Об интеллектуальной собственности Обучение в области ИС Обеспечение уважения интеллектуальной собственности Информационно-просветительская работа в области ИС ИС для ИС и ИС в области Информация о патентах и технологиях Информация о товарных знаках Информация о промышленных образцах Информация о географических указаниях Информация о новых сортах растений (UPOV) Законы, договоры и судебные решения в области ИС Ресурсы в области ИС Отчеты в области ИС Патентная охрана Охрана товарных знаков Охрана промышленных образцов Охрана географических указаний Охрана новых сортов растений (UPOV) Разрешение споров в области ИС Деловые решения для ведомств ИС Оплата услуг в области ИС Органы по ведению переговоров и директивные органы Сотрудничество в целях развития Поддержка инновационной деятельности Государственно-частные партнерства Инструменты и сервисы на базе ИИ Организация Работа с ВОИС Подотчетность Патенты Товарные знаки Промышленные образцы Географические указания Авторское право Коммерческая тайна Академия ВОИС Практикумы и семинары Защита прав ИС WIPO ALERT Информационно-просветительская работа Международный день ИС Журнал ВОИС Тематические исследования и истории успеха Новости ИС Премии ВОИС Бизнеса Университетов Коренных народов Судебных органов Генетические ресурсы, традиционные знания и традиционные выражения культуры Экономика Гендерное равенство Глобальное здравоохранение Изменение климата Политика в области конкуренции Цели в области устойчивого развития Передовых технологий Мобильных приложений Спорта Туризма PATENTSCOPE Патентная аналитика Международная патентная классификация ARDI – исследования в интересах инноваций ASPI – специализированная патентная информация Глобальная база данных по брендам Madrid Monitor База данных Article 6ter Express Ниццкая классификация Венская классификация Глобальная база данных по образцам Бюллетень международных образцов База данных Hague Express Локарнская классификация База данных Lisbon Express Глобальная база данных по ГУ База данных о сортах растений PLUTO База данных GENIE Договоры, административные функции которых выполняет ВОИС WIPO Lex – законы, договоры и судебные решения в области ИС Стандарты ВОИС Статистика в области ИС WIPO Pearl (терминология) Публикации ВОИС Страновые справки по ИС Центр знаний ВОИС Серия публикаций ВОИС «Тенденции в области технологий» Глобальный инновационный индекс Доклад о положении в области интеллектуальной собственности в мире PCT – международная патентная система Портал ePCT Будапештская система – международная система депонирования микроорганизмов Мадридская система – международная система товарных знаков Портал eMadrid Cтатья 6ter (гербы, флаги, эмблемы) Гаагская система – система международной регистрации образцов Портал eHague Лиссабонская система – международная система географических указаний Портал eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Посредничество Арбитраж Вынесение экспертных заключений Споры по доменным именам Система централизованного доступа к результатам поиска и экспертизы (CASE) Служба цифрового доступа (DAS) WIPO Pay Текущий счет в ВОИС Ассамблеи ВОИС Постоянные комитеты График заседаний WIPO Webcast Официальные документы ВОИС Повестка дня в области развития Техническая помощь Учебные заведения в области ИС Поддержка в связи с COVID-19 Национальные стратегии в области ИС Помощь в вопросах политики и законодательной деятельности Центр сотрудничества Центры поддержки технологий и инноваций (ЦПТИ) Передача технологий Программа содействия изобретателям (IAP) WIPO GREEN PAT-INFORMED ВОИС Консорциум доступных книг Консорциум «ВОИС для авторов» WIPO Translate для перевода Система для распознавания речи Помощник по классификации Государства-члены Наблюдатели Генеральный директор Деятельность в разбивке по подразделениям Внешние бюро Вакансии Закупки Результаты и бюджет Финансовая отчетность Надзор
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Законы Договоры Решения Просмотреть по юрисдикции

Филиппины

PH118

Назад

Office Order No. 13-173, Series of 2013, Rules on Accreditation of Collective Management Organizations

 Rules on Accreditation of Collective Management Organizations

OFFICE ORDER No.1 3 - 173 Series of 2013

SUBJECT: RULES AND REGULATIONS ON THE ACCREDITATION OF COLLECTIVE MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS

Whereas, the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) IS mandated to administer and implement the State policies declared in Republic Act No. 8293, the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines (IP Code);

Whereas, Sec. 183 of the IP Code, as amended by Sec. 10 of Republic Act No. 10372, allows the owners of copyright and related rights or their heirs to designate a society af artists, writers, composers and other right·halders, commonly referred to as collecting societies or collective management organizations (CMOs), to collectively manage their economic and moral rights on their behalf, provided that they first secure the necessary accreditation from IPOPHL in order that they can enforce the nghts of their members:

Whereas, meetings with various copyright stakeholders have resulted in a call for IPOPHL to establish accreditation mechanisms for CMOs with the view of protecting both the right-holders and the users of protected works, taking into consideration the public interest, as well as the access to knowledge:

Now, therefore, IPOPHL hereby issues the following rules and regulations on the accreditation of CMOs:

RULEI GENERAL PROVISIONS

Section 1. Title. These rules shall be known as the "Rules on Accreditation of Collective Management Organizations".

Section 2. Coverage These rules and regulations shaH apply to:

a. Any CMO, which refers to a group of artists, writers, composers and other creators, or copyright/related rights holders whose primary purpose is to collectively manage copynght and/or related rights. including any or all of the following activities:

(i) negotiation with and grant of licenses to users of protected literary, scholarly, scientific and artistic works, derivative works, performances, sound recordings, audiovisual works and broadcasts;

(ill collection of royalties and other forms of remuneration for the use of protected literary, scholarly, scientific and artistic works, derivative works, performances, sound recordings, audiovisual works and broadcasts:

(ill) collection of proceeds In subsequent transfers of the originals of paintings, sculptures and manuscripts:

Republic of the Philippines INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE

Intellectual Property Center. 28 Upper Md:inley Rood. Mckinley Hill Town Center ForI Bonifacio. Taguig City 1634 Philippines

T: +632-2386300. F: +632-7980114. www.ipophil.gov.ph

(iv) collection of additional remuneration for subsequent communication or broadcast of a performance;

(v) collection of single equitable remuneration for the broadcast, other communication to the public or public performance of a sound recording; and

(vi) distribution of the abovementioned collections to the rights holders.

b. Any CMO established before the effectivity of these Guidelines and is engaged in any or all of the above cited activities. Such CMO shall, within three (3) months from effectivity hereof, apply for accreditation.

c. These rules and regulations shall also apply to entities or individuals who engage in any of the functions enumerated in item (a) of this section.

RULE II PROCEDURE FOR ACCREDITATION

Section 1. Minimum Requirements. Only groups or CMOs meeting the following minimum requirements may apply:

a. Registration as a non-stock, non-profit corporation;

b. Membership is composed of right-holders belonging to the sector whose rights shall be managed;

c. The General Manager or Executive Director, the heads of Documentation, Licensing, Distribution and Finance have at least sixteen (16) hours of training on copyright or any related topics relevant to the particular sector obtained from IPOPHL or other institutions offering IP courses or seminars, both local and abroad;

d. Managerial and administrative capability of enforcing the rights of its members.

Section 2. Documentary Requirements. A duly accomplished application form shall be submitted in duplicate to the Bureau of Copyright and Other Related Rights, along with the following documents:

a. Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws b. SEC Registration/BIR Registration/business permits and/or relevant

government licenses/registrations c. Organizational structure d. List of Board members and officers, with respective biodata e. List of members f. List of current licensees (if applicable) g. List of authorized collecting agents, with respective contracts of agency h. Business/Operations Manual (including published tariffs/rates per category

and distribution rules) i. Documents used in business:

(i) Membership Agreement/Deed of Assignment (ii) Reciprocal agreements, if any

(iii) Licensing Agreement j. Audited Financial Statements, if already in operation

Section 3. Application Fee. A non-refundable application fee in the amount of Ten Thousand Pesos (PhP 10,000.00) shall be paid by the applicant to cover expenses of the proceedings and administrative costs.

Section 4. Third Party Observation. Within one (1) week from filing, the application shall be published in the IPOPHL Website. Any interested party may submit written observations thereon to the Bureau of Copyright and Other Related Rights within thirty (30) days. The observations shall forthwith be communicated to the applicant who may comment on them within ten (10) days from receipt of said communication. The Bureau shall acknowledge and consider the observations and comment in making its decision, and include the same in the file of the application to which it relates.

Section 5. Decision of the Director of the Bureau of Copyright and Other Related Rights. The Director of the Bureau of Copyright and Other Related Rights, or, in his absence, any IPOPHL official who may be duly designated by the Director General, shall examine the merits of the application within thirty (30) days from filing thereof or from the receipt of the last observation or comment of the parties. After which, the Director or duly designated official shall render a decision granting or denying accreditation. The Director or duly designated official may obtain the assistance of experts in the government and/or private sector who have worked for at least ten (10) years in the relevant copyright industry, or have at least a masteral degree in the relevant field, when necessary to resolve the matter. The corresponding certificate shall be issued within one (1) week after the decision.

Section 6. Denial of Accreditation. Accreditation may be denied if:

a. The applicant does not comply with the provisions of Sections 1 and 2 of Rule II above.

b. The information supporting the application reveals that the CMO is unable to effectively manage and administer intermediary affairs as well as the rights of their members.

Section 7. Appeal to the Director General. The decision of the Director or duly designated official denying accreditation shall be appealable to the Director General, subject to the IPO Uniform Rules on Appeal, as amended.

Section 8. Effectivity of Accreditation. The accreditation shall be effective for a period of three (3) years starting from the date of issuance of the resolution granting the accreditation.

Section 9. Publication upon Approval of Accreditation. IPOPHL shall publish, in the IPOPHL Website, the accreditation certificates, statutes, rates for collecting licensing fees, and distribution mechanism of the accredited CMO.

RULE III EFFECTS OF ACCREDITATION

Section 1. Rights of an Accredited CMo. An accredited CMO has the right to:

a. Administer any or all of the following rights, depending on the nature of the work and the agreement with their members:

(i) reproduction (ii) transformation (iii) first public distribution (iv) rental (v) public display (vi) public performance (vii) communication to the public (viii) moral rights

b. Negotiate with and grant licenses to users of protected literary, scholarly, scientific and artistic works, derivative works, performances, sound recordings, audiovisual works and broadcasts;

c. Collect royalties and other forms of remuneration for the use of the abovementioned works, including proceeds in subsequent transfers;

d. Distribute the said collection to their members;

e. Sue and enforce administered rights.

Section 2. Duties of an Accredited CMo. The accredited CMO shall:

a. Ensure the faithful discharge of their obligations as well as compliance with applicable laws and regulations;

b. Submit audited financial statements on or before April 15 of each year and allow the same to be posted in the IPOPHL website;

c. Notify IPOPHL of meetings, which are, at least, open to its general membership, and welcome a representative to such meetings;

d. Submit to IPOPHL whatever requests for information involving the CMO and its stakeholders;

e. Comply with these rules and the orders of IPOPHL issued from time to time.

Section 3. Reporting of Changes. An accredited CMO, which has amended its statutes or has undergone any change relative to its business (including changes in authorized collecting agents, if any), shall notify the IPOPHL thereof by submitting the amendatory statutes or a summary of the changes within thirty (30) days from effectivity thereof or the occurrence of the change, as the case may be. If such change shall necessitate the amendment of the accreditation certificate, an amendment fee of One Thousand Pesos (PhP 1,000.00) shall be paid.

RULE IV POST-ACCREDITATION

Section 1. Renewal of Accreditation. At least thirty (30) days before the expiry of the accreditation, the accredited CMO may apply for renewal of the accreditation and shall submit only those requirements enumerated in Section 2 of Rule II that need to be updated. The Director or duly designated official shall consider the performance of the CMO in the past year and shall issue a resolution within fifteen (15) days from filing of the application for renewal. A renewal fee of Five Thousand Pesos (PhP 5,000.00) shall be paid upon filing.

Section 2. Suspension of Accreditation. Under any of the following circumstances, the Director or duly designated official shall suspend, motu proprio or at the instance of the members of the CMO, or an interested party, after giving the concerned CMO due notice and opportunity to be heard, the accreditation of said CMO if the following circumstances are found after accreditation:

a. The CMO or any Board member or officer thereof has been found (by final order or conviction) to have violated the Law on Copyright (Part IV, IP Code) or any related law, rules and regulations.

b. Any of the documents or information/data contained in the documents submitted by the CMO has been found to be false or untrue.

c. Failure to maintain its compliance with the provisions of Section 1 of Rule II above.

d. Failure to engage in any of the activities under Section 2(a) of Rule 1 within one year after accreditation.

e. Failure to observe the parameters for distribution of royalty collections.

f. Malicious breach of contract or fiduciary duty against any of its members, regarding the primary activities and the duties of an accredited CMO as set out in these Guidelines and/or the principles of transparency, efficiency and good governance, including the fair and proportionate representation of members in the CMO's governing bodies.

g. Failure to give proper accounting to its members.

Section 3. Effect of Non-accreditation, Denial, or Suspension of Accreditation. A CMO who has not applied for accreditation after the effectivity of these Guidelines, or whose application has been denied, or whose accreditation has been suspended, cannot engage in the activities enumerated in Section 2(a) of Rule I. However, the said CMO may re-apply for accreditation, or move for the lifting of the suspension, provided, that the ground/s for denial or suspension had ceased to exist and it has complied with the minimum requirements of Section 1 of Rule II above. Thereafter, the processing of the application shall proceed in accordance with these guidelines.

RULE V FINAL PROVISIONS

Section 1. Grace Period for Compliance with Application Requirements. Applicants shall have one year from the effectivity of these Guidelines to comply with all the minimum and documentary requirements set forth in Sections 1 and 2 of Rule II After the said period, applicants shall comply with all the said requirements at the time of filing of the application.

Section 2. Separability Clause. If any section or provision of these Rules shall be held to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect as completely as if the part held invalid has not been included therein.

Section 3. Furnishing of Certified Copies. The IPOPHL Financial Management and Administrative Services (FMAS) is hereby directed to immediately file three (3) certified copies of these Rules with the University of the Philippines Law Center, and one (1) certified copy each to the Office of the President, the Senate of the Philippines, the House of Representatives, the Supreme Court of the Philippines and the National Library of the Philippines.

Section 4. Effectivity. These Rules shall take effect after fifteen (15) days from publication in a newspaper of general circulation.

1U;1Lfv ATTY. RIc'ARDO R. BLANCAFLOR Director General