (); Millennium & Copthorne Hotels PLC, Millennium & Copthorne International Limited (MCIL) v. ...
2016-07-08 - Case Details
The Panel agrees with the Complainant’s argument that the Respondent knew about the Complainant and its goods and services. See Inter IKEA Systems B.V. v. Targetclix / Anh Vo,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1087 (“It is not conceivable that Respondent would not have had actual notice of Complainant’s trademark rights at the time of the registration of the Domain Names…. ...
2021-06-21 - Case Details
Above.com Domain Privacy/Transure Enterprise Ltd., Host Master,
WIPO Case No. D2012-1065; Inter IKEA Systems B.V. v. Above.com Domain Privacy / Ni How,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0387).
The Panel finds that the Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Trade Mark.
...
2020-09-30 - Case Details
FA0008000095417; Top Driver, Inc. v. Benefits Benefits,
supra; Express Messenger Systems, Inc. v. Golden State Overnight, supra;
and Geniebooks.com Corporation v. William E. Merritt, WIPO
Case No. ...The ownership of multiple domain names which correspond to third party trademarks
constitutes prima facie evidence of conduct falling within subparagraph 4(b)(ii)
of the Policy. See Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. v. Technology Education Center,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0522. In some cases,
as few as two (2) or three (3) domain name registrations have been sufficient
to establish that a Registrant has engaged in a pattern of registering domain
names that incorporate the trademarks of third parties. ...
2004-06-28 - Case Details
The Domain Names and Registrars
The disputed domain names , , and are
registered with Key-Systems GmbH.
The disputed domain names and are registered with
Above.com Pty Ltd.
...In addressing the
Complainant’s request, the Panel will consider whether: (i) the disputed domain names or corresponding
websites are subject to common control; and (ii) the consolidation would be fair and equitable to all Parties.
See Speedo Holdings B.V. v. Programmer, Miss Kathy Beckerson, John Smitt, Matthew Simmons, WIPO
Case No. D2010-0281, and WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third
Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”), section 4.11.2.
...
2023-05-24 - Case Details
Además, el Experto entiende que el Demandado ha intentado de manera intencionada atraer, con ánimo de lucro, usuarios de Internet a la página web de Europa Casino, creando una posibilidad de confusión con la identidad de los Demandantes que se acrecienta por la notoriedad y renombre alcanzados por éstos en el sector de casinos en línea (véanse Inter-IKEA Systems B.V v. Technology Education Center,
Caso OMPI No. D2000-0522; Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. ...
2010-03-22 - Case Details