About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Women’s Participation in PCT System Now Systematically Measured

July 7, 2017

For the first time, in 2017 the yearly review of the PCT System contains data and analysis on women’s participation in the international patent system. WIPO is now taking a structured, systematic approach to identifying and measuring the share of women filing for patents through the PCT System.

At a side event to the twenty-sixth session of the Standing Committee on the Law of Patents (SCP), which took place in July this year, Carsten Fink, WIPO’s Chief Economist, stressed the United Nations system’s commitment to gender equality, as reflected in the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). WIPO’s Economics and Statistics Division that he heads has been actively working on quantifying women’s participation in international patenting.

Video: Watch the discussions on measuring women’s participation in patenting at the SCP side event in full.

A problem in plain sight

The number of women (or men for that matter) listed on patent applications filed via the PCT System had previously not been measured as there is no requirement for the applicant to indicate their gender. Yet having data on women’s and men’s share in the innovation process could help us to address imbalances in the field of innovation and creativity. Such regular, reliable data could assist guide decision-makers to produce truly evidence-based policies.

Solution: the Worldwide Gender Name Dictionary

The Worldwide Gender Name Dictionary is essentially an inventory of traditionally male and female names.  It was constructed using 14 different sources containing 6.2 million names used in 182 countries and covering 12 languages. WIPO created the tool with help of researcher Gema Lax Martinez, who is currently based at the University of Lausanne. Using the Dictionary, Ms. Martinez was able, with a high degree of certainty, to attribute 96% of the 9 million names of inventors and individual applicants in PCT System data to either women or men. The names are also cross-referenced with nationalities and other factors, in order to take into account national and cultural differences.

The Worldwide Gender Name Dictionary is available to the public free of charge on WIPO’s website. WIPO invites anyone interested to use and improve the tool.

What next?

The share of applications with women inventors is still quite low, not reaching one third of total applications.  Looking at the current rate of increase in the number of women inventors, only in 2076, will we will reach gender balance.

Bruno Le Feuvre, Statistical Analyst, WIPO Economics and Statistics Division

Kyle Bergquist, WIPO’s Data Analyst, explained the potential for the dataset generated by using the Worldwide Gender Name Dictionary: “[thanks to this new data] my colleagues and I are like kids in a candy store – we don’t really know what to pick or where to go because it’s all amazing.”  Some of the exciting new developments to come in how WIPO uses this tool include:

  • identifying gender in Hague and Madrid System statistics;
  • increasing the range of sources behind the Worldwide Gender Name Dictionary;
  • refining gender indicators; and
  • linking to different data sources.

Mr. Bergquist showed that geo-location data could visually show how countries such as China and the Republic of Korea lead other countries in terms of the share of women listed in patent applications.  A close-up look reveals the variance across regions and the way that specialization can play an important role.  For example, leveraging the data you can spot visually that Hartford, a U.S. city specialized in mechanical engineering, suffers from disproportionately low participation of women as compared to Boston or New York.

Find out more

  • Measuring women’s participation in international patenting PPT, Measuring women’s participation in international patenting, Gema Lax Martínez, University of Lausanne, Bruno Le Feuvre, WIPO, Economics and Statistics Division, Kyle Bergquist, WIPO, Economics and Statistics Division Geneva, July 6, 2017