About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

United States of America

US205

Back

Indian Arts and Crafts Enforcement Act of 2000 (Public Law 106497, 114 Stat. 2219)

 Indian Arts and Crafts Enforcement Act of 2000

S. 2872

One Hundred Sixth Congress of the

United States of America AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act To improve the cause of action for misrepresentation of Indian arts and crafts.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indian Arts and Crafts Enforce- ment Act of 2000’’. SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO CIVIL ACTION PROVISIONS.

Section 6 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to promote the develop- ment of Indian arts and crafts and to create a board to assist therein, and for other purposes’’ (25 U.S.C. 305e) (as added by section 105 of the Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990 (Public Law 101–644; 104 Stat. 4664)) is amended—

(1) in subsection (a)— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting

‘‘, directly or indirectly,’’ after ‘‘against a person who’’; and

(B) by inserting the following flush language after para- graph (2)(B):

‘‘For purposes of paragraph (2)(A), damages shall include any and all gross profits accrued by the defendant as a result of the activities found to violate this subsection.’’;

(2) in subsection (c)— (A) in paragraph (1)—

(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end;

(ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

(iii) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(C) by an Indian arts and crafts organization on behalf

of itself, or by an Indian on behalf of himself or herself.’’; and

(B) in paragraph (2)(A)— (i) by striking ‘‘the amount recovered the amount’’

and inserting ‘‘the amount recovered— ‘‘(i) the amount’’; and

(ii) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(ii) the amount for the costs of investigation awarded

pursuant to subsection (b) and reimburse the Board the amount of such costs incurred as a direct result of Board activities in the suit; and’’; (3) in subsection (d)(2), by inserting ‘‘subject to subsection

(f),’’ after ‘‘(2)’’; and

S. 2872—2

(4) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(f) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of

the Indian Arts and Crafts Enforcement Act of 2000, the Board shall promulgate regulations to include in the definition of the term ‘Indian product’ specific examples of such product to provide guidance to Indian artisans as well as to purveyors and consumers of Indian arts and crafts, as defined under this Act.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.