About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

First WIPO Webinar for Judges on May 5, 2020: Delivering Justice for IP Cases during Covid-19 Confinement and Beyond

April 24, 2020

Judiciaries everywhere are facing obstacles in ensuring continued access to, and delivery of, justice at a scale that is unprecedented at the global level.  Is it possible for courts to effectively adjudicate IP disputes during a time of physical distancing, confinement and lockdown?  A number of national courts have taken up the challenge.  Virtual hearing rooms and electronic depositions are allowing courts to operate without prolonged disruptions, but not without questions on how to ensure parties’ right to a fair trial and to preserve the probative value of testimony through the remoteness of virtual conferences.

Join eminent jurists from three continents, Justice Colin Birss, High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Judge Du Weike, Supreme People’s Court of China, and Judge Kathleen M. O’Malley, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, for an interactive webinar to discuss their experiences of delivering justice remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to share reflections on the opportunities and challenges for courts in continuing to adapt to new circumstances in the future.

judgesforum2018_birss_240
Justice Colin Birss, High Court of England and Wales
judgesforum2018_omalley_240
Judge Kathleen M. O’Malley, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
judgesforum2020_du_240
Judge Du Weike, Supreme People’s Court of China

The webinar will address issues such as:

  • determining the appropriateness of remote adjudication for different stages of IP litigation,
  • dealing with the specificities of IP cases in a virtual context,
  • legal and procedural adaptations to enable virtual judicial case management,
  • reducing risks associated with new technology and geographical separation of participants, and
  • safeguarding fundamental concerns such as open justice, privacy and due process.

It will also cover lessons learned and examine whether potential reductions in time, cost and carbon footprint may lead to an increased use of technology in future courtrooms, and impact the evolution of the judicial administration of IP.

The webinar will be conducted in English on May 5, 2020 (14.00–15.00 CEST).  Participation is open to judges only.