About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

WIPO ADR for SEP/FRAND Disputes

In recent years, the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “WIPO Center”) has administered some 95 disputes relating to standard essential patents (SEPs) and fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) licensing negotiations. Under the WIPO Mediation Rules, the mediator facilitates licensing negotiations to help parties agree on FRAND licensing terms (“Deal Mediation”). In WIPO FRAND mediations where parties wish to involve an expert or a co-mediator with specific expertise (e.g., concerning essentiality, patent valuation), the WIPO Center is also available to assist with such appointment (including from its list of neutrals for patent standards).


  • Mediations between large SEP holders and implementers in Asia and Europe to facilitate the agreement of FRAND licensing/cross-licensing terms, often in connection with pending litigation in multiple jurisdictions.
  • Requests for WIPO Mediation relating to licensing negotiations between patent pool administrators and implementers in relation to ongoing unsuccessful patent licensing negotiations. These cases included parties from 21 jurisdictions (50% of cases involved parties based in Asia including China, India, Japan and the Republic of Korea). Some of these mediation requests prompted renewed licensing negotiations, prior to the appointment of the mediator.
  • Referral of SEP/FRAND cases to WIPO Mediation by IP courts in China, including parties from Europe and Asia.

WIPO ADR Services for SEP/FRAND Disputes

Model submission agreements

The WIPO Center makes available tailored model submission agreements that parties may use to refer a dispute concerning the determination of fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms to WIPO Mediation, WIPO Arbitration, WIPO Expedited Arbitration or WIPO Expert Determination. The WIPO model submission agreements seek to ensure a cost- and time-effective FRAND determination and have been developed further to a series of consultations conducted by the WIPO Center with leading patent law, standardization and arbitration experts from a number of jurisdictions. The WIPO Center also took into account comments made by some members and the Secretariat of the European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI). The following options are available:

WIPO Mediation options:

WIPO Arbitration options:

WIPO Expert Determination option:

Multi-tier model submission agreements:

The WIPO model submission agreements build on the standard WIPO Mediation, Arbitration, Expedited Arbitration and Expert Determination Rules and propose a set of optional FRAND-specific features. The WIPO model submission agreements can be adapted by parties in line with their needs. They also can be adapted for use in WIPO contract clauses. The WIPO Center is available to assist parties in such exercise upon request.

To facilitate submission of FRAND disputes to WIPO ADR, the WIPO Center has published the document WIPO ADR Options for FRAND Dispute Management and Resolution. It aims at helping parties and neutrals to understand and make use of procedural options that are available at different stages of the process.

WIPO Open-Ended List of Neutrals Specialized in SEP/FRAND Disputes

Effective proceedings to a large extent depend on the quality of the mediator, arbitrator or expert.  The WIPO Center maintains a special list of mediators, arbitrators and experts for patent standards.

These neutrals can be appointed by parties in cases under the WIPO Rules, but parties are also free to select mediators, arbitrators or experts from outside the WIPO Open-Ended List of Neutrals Specialized in SEP/FRAND Disputes.

Contact us

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (Geneva)
34, chemin des Colombettes
1211 Geneva 20
Switzerland

T +4122 338 8247
F +4122 740 370

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (Singapore)
Maxwell Chambers
28 Maxwell Road #02-14
Singapore 069120

T +65 6225 2129
F +65 6225 3568

For additional information arbiter.mail@wipo.int