About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

United Republic of Tanzania

TZ037-j

Back

Tanzania Distilleries Limited v Vitamin Foods (1989) Limited, Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 15 of 1995, High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam

Tanzania Distilleries Limited v Vitamin Foods (1989) Limited, Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 15 of 1995, High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam

Mackanja, J.

Date of Judgment: February 18, 1999

Facts

The appellants were registered proprietors of the trade mark "Konyagi" with respect to gin. Since its registration, "Konyagi" has been extensively used and advertised, thus becoming well known in Tanzania. The appellants opposed the respondent's application to be registered as the proprietor of a trade mark for an alcoholic drink named "Giyangi," claiming that the respondent’s trade mark was not registrable because it lacked distinctiveness and looked similar to the appellant's mark, making it likely to deceive or cause confusion. After evaluating the evidence, the registrar dismissed the opposition. The appellants appealed the registrar’s decision.

Holdings

(i) The potential deception caused by the resemblance between competing marks must be evaluated by consumers or purchasers of goods upon which the marks are used, not retail dealers or businessmen owning restaurants.

(ii) The mere combination of two English words, or Kiswahili words, does not constitute an invention of a trade mark.

(iii) The word "distinctive," when used in the law of trade marks, is synonymous with the word "descriptive," and a word used as a trade mark must not only be distinctive; it must also be descriptive of the goods or manufacture in respect of which that word is registered.

(iv) Where a word has not completely come to be identified with the goods of a mark, the use of it by another party as a trade mark for an apparently identical product must be deceptive. An application for registration of such a trade mark will be rejected in regard to the public interest.

(v) The onus of proof lies on the applicant to prove that there will be no reasonable probability of deception if his trade mark is registered.

(vi) A manufacturer is guilty of deception if he undertakes to market his products under a trade mark to which he has no apparent connection.

Decision

The appeal was allowed. The word "Giyangi" does not appear to be invented; it is a coinage from two words, "Gin" and "yagi," which have been derived from "Konyagi." Since "Konyagi" and "Giyangi" are both gins, an ordinary consumer who is not sufficiently literate is likely to be deceived.