About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Interpretation of Supreme People's Court on the Trial of Disputes of New Plant Varieties (Interpretation No. 5 of 2001), China

Back
Superseded Text  Go to latest Version in WIPO Lex
Details Details Year of Version 2000 Dates Entry into force: February 14, 2001 Promulgated: February 5, 2001 Adopted: December 25, 2000 Type of Text Implementing Rules/Regulations Subject Matter Plant Variety Protection

Available Materials

Main Text(s) Related Text(s)
Main text(s) Main text(s) Chinese 最高人民法院关于审理植物新品种纠纷案件若干问题的解释(法释[2001]5号)        

最高人民法院关于审理植物新品种纠纷案件若干问题的解释

 

法释 [2001] 5

 

 

  《最高人民法院关于审理植物新品种纠纷案件若干问题的解释》已于2000年12月25日由最高人民法院审判委员会第1154次会议通过。现予公布,自2001年2月14日起施行。

 

                          2001年2月5日 


  
  为依法受理和审判植物新品种纠纷案件,根据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》、《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》的有关规定,现就有关问题解释如下:

  第一条 人民法院受理的植物新品种纠纷案件主要包括以下几类:
  (一)是否应当授予植物新品种权纠纷案件;
  (二)宣告授予的植物新品种权无效或者维持植物新品种权的纠纷案件;
  (三)授予品种权的植物新品种更名的纠纷案件;
  (四)实施强制许可的纠纷案件;
  (五)实施强制许可使用费的纠纷案件;
  (六)植物新品种申请权纠纷案件;
  (七)植物新品种权权利归属纠纷案件;
  (八)转让植物新品种申请权和转让植物新品种权的纠纷案件;
  (九)侵犯植物新品种权的纠纷案件;
  (十)不服省级以上农业、林业行政管理部门依据职权对侵犯植物新品种权处罚的纠纷案件;
  (十一)不服县级以上农业、林业行政管理部门依据职权对假冒授权品种处罚的纠纷案件。

  第二条 人民法院在依法审查当事人涉及植物新品种权的起诉时,只要符合《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法第一百零八条、《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法第四十一条规定的民事案件或者行政案件的起诉条件,均应当依法予以受理。

  第三条 本解释第一条所列第(一)至(五)类案件,由北京市第二中级人民法院作为第一审人民法院审理;第(六)至(十一)类案件,由各省、自治区、直辖市人民政府所在地和最高人民法院指定的中级人民法院作为第一审人民法院审理。

  第四条 以侵权行为地确定人民法院管辖的侵犯植物新品种权的民事案件,其所称的侵权行为地,是指未经品种权所有人许可,以商业目的生产、销售该授权植物新品种的繁殖材料的所在地,或者将该授权品种的繁殖材料重复使用于生产另一品种的繁殖材料的所在地。

  第五条 关于是否应当授予植物新品种权的纠纷案件、宣告授予的植物新品种权无效或者维持植物新品种权的纠纷案件、授予品种权的植物新品种更名的纠纷案件,应当以行政主管机关植物新品种复审委员会为被告;关于实施强制许可的纠纷案件,应当以植物新品种审批机关为被告;关于强制许可使用费纠纷案件,应当根据原告所请求的事项和所起诉的当事人确定被告。

  第六条 人民法院审理侵犯植物新品种权纠纷案件,被告在答辩期间内向行政主管机关植物新品种复审委员会请求宣告该植物新品种权无效的,人民法院一般不中止诉讼。

 


Legislation Implements (6 text(s)) Implements (6 text(s)) Is amended by (1 text(s)) Is amended by (1 text(s)) Is superseded by (1 text(s)) Is superseded by (1 text(s))
No data available.

WIPO Lex No. CN373