About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

United Republic of Tanzania

TZ031-j

Back

Sabuni Detergents Limited v Murzah Oil Mills Limited, Commercial Case No. 256 of 2001, High Court of Tanzania, Commercial Division at Dar es Salaam

Sabuni Detergents Limited v Murzah Oil Mills Limited, Commercial Case No. 256 of 2001, High Court of Tanzania, Commercial Division at Dar es Salaam

Bwana, J

Date of Judgment: May 8, 2002

Facts

The plaintiff, the registered owner of the "Foma Limao" trade mark for a soap, began producing a soap with that mark in June 2000. In 2001, the defendant introduced a new soap bearing the trade mark "Takasa Limao" to the market. The soap had slices of lemon and drops on the packages similar to those in the "Foma Limoa" soap. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant infringed its trade mark "Foma Limao" by passing off its product. The plaintiff requested a perpetual injunction, the delivery or destruction of all the defendant's products and packages bearing the "TAKASA LIMAO" mark, and special and general damages.

Holding

Section 30 of the Trade and Service Mark Act, 1986, clearly states that no person can institute proceedings to prevent or recover damages for the infringement of an unregistered trade mark or service mark, but a person passing off the goods or services of another may be sued.

Decision

The trade marks "FOMA LIMAO" and "TAKASA LIMAO" are so similar that they are likely to deceive or cause confusion, and its product has similar or resembling packages, thus confusing consumers and making them believe that "TAKASA LIMAO" is the same as "FOMA LIMAO." By selling "TAKASA LIMAO," the defendant was passing off and did infringe the plaintiff trade mark "FOMA LIMAO." The court granted a perpetual injunction on the defendant (whether acting by its directors, officers, staff, agents or any one of them) from passing off and/or infringing the trade mark "FOMA LIMAO." The defendant was further ordered to destroy all products and packages bearing "TAKASA LIMAO." Any further use of the "TAKASA LIMAO" mark would be a breach of the above-imposed perpetual injunction and the defendant would then be required to pay general damages.