Об интеллектуальной собственности Обучение в области ИС Обеспечение уважения интеллектуальной собственности Информационно-просветительская работа в области ИС ИС для ИС и ИС в области Информация о патентах и технологиях Информация о товарных знаках Информация о промышленных образцах Информация о географических указаниях Информация о новых сортах растений (UPOV) Законы, договоры и судебные решения в области ИС Ресурсы в области ИС Отчеты в области ИС Патентная охрана Охрана товарных знаков Охрана промышленных образцов Охрана географических указаний Охрана новых сортов растений (UPOV) Разрешение споров в области ИС Деловые решения для ведомств ИС Оплата услуг в области ИС Органы по ведению переговоров и директивные органы Сотрудничество в целях развития Поддержка инновационной деятельности Государственно-частные партнерства Инструменты и сервисы на базе ИИ Организация Работа с ВОИС Подотчетность Патенты Товарные знаки Промышленные образцы Географические указания Авторское право Коммерческая тайна Академия ВОИС Практикумы и семинары Защита прав ИС WIPO ALERT Информационно-просветительская работа Международный день ИС Журнал ВОИС Тематические исследования и истории успеха Новости ИС Премии ВОИС Бизнеса Университетов Коренных народов Судебных органов Генетические ресурсы, традиционные знания и традиционные выражения культуры Экономика Гендерное равенство Глобальное здравоохранение Изменение климата Политика в области конкуренции Цели в области устойчивого развития Передовых технологий Мобильных приложений Спорта Туризма PATENTSCOPE Патентная аналитика Международная патентная классификация ARDI – исследования в интересах инноваций ASPI – специализированная патентная информация Глобальная база данных по брендам Madrid Monitor База данных Article 6ter Express Ниццкая классификация Венская классификация Глобальная база данных по образцам Бюллетень международных образцов База данных Hague Express Локарнская классификация База данных Lisbon Express Глобальная база данных по ГУ База данных о сортах растений PLUTO База данных GENIE Договоры, административные функции которых выполняет ВОИС WIPO Lex – законы, договоры и судебные решения в области ИС Стандарты ВОИС Статистика в области ИС WIPO Pearl (терминология) Публикации ВОИС Страновые справки по ИС Центр знаний ВОИС Серия публикаций ВОИС «Тенденции в области технологий» Глобальный инновационный индекс Доклад о положении в области интеллектуальной собственности в мире PCT – международная патентная система Портал ePCT Будапештская система – международная система депонирования микроорганизмов Мадридская система – международная система товарных знаков Портал eMadrid Cтатья 6ter (гербы, флаги, эмблемы) Гаагская система – система международной регистрации образцов Портал eHague Лиссабонская система – международная система географических указаний Портал eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Посредничество Арбитраж Вынесение экспертных заключений Споры по доменным именам Система централизованного доступа к результатам поиска и экспертизы (CASE) Служба цифрового доступа (DAS) WIPO Pay Текущий счет в ВОИС Ассамблеи ВОИС Постоянные комитеты График заседаний WIPO Webcast Официальные документы ВОИС Повестка дня в области развития Техническая помощь Учебные заведения в области ИС Поддержка в связи с COVID-19 Национальные стратегии в области ИС Помощь в вопросах политики и законодательной деятельности Центр сотрудничества Центры поддержки технологий и инноваций (ЦПТИ) Передача технологий Программа содействия изобретателям (IAP) WIPO GREEN PAT-INFORMED ВОИС Консорциум доступных книг Консорциум «ВОИС для авторов» WIPO Translate для перевода Система для распознавания речи Помощник по классификации Государства-члены Наблюдатели Генеральный директор Деятельность в разбивке по подразделениям Внешние бюро Вакансии Закупки Результаты и бюджет Финансовая отчетность Надзор
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Законы Договоры Решения Просмотреть по юрисдикции

Латвия

LV117

Назад

Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 325 of July 24, 2001, on Procedures for the Performance of Customs Control Measures for the Protection of Intellectual Property

 Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 325 of July 24, 2001, on Procedures for the Performance of Customs Control Measures for the Protection of Intellectual Property

Disclaimer: The English language text below is provided by the Translation and Terminology Centre for

information only; it confers no rights and imposes no obligations separate from those conferred or imposed by the

legislation formally adopted and published. Only the latter is authentic. The original Latvian text uses masculine

pronouns in the singular. The Translation and Terminology Centre uses the principle of gender-neutral language in

its English translations. In addition, gender-specific Latvian nouns have been translated as gender-neutral terms, e.g.

chairperson.

Translation © 2001 Tulkošanas un terminoloģijas centrs (Translation and Terminology Centre)

Republic of Latvia

Cabinet

Regulation No. 325

24 July 2001

Procedures for the Performance of Customs Control Measures for the

Protection of Intellectual Property

Issued pursuant to Section 114,

Paragraph three of the Customs Law

I. General Provisions

1. These Regulations prescribe the procedures by which customs control measures are to be

performed to protect intellectual property, by prohibiting the release for free circulation,

exportation, re-exportation, customs warehousing, inward processing, processing under customs

control, temporary importation, temporary exportation, re-importation, importation to a tax-free

shop, exportation for processing, transit and abandonment for the benefit of the State, of

counterfeit and pirated goods.

2. If there is cause for suspicion that the relevant goods are counterfeit and pirated goods, the

release of such for free circulation, exportation, re-exportation, customs warehousing, inward

processing, processing under customs control, temporary exportation, re-importation,

importation to a tax-free shop, exportation for processing, transit and abandonment for the

benefit of the State shall be discontinued until the measures referred to in Paragraphs 19, 20, 21,

22 and 24 of these Regulations have been implemented.

3. These Regulations do not apply to non-commercial goods that are in the personal luggage of

natural persons and do not exceed the quantity specified with respect to tax relief.

II. Application to a Customs Authority and Examination thereof

4. In order to enforce and protect his or her rights, the holder of copyright, neighbouring rights,

trademarks or designs protected in Latvia, or his or her authorised person (hereinafter – holder of

rights), shall submit to the Central Customs Board of the State Revenue Service (hereinafter –

Central Customs Board) a written application regarding counterfeit and pirated goods

(hereinafter – application).

Translation © 2001 Tulkošanas un terminoloģijas centrs (Translation and Terminology Centre) 2

5. Information indicated in the application shall be the following:

5.1. a detailed description of the original goods and the suspected counterfeit or pirated

goods, so as to enable the customs authority to identify such;

5.2. the time period within which the holder of rights shall request the customs authority

in which counterfeit and pirated goods are located or might be imported, to take relevant

measures; and

5.3. the actual or suspected location of counterfeit and pirated goods (if it is known), or

the territorial customs authority in the territory of which counterfeit and pirated goods are

located or might be imported.

6. An application shall be accompanied by proof that the applicant is the holder of rights of the

relevant goods:

6.1. if the holder of rights submits the application, the following shall be deemed to be

proof:

6.1.1. with respect to registered rights or such rights regarding which a

registration application has been submitted, – a proof of registration or submission of an

application;

6.1.2. with respect to copyright, neighbouring rights, rights of a design work that

is not registered or not submitted for registration, – any proof confirming the status of the

holder of rights;

6.2. if the application is submitted by another person who has the right to the relevant

intellectual property, in addition to the proof referred to in Sub-paragraph 6.1 of these

Regulations, a document confirming the right of such person to the relevant intellectual property

shall be submitted; and

6.3. if the application is submitted by a representative of the holder of rights or a

representative of a person who has the right to utilise the relevant intellectual property, in

addition to the proof referred to in Sub-paragraphs 6.1 and 6.2 of these Regulations, a document

confirming the right of such person to dispose the relevant intellectual property shall be

submitted.

7. The application may be a once-only or with a specified term of validity.

8. The holder of rights shall also submit to the Central Customs Board, in accordance with the

procedures determined by the State Revenue Service, any other information known to him or her

that is necessary for the taking of a decision.

9. After examination of the application, the Central Customs Board shall notify, in writing, the

holder of rights or another person who has the right to utilise the relevant intellectual property,

regarding the decision.

10. If the Central Customs Board finds the application unsubstantiated, it shall indicate the

reasons for refusal to the applicant in writing. The holder of rights has the right to appeal the

decision of the Central Customs Board in accordance with the procedures set out in regulatory

enactments.

Translation © 2001 Tulkošanas un terminoloģijas centrs (Translation and Terminology Centre) 3

11. If the Central Customs Board finds an application to be substantiated, it shall specify a time

period within which the necessary customs control measures shall be taken. The Customs Board

may extend such time period on the basis of an application of the holder of rights.

12. If there is cause for suspicion that the goods are counterfeit or pirated goods, the Central

Customs Board shall, without delay, forward the decision by which the application has been

recognised as substantiated, to the customs authority responsible for the disposal of such goods,

as well as notify it of the time period within which customs control measures shall be taken.

13. The holder of rights whose application has been accepted shall notify the Central Customs

Board without delay if his or her rights have ceased with respect to the relevant intellectual

property.

14. If, on the basis of an application, customs control measures have been taken, and it is

determined that the relevant goods are not counterfeit or pirated goods, the holder of rights

whose provided information has been used to identify the goods, shall cover the following

expenses:

14.1. expenses of the persons who have incurred losses as a result of the measures taken

by the customs authority; and

14.2. expenses incurred while storing such goods under customs control.

15. If a holder of rights has not submitted an application or it has been acknowledged as

unsubstantiated, but the customs authority, when subjecting the goods to the customs procedures

referred to in Paragraph 1 of these Regulations, has cause for suspicion that the goods are

counterfeit or pirated goods, the customs authority shall notify without delay the Central

Customs Board of the alleged infringement of rights. The Central Customs Board shall notify

without delay the holder of rights (if such is known) or another person (if such is known) who

has the right of utilisation of the relevant intellectual property.

16. In the case referred to in Paragraph 15 of these Regulations, the customs authority is entitled

to terminate the release of goods for free circulation and, after notifying the Central Customs

Board, keep the goods for temporary storage under customs control for a time period not

exceeding 10 working days, so that the holder of rights may submit an application.

17. If the holder of rights has not submitted an application within the time period set out in

Paragraph 16 of these Regulations, the State Revenue Service shall act in conformity with the

requirements prescribed by regulatory enactments and take a decision with respect to the goods

regarding which there is cause for suspicion that they may be counterfeit of pirated goods.

18. In accordance with the powers vested in them by regulatory enactments with respect to

actions with counterfeit and pirated goods, customs authorities or other competent institutions

shall not be liable for the losses or damage caused due to such activities.

Translation © 2001 Tulkošanas un terminoloģijas centrs (Translation and Terminology Centre) 4

III. Customs Control Measures

19. The customs authority to which the decision of the Central Customs Board has been

forwarded in accordance with Paragraph 12 of these Regulations, shall determine, together with

the holder of rights, whether the goods conform to the description of the counterfeit or pirated

goods referred to in the decision. If the goods conform to the description, the customs authority

shall draw up a statement, in accordance with the procedures determined by the State Revenue

Service, regarding conformity of the goods to the description of counterfeit or pirated goods. The

statement shall be signed by the holder of rights and the responsible official of the customs

authority. The customs authority shall terminate release of such goods and shall act in

accordance with the procedures set out in regulatory enactments.

20. The customs authority shall inform, without delay, but not later than within two working

days, the Central Customs Board, the declarant of the goods and the holder of rights regarding its

actions.

21. At the request of the holder of rights, the customs authority or the Central Customs Board

shall provide him or her, in compliance with the requirements set out in regulatory enactments,

with information regarding the given name, surname, personal identification number and address

of the place of residence of the declarant of the goods and the recipient of the goods, or the

name, registration number and legal address of the undertaking (company). At the request of the

holder of rights, the Central Customs Board shall also provide him or her with information

regarding the given name, surname, personal identification number and address of the place of

residence of the manufacturer of the counterfeit and pirated goods and the consignor of the

goods, or the name, registration number, legal address of the undertaking (company) and the

quantity of the goods (if such information is known).

22. The customs authority shall give the holder of rights and the persons who have applied for

customs procedures for the goods, an opportunity to inspect the goods the release of which is

terminated.

23. During the inspection of goods the customs authority shall be entitled to take samples. If

necessary, the samples shall be sent to the holder of rights for the provision of an opinion.

24. The holder of rights shall provide the opinion, within 10 days from receipt of the samples of

goods, to the customs authority referred to in Paragraph 19 of these Regulations. If the holder of

rights cannot, due to substantiated reasons, provide an opinion within the time period referred to,

he or she may request extension of the time period by 10 working days. After the end of such

time period, the goods shall be released on condition that all customs formalities have been

completed.

IV. Closing Provision

25. Cabinet Regulation No. 43 of 9 February 1999, Regulations on the Customs Control

Measures for the Protection of Intellectual Property, is repealed (Latvijas Vēstnesis, 1999, No.

41/42).

Translation © 2001 Tulkošanas un terminoloģijas centrs (Translation and Terminology Centre) 5

These Regulations shall come into force on 28 July 2001.

Prime Minister A.Bērziņš

Minister for Finance G.Bērziņš