About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

A Summary of IGC 30

June 6, 2016

WIPO’s Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC) concluded a week-long session on June 3, 2016. 

This was the second session under the new mandate for 2016-2017 PDF, mandate 2016-2017 and it addressed genetic resources.

The plenary began with a brief review of the “Indicative List of Outstanding/Pending Issues to be Tackled/Solved”.  The IGC then established an informal group to discuss the different approaches reflected in the Consolidated Document Relating to Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources and the core issues underpinning them.  The group comprised around 39 experts, with up to six delegates per region nominated by the Member States, as well as two indigenous representatives nominated by indigenous peoples participating in the session.  Other delegates were able to sit in as observers without speaking rights, with indigenous peoples also able to nominate two additional participants without speaking rights.  All other participants were able to follow the deliberations via audio feed in an adjoining room.

The plenary requested Ms. Margo Bagley (Mozambique) and Ms. Emelia Hernández (Mexico) to act as “facilitators” and they worked on further drafts of the text based on the discussions in the plenary and informals.  It was agreed that the “Second Revision of the Consolidated Document Relating to Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources”, as at the close of the session on June 3, 2016, be transmitted to the Thirty-Fourth Session of the IGC, in accordance with the Committee’s mandate for 2016-2017 and the work program for 2017. 

Voluntary fund

The Chair of the IGC and the Secretariat reminded the IGC, however, that the WIPO Voluntary Fund for Accredited Indigenous and Local Communities has now run out of funds and is in dire need of new contributions. 

Indigenous peoples and local community participation

The WIPO Secretariat facilitated, as usual, a meeting of the Indigenous Caucus (the Indigenous Consultative Forum) on the Sunday before the session began, May 29, 2016, at WIPO Headquarters.  The IGC Chair attended that meeting.  Additionally, the indigenous caucus organized daily meetings during the session.  The WIPO Secretariat continued to fund secretarial services (secretarial, interpretation and translation) for indigenous and local communities at the session, provided by the Documentation Centre for Indigenous Peoples (DoCip).

Indigenous panel

An indigenous panel PDF, indigenous panel, entitled “Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge: Sharing Indigenous and Local Community Experiences and Perspectives” was held on Monday morning.  The keynote speaker was Ms. Aroha Te Pareake Mead, Member of the Ngati Awa and Ngati Porou Tribes, New Zealand, and the Chair of the Commission on Environmental, Economic and Social Policy of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).  

The other two panelists were Mr. Willem Collin Louw, Secretary of the Khomani San Council, South Africa;  and Mr. Alancay Morales Garro, Member of the Brunka peoples, Costa Rica.  The Panel was chaired by Mr. Preston Hardison, Policy Analyst Tulalip Tribes, United States of America.  Many delegates welcomed and attended the Panel, thanks particularly to the high caliber of the panelists who addressed directly the issues under negotiation at the session.

Final report

The draft report of IGC 30 will be tabled for adoption at IGC 31 which will be held from September 19 to 23, 2016.

Attendance

The Committee was attended by participants from 91 countries and 36 observers.  It was chaired by Mr. Ian Goss of Australia, with Mr. Jukka Liedes of Finland and Ambassador Robert Matheus Michael Tene of Indonesia as Vice-Chairs.  A total of six organizations were accredited as new observers at the session.

Documents

Documents for IGC 30 are available on our website.

Video summary

Wend Wendland, Director of WIPO's Traditional Knowledge Division and Secretary of the IGC, sums up the session that addressed genetic resources.