À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Parcourir par ressort juridique

Bélarus

BY005

Retour

Rules for the Recognition of a Trademark as a Well-Known Trademark in the Republic of Belarus approved by Order No. 2, dated August 9, 2001 of the State Patent Committee of the Republic of Belarus

 BY005: Marks, Order, 09/08/2001, No. 2

YH Collection of Laws for Electronic Access BELARUS

BY005EN Marks, Order, 09/08/2001, No. 2 page 1/5

Rules for the Recognition of a Trademark as a Well-Known Trademark in the Republic of Belarus

Order No. 2, dated August 9, 2001 Approved by the State Patent Committee of the Republic of Belarus

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Clauses

Chapter 1: General Provisions ........................................................ 1 - 4 Chapter 2: Application for the Recognition of a Trademark as a

Well-Known Trademark ............................................... 5 - 10 Chapter 3: Review of the Application ............................................ 11 - 16 Chapter 4: Decision of the Appeal Board ....................................... 17 - 19 Chapter 5: Publication of Information of the Well-Known

Trademark ..................................................................... 20 - 21

The present Rules for the Recognition of a Trademark as a Well-Known Trademark in the Republic of Belarus (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”) are laid down pursuant to Article 5, paragraph (1), subparagraph 1.3 of the Law of the Republic of Belarus on Trademarks and Service Marks No. 2181-XII (hereinafter referred to as “the Trademark Law”), dated February 5, 1993 (published in the Vedomosti [Gazette] of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Belarus, 1993, No. 13, Article 128; registered in the National Register of Legal Acts, 2000, No. 106, 2/222) and determine the procedure for and requirements in respect of the recognition of a trademark as a well-known trademark in the Republic of Belarus by virtue of Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Trademark Law, and Article 6bis, paragraph (1) of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (hereinafter referred to as “the Paris Convention”), dated March 20, 1883, as revised at Brussels on December 14, 1900, at Washington on June 2, 1911, at The Hague on November 6, 1925, at London on June 2, 1934, at Lisbon on October 31, 1958, and at Stockholm on July 14, 1967, and as amended on October 2, 1979.

Chapter 1 General Provisions

1. For the purposes of these Rules, a trademark well known in the Republic of Belarus shall be understood to mean a trademark protected on the territory of the Republic of Belarus by virtue of its state registration, or a trademark enjoying protection on the territory of the Republic of Belarus without registration by virtue of an international treaty to which the Republic of Belarus is party, which trademark was recognized as such pursuant to the procedure established by the present Rules.

2. A trademark recognized as a well-known trademark in the Republic of Belarus may, in accordance with Article 25, paragraph (1), subparagraph 1.2 of the Trademark Law, and Article 6bis of the Paris Convention, serve as a basis for rejecting another party’s request for

YH Collection of Laws for Electronic Access BELARUS

BY005EN Marks, Order, 09/08/2001, No. 2 page 2/5

the registration of such party’s trademark, or invalidating the registration of another party’s trademark, which is identical with or confusingly similar to the well-known trademark, intended for use in respect of any goods and/or services.

3. The determination of whether a trademark is a well-known trademark in the Republic of Belarus shall be made by the Examination Appeal Board of the State Patent Committee of the Republic of Belarus (hereinafter referred to as “the Appeal Board”) and based on the results of the examination of an application for the recognition of a trademark as a well-known trademark in the Republic of Belarus.

4. The examination of an application for the recognition of a trademark as a well-known trademark in the Republic of Belarus shall be governed by the “Rules for the Filing of Complaints and Oppositions and Review Thereof by the Examination Appeal Board of the State Patent Committee of the Republic of Belarus” approved by Order No. 1, dated May 17, 2001, of the State Patent Committee of the Republic of Belarus (registered in the National Register of Legal Acts, 2001, No. 55, 8/6151), and by these Rules.

Chapter 2 Application for the Recognition of a Trademark as a Well-Known

Trademark

5. The application for the recognition of a trademark as a well-known trademark (hereinafter referred to as “the application”) shall be filed with the Appeal Board by the owner which deems its trademark as well known, or by its representative dully authorized to do so (hereinafter referred to as “the applicant”).

6. The application shall indicate from what date the applicant deems its trademark as well known on the territory of the Republic of Belarus.

7. The application shall contain information with respect to factors from which it may be inferred that the trademark is well known. That information may, for example, include information concerning the following:

7.1. the degree of knowledge or recognition of the trademark in the relevant sector or sectors of the public in the Republic of Belarus, in particular, the degree of recognition of the trademark by actual and/or potential consumers of the relevant goods;

7.2. the duration, extent and geographical area of any use of the trademark on the territory of the Republic of Belarus. Information to this effect may include the following: the date of commencement of the trademark’s use; a list of locations where goods and/or services have been sold, in respect of which the trademark has been used; the sales volumes of such goods and/or services; the manner in which the trademark was used; the mean annual number of consumers of such goods and/or services; the market position of the manufacturer in a particular economic sector, etc.;

7.3. the duration, extent and geographical area of any promotion of the trademark, including advertising or publicity and the presentation, or fairs or exhibitions, of the goods and/or services to which the trademark applies;

YH Collection of Laws for Electronic Access BELARUS

BY005EN Marks, Order, 09/08/2001, No. 2 page 3/5

7.4. the duration and number of any registrations, and/or any applications for registration, of the trademark in foreign countries, to the extent that they reflect use or recognition of the trademark;

7.5. the extent to which the trademark was recognized as well known in any foreign country, including the country from which the trademark originates or from which the owner of the trademark comes;

7.6. the value associated with the trademark;

7.7. the results of a poll among consumers of the relevant goods and/or services on whether the trademark is well known, to be conducted by an independent specialized agency.

7.8. The applicant may provide any other information with respect to factors from which it may be inferred that the relevant trademark is well known in the Republic of Belarus.

8. Any information submitted by the applicant shall be confirmed by appropriate documents.

9. Five copies of a depiction of the trademark shall be attached to the application and filed together therewith. These shall be made on dense and durable paper (a photograph, a print, etc.), its size being 8cm by 8cm.

If the designation is a label, then the label itself may be attached.

If a designation is three-dimensional, then, where appropriate, an overall view thereof shall be filed together with all necessary projections of the filed designation in order to enable viewers to get a conclusive impression thereof, and the life-sized trademark itself.

Any designation shall be filed in such color or color combination in respect of which it is claimed that the trademark is well known.

Graphically, any such depiction shall be of high quality.

10. The application shall be accompanied by a document attesting payment of the prescribed fee.

Chapter 3 Review of the Application

11. In considering the application, the Appeal Board shall take into account all the information submitted to it by the applicant in accordance with Chapter 2, clause 7 of these Rules.

12. Where appropriate, the applicant may be requested to provide the Appeal Board with additional information in confirmation of the fact that the applicant’s trademark is indeed well known in the Republic of Belarus.

13. The applicant is not permitted to attach additional material to the application on his own initiative if such material contains the applicant’s request for the recognition of its

YH Collection of Laws for Electronic Access BELARUS

BY005EN Marks, Order, 09/08/2001, No. 2 page 4/5

trademark as well known beginning from a date other than the date indicated in the application later than one month before the date when the Appeal Board meets for the first time in respect of the relevant trademark.

14. The trademark shall be recognized as well known in the Republic of Belarus where the Appeal Board ascertains that factual material provided by the applicant in order to ground its claims is sufficient to confirm that the applicant’s trademark is well known in the Republic of Belarus.

Where the Appeal Board ascertains that information provided by the applicant is insufficient to confirm that the applicant’s trademark is well known in the Republic of Belarus, the application shall be refused.

15. Where information submitted by the applicant fully confirms that its trademark is well known in at least one relevant sector of the public in the Republic of Belarus, such trademark shall be recognized as well known in the Republic of Belarus. Relevant sectors of the public may, in particular, include:

15.1. actual and/or potential consumers of the type of goods and/or services to which the trademark applies;

15.2. persons involved in channels of distribution of the type of goods and/or services to which the trademark applies;

15.3. business circles dealing with the type of goods and/or services to which the trademark applies.

16. The trademark may be recognized as well known in the Republic of Belarus from a date other than the date indicated in the application if factual material submitted by the applicant fails to confirm that the applicant’s trademark is well known as from the date indicated in the application.

Chapter 4 Decision of the Appeal Board

17. In the event that the Appeal Board decides to approve the application and recognize the trademark as well known in the Republic of Belarus, such decision shall contain the following information:

— the date of the decision;

— a depiction of the well-known trademark;

— the date from which the trademark is recognized as well known in the Republic of Belarus;

— the name of the owner of the well-known trademark and the address of its location or residence.

YH Collection of Laws for Electronic Access BELARUS

BY005EN Marks, Order, 09/08/2001, No. 2 page 5/5

18. In the event that the Appeal Board decides to refuse the application, such decision shall state the grounds on which the refusal is based.

19. Any interested party may lodge a request for appeal against the decision of refusal of the Appeal Board in accordance with the legislation concerning the filing of complaints against the Appeal Board’s decisions.

Chapter 5 Publication of Information of the Well-Known Trademark

20. The trademark recognized as well known shall be entered in the List of Well-Known Trademarks in the Republic of Belarus. The List shall be kept by the State Patent Committee of the Republic of Belarus.

21. The State Patent Committee of the Republic of Belarus shall, immediately after the decision of the Appeal Board takes effect, publish information relating to the recognition of the trademark as well known in its official bulletin. The publication shall include the following:

— a depiction of the well-known trademark;

— the name of the owner of the well-known trademark;

— the effective date of the decision to recognize the trademark as well known in the Republic of Belarus;

— the date from which the trademark is recognized as well known in the Republic of Belarus.