Expression of HIV-Related Proteins in Plants
This application claims priority to previously filed and co-pending application U. S.
Serial No. 60/359,969 ; this application and all references cited herein are incorporated
herein by reference.
Work on this invention was funded in part with a grant from the United States
Government, the National Institute of Health, Grant No. 1R21A1048374-01, and the
Government has certain rights therein.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Over the past decade, transgenic plants have been successfully used to express a
variety of genes from bacterial and viral pathogens. Many of the resulting peptides
induced an immunogenic response in mice (Mason, H. S. , T. A. Haq, J. D. Clements,
C. J. Arntzen. 1998. Edible vaccine protects against Escherichia coli heat-labile
enterotoxin (LT): potatoes expressing a synthetic LT-B gene. Vaccine 16: 13361343;
Wigdorovitz, A. , C. Carrillo, M. J. Dus Santos, K. Trono, A. Peralta, M. C. Gomez,
R. D. Rios, P. M. Franzone, A. M. Sadir, J. M. Escribano, M. V. Borca. 1999. Induction
of a protective antibody response to foot and mouth disease virus in mice following
oral and parental immunization with alfalfa transgenic plants expressing the viral
structural protein VP1. Virology 255: 347-353), and humans (Kapusta, J. , M.
Modelska, M. Figlerowicz, T. Pniewski, M. Letellier, O. Lisowa, V. Yusibov, H.
Koprowski, A. Plucienniczak, A. B. Legocki. 1999. A plant-derived edible vaccine
against hepatitis B virus. FASEB J. 13: 1796-1799) comparable to that of the original
pathogen. Characterization studies of these engineered immunogens have proven the
ability of plants to express, fold and modify proteins in a manner that is consistent with
the native source.
express only a small antigenic portion of the pathogen or toxin, eliminating the
possibility of infection or innate toxicity of the whole organism and reducing the
potential for adverse reactions. Second, since there are no known human or animal
pathogens that are able to infect plants, concerns with viral or prion contamination are
eliminated. Third, immunogen production in transgenic crops relies on the same
established technologies to sow, harvest, store, transport, and process the plant
material as those commonly used for food crops, making transgenic plants a very
economical means of large-scale vaccine production. Fourth, expression of
immunogens in the natural protein-storage compartments of plant seed maximizes
stability, minimizes the need for refrigeration and keeps transportation and storage
costs low (Streatfield, S. J. , J. M. Jilka, E. E. Hood, D. D. Turner, M. R. Bailey, J. M.
Mayor, S. L. Woodard, K. K. Beifuss, M. E. Horn, D. E. Delaney, I. R. Tizard, J. A.
Howard. Plant-based vaccines: unique advantages. Vaccine 19: 2742-2748; Kapusta,
supra). Fifth, formulation of multicomponent vaccines is possible by blending the seed
of multiple transgenic corn lines into a single vaccine. Sixth, direct oral administration
is possible when immunogens are expressed in commonly consumed food plants, such
as grain, leading to the production of edible vaccines.
Numerous genes have been cloned into a variety of transgenic plants including
many enzymes that have demonstrated the same enzymatic activity as their authentic
counterparts. See, for example, expression of avidin in plants, U. S. Patent No.
5,767, 379; aprotinin expressed in plants, U. S. Patent No. 5,824, 870 and proteases
expressed in plants, U. S. Patent No. 6,087, 558.; Hood, E. E. , D. R. Withcher, S.
Maddock, T. Meyer, C. B. M. Baszczynski, P. Flynn, J. Register, L. Marshal, D. Bond,
E. Kulisek, A. Kusnadi, R. Evangelista, Z. Nikolov, C. Wooge, R. J. Mehigh, R.
Hernan, W. K. Kappel, D. Ritland, P. C. Li, and J. A. Howard, 1997, Commercial
production of avidin from transgenic maize: characterization of transformant,
production, processing, extraction and purification. Molecular Breeding 3: 291-306;
Pen, J. , L. Molendijk, W. J. Quax, P. C. Sijmons, A. J. van Ooyen, P. J. van den Elzen,
K. Rietveld, and A. Hoekema, 1992, Production of active Bacillus licheniformis a-
amylase in tobacco and its application in starch liquefaction. Biotechnology 10: 292-
296; Trudel, J. , C. Potvin, and A. Asselin 1992 Expression of active hen egg white
lysozyme in transgenic tobacco. Plant Sci. 87: 55-67.. Many additional genes have
been expressed in plants solely for their immunogenic potential, including viral
proteins (U. S. Patent Nos 6,034, 298; 6,136, 320; 5,914, 123 and 5,484, 719 (TGEV and
hepatitis B); Mason et al, (1998) supra ; Wigdorovitz, supra ; Kapusta, et al, supra ;
McGarvey, P. B. , J. Hammond, M. M. Dienelt, D. C. Hooper, Z. F. Fu, B. Dietzschold,
H. Koprowski, and F. H. Michaels. 1995. Expression of the rabies virus glycoprotein in
transgenic tomatoes. Biotechnology 13: 1484-1487; Thanavala, Y. , Y. -F. Yang, P.
Lyons, H. S. Mason, and C. J. Arntzen. 1995. Immunogenicity of transgenic plant-
derived hepatitis B surface antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 92: 3358-3361) and
subunits of bacterial toxins (Arakawa, T. , D. K. Chong, J. L. Merritt, W. H. Langridge.
1997. Expression of cholera toxin B subunit oligomers in transgenic potato plants.
Transgenic Res. 6: 403-413; Arakawa, T. , J. Yu, and W. H. Langridge. 1999. Food
plant-delivered cholera toxin B subunit for vaccination and immunotolerization. Adv.
Exp. Med. Biol. 464: 161-178; Haq, T. A. , H. S. Mason, J. Clements, and C. J. Arntzen.
1995. Production of an orally immunogenic bacterial protein in transgenic plants:
proof of concept of edible vaccines. Science 268: 714-716). Animal and human
immunization studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of many plant derived
recombinant antigens in stimulating the immune system. The production of antigen-
specific antibodies and protection against subsequent toxin or pathogen challenge
demonstrates the feasibility of plant derived-antigens for immunologic use.
Some of the first edible vaccine technologies developed include transgenic
potatoes expressing the E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin (LT-B), a Hepatitis B surface
antigen (HbsAg); (Thanavala, Y. , Y. -F. Yang, P. Lyons, H. S. Mason, and C. J.
Arntzen. 1995. Immunogenicity of transgenic plant-derived hepatitis B surface
antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 92: 3358-3361; Arntzen, C. J. , D. M. -K. Lam.<BR>
<P>2000. Vaccines expressed in plants. US Patent 6,136, 320; Lam, D. M. -K., C. J.
Arntzen, H. S. Mason. 2000. Vaccines expressed in plants. US Patent 6,034, 298;
Arntzen, C. J. , D. M. -K. Lam. 1999. Vaccines expressed in plants. US Patent 5,914, 123;<BR>
Lam, D. M. -K., C. J. Arntzen. 1997. Anti-viral vaccines expressed in plants. US Patent<BR>
5,612, 487; Lam, D. M. , C. J. Arntzen. 1996. Vaccines produced and administered
through edible plants. US Patent 5,484, 719), and a Norwalk virus surface protein
(Mason, H. S. , J. M. Ball, J. J. Shi, X. Jiang, M. K. Estes, C. J. Arntzen. 1996. Expression
of Norwalk virus capsid protein in transgenic tobacco and potato and its oral
immunogenicity in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93: 5335-5340). In addition to
human viral targets, two proteins specific for livestock viruses have also been
expressed in plants and fed to animals to test for immune responses, VP1 protein for
foot-and-mouth disease (Wigdorovitz, supra ; Carillo, C. , A. Wigdorovitz, J. C.
Oliveros, P. I. Zamorano, A. M. Sadir, N. Gomez, J. Salinas, J. M. Escribano, M. V.
Borca, 1998, Protective immune response to foot-and-mouth disease virus with VP1
expressed in transgenic plants. J. Virology 72: 1688-1690) and Transmissable
Gasteroenteritis Virus (Jilka, J. Immunogenicity of TGEV spike protein expressed in
transgenic maize seed: preliminary swine trials. PCT/US01/01148).
One of the most promising aspects of edible vaccines is the ability of orally
administered immunogens to stimulate a mucosal immune response (Ruedl, C. and H.
Wolf. 1995. Features of oral immunization. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 108: 334-339).
Mucosal surfaces, the linings of the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urogenital tracts,
play an important physical and chemical role in protecting the body from invading
pathogens and harmful molecules. The mucosal immune system is distinct and
independent of the systemic, or humoral, immune system, and is not effectively
stimulated by parenteral administration of immunogens (Czerkinsky, C. , A. M.
Svennerholm, and J. Holmgren. 1993. Induction and assessment of immunity at
enteromucosal surfaces in humans: implications for vaccine development. Clin. Infect.
Dis. 16 Suppl 2: S106-S116). Rather, the mucosal immune system requires antigen
presentation directly upon the mucosal surfaces (Jilka, J. Immunogenicity of TGEV
spike protein expressed in transgenic maize seed: preliminary swine trials. WO
01/51080 ; Bailey, M. R. 2000. A model system for edible vaccination using
recombinant avidin produced in corn seed. M. S. degree thesis, Texas A&M
University). Since most invading pathogens first encounter one or more of the mucosal
surfaces, stimulation of the mucosal immune system is often the best first defense
against many transmissible diseases entering the body through oral, respiratory and
urogenital routes (Holmgren, J. , C. Czerkinsky, N. Lycke, and A. M. Svennerholm.
1994. Strategies for the induction of immune responses at mucosal surfaces making
use of cholera toxin B subunit as immunogen, carrier, and adjuvant. Am. J. Trop. Med.
Hyg. 50: 42-54). It has been reported that mucosally administered SIV antigens can
induce systemic and mucosal immune responses (Moldoveanu, Z. , A. N. Vzorov, W. Q.
Huang, J. Mestecky and R. W. Compans. 1999. Induction of immune responses to SIV
antigens by mucosally administered vaccines. AIDS Research and Human
Retrovirusesl5 : 1469-1476 ; Yao, Q. , V. Vuong, M. Li, and R. W. Compans. 2002.
Intranasal immunization with SIV virus-like particles (VLPs) elicits systemic and
mucosal immunity. Vaccine 20: 2537-2545).
Significant recent research has focused on the development of a vaccine against the
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In 1981 the first cases of the acquired immune
deficiency syndrome (AIDS) were recognized, and unrecognized cases were believed
to have occurred for some years prior. In 1983 the agent responsible for AIDS, the
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was isolated and identified. Two types of HIV
have been identified, HIV-1, a highly virulent strain, is believed to be the cause of
most AIDS cases in the world, whereas HIV-2 is found in West Africa and spreading
into India. It is believed that the viruses were spread from other primates, such as the
chimpanzee, to humans.
There now exists a pandemic of AIDS resulting in high human mortality and
morbidity. The World Health Organization estimates 16.3 million people have died
from AIDS and that 34.3 million people live with HIV infection. As a result, there has
been considerable effort to study the disease and the virus which causes it, along with
producing a vaccine to prevent its further spread.
HIV is an enveloped retrovirus, belonging to the group of retroviruses called
lentiviruses. It is now believed the virus grows in the CD4 T-cells. The viron
contains two copies of the RNA genome, and after infection and integration into the
host cell chromosome, these are transcribed into DNA. These transcripts direct
synthesis of viral proteins and also form the RNA genome of new particles. These
new particles escape from the cell by budding from the plasma membrane.
Many recent studies have focused on the major envelope glycoprotein of HIV in
the study of subunit vaccines against HIV and the related simian immunodeficiency
virus, SIV. The protein gpl60 and a processed form of this protein (gpl20), for
example, have been shown to possess many of the important epitopes for antibody
recognition leading to virus neutralization. The simian equivalent of gpl20 is gpl30.
These all serve the same purpose, of providing a surface protein. They are the
dominant surface protein against which antibodies are raised.
HIV uses a complex of the two viral glycoproteins, gpl20 and gp41 in the viral
envelope. The gpl20 binds to the CD4 molecule of the cell, and then binds to a co-
receptor in the membrane of the host cell. The gp41 protein causes fusion of the cell
membrane and viral envelope, and the virus then enters the host cell. (For a thorough
discussion of HIV viral structure, see Immune Biology 5, The Immune System in
Health and Disease. 2001. C. A. Janeway, P. Travers, M. Walport, M. Shlomchik,
Garland Publishing, NY, NY, Chapt 11"Failures of Host Defense Mechanisms"pp.
425-469.)
Vaccines produced against gpl20 and gpl60 have focused, most recently, on
mucosal routes of immunization and have yielded variable yet promising results.
(gpl20 : Bergmeier, L. A. , E. A. Mitchell, G. Hall, M. P. Cranage, N. Cook, M.
Dennis, and T. Lehner. 1998. Antibody-secreting cells specific for simian
immunodeficiency virus antigens in lymphoid and mucosal tissues of immunized
macaques. AIDS 12: 1139-1147; Lu, X. , H. Kiyono, D. Lu, S. Kawabata, J. Torten, S.
Srinivasan, P. J. Dailey, J. R. McGhee, T. Lehner, and C. J. Miller. 1998. Targeted
lymph-node immunization with whole inactivated simian immunodeficiency virus
(SIV) or envelope and core subunit antigen vaccines does not reliably protect rhesus
macaques from vaginal challenge with SIVmac251. AIDS 12 : 1-10. gpl60 : (Ahmad,
S. , B. Lohman, M. Marthas, L. Giavedoni, Z. el Amad, N. L. Haigwood, C. J.
Scandella, M. B. Gardner, P. A. Luciw, and T. Yilma. 1994. Reduced virus load in
rhesus macaques immunized with recombinant gp 160 and challenged with simian
immunodeficiency virus. AIDS Res. Hum. RetroviruseslO : 195-204; Moldoveanu, Z.,
A. N. Vzorov, W. Q. Huang, J. Mestecky, and R. W. Compans. 1999. Induction of
immune responses to SIV antigens by mucosally administered vaccines. AIDS Res.
Hum. Retroviruses 15: 1469-1476) The gpl60 protein includes gpl20 and gp41. The
gpl20 protein extends upward from the viral membrane, whereas gp41 extends into
the membrane. Production of an antibody response has been shown when mammals
are exposed to the proteins; for, example the gpl60 protein has been able to produce
an antibody response in macaques and chimps (see e. g. , Murphy-Corb et al. , 1989.<BR>
<P>Science 246: 1293-1297; Emini et al. , 1989. J. Virol. 64: 3674-3678; Chakrabarti, S.<BR>
<P>1986. Nature 320: 535; Hahn, B. , 1985. Proc. Nat. Acad Sci USA 82: 4813; U. S. Patent
No. 6,511, 845), as has gpl20 in mice (Chakrabarti et al. 1986 Nature 320 (6062) 535-
7). The protein gpl20 is a heavily glycosylated protein. This glycosylation acts
equivalent to a protective jacket to the virus, and discourages antibody attack.
However, there is a vulnerable area in the"variable region"of the VI, V2 and V3
loops. These loops protrude out and are less glycosylated. However they
mutagenesize frequently, (3 x! 0-5 per nucleotide base per cycle of replication), which
leads to the generation of many variants of HIV within a single patient. Thus, the
human immune system cannot mount an effective serum antibody response once an
infection has taken hold. This allows time for the virus to enter the CD4 T-cells,
where it becomes quiescent as proviral DNA.
Thus, there has also been work to develop a more stable version of the viral
protein. A synthetic protein, which would in essence include all of the gpl20 protein
and half of the gp41 has been synthesized. This new protein is labeled gpl40, and has
been constructed to remove the normally occurring cleavage site (Binley, J. M. , R. W.
Sanders, A. Master, C. S. Cayanan, C. L. Wiley, L. Schiffner, B. Travis, S. Kuhmann,
D. R. Burton, S. L. Hu, W. C. Olson, and J. P. Moore. 2002. Enhancing the proteolytic
maturation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein. J. Virol.
76: 2606-2616). This form of the surface protein has a more"open"architecture which
may allow binding to antibodies that otherwise would not bind. It also is more stable
and can be extracted in the trimeric form (Schulke, N. , M. K. Vesanen, R. W. Sanders,
P. Zhu, M. Lu, D. J. Anselma, A. R. Villa, P. W. H. I. Parren, J. M. Binley, K. H. Roux,
P. J. Maddon, J. P. Moore and W. C. Olson. 2002. Oligomeric and conformational
properties of a proteolytically mature, disulfide-stabilized human immunodeficiency
virus type 1 gpl40 envelope glycoprotein. J. Virol. 76: 7760-7776).
One of the models which has been used in development of a vaccine is based on
the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), which infects Rhesus macaques, and is
closely related to HIV. Subunit vaccines have been made from gpl20 and tested on
chimpanzees.
The expression of gpl20, gpl40, or other subunits important to HIV infection,
produced in recombinant plants, could offer several exciting benefits to SIV/HIV
vaccine research. Large quantities of immunologically active recombinant antigen
could be produced, very economically, for research or vaccine production. The
immunogen could be produced in a safe, directly edible or easily purified form
allowing for studies on the efficacy of edible, oral, or parenteral HIV vaccines.
Multicomponent vaccines could easily be formulated from the seed of transgenic plant
lines to generate an increased chance for successful virus neutralization, in a stand-
alone vaccination strategy, as a booster, or in combination with other vaccines and
vaccination routes. Attempts have been made to express portions of an HIV related
protein in plant viruses, and using plant viruses to infect tobacco. Durrani et al.
(Durrani, Z. , T. L. McInerney, L. McLain, T. Jones, T. Bellaby, F. R. Brennan, N. J.
Dimmock. 1998. Intranasal immunization with a plant virus expressing a peptide from
HIV-1 gp41 stimulates better mucosal and systemic HIV-1-specific IgA and IgG than
oral immunization. J. Immunol. Meth. 220: 93-103) genetically engineered cowpea
mosaic virus to contain a 21 amino acid sequence from HIV gp41 and the virus was
then replicated in tobacco. Intranasal inoculation with that virus stimulated a mucosal
and systemic IgA and IgG response against the peptide in mice. Tobacco plants
inoculated with alfalfa mosaic virus particles carrying the V3 loop of HIV-1 produced
inoculum for mice which then produced neutralizing antibodies against HIV-1
(Yusibov, V. , A. Modelska, K. Steplewski, M. Agadjanyan, D. Weiner, D. C. Hooper,
H. Koprowski. 1997. Antigens produced in plants by infection with chimeric plant
viruses immunize against rabies virus and HIV-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 5784-
5788). Finally, Zhang et al. (Zhang, G. , C. Leung, L. Murdin, B. Rovinski, K. A.
White. 2000. In planta expression of HIV-1 p24 protein using an RNA plant virus-
based expression vector. Molecular Biotechnol. 14: 99-107) used the tomato bushy
stunt virus as an expression vector to produce HIV p24 protein. Successful expression
of HIV-related proteins in plants has not yet been achieved in monocotyledonous
plants.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention is the expression of HIV-related surface proteins in
monocotyledonous plants. In a further preferred embodiment, they are expressed in
graminae, and in a still further preferred embodiment are expressed in maize. The
proteins may be extracted from the plant, or the plant tissue used in various
applications. In one such application, the plant tissue can be orally administered to an
animal. In a still further preferred embodiment the invention relates to expression of
HIV-related proteins at levels such that commercial production in plants is practical.
In a preferred embodiment such levels are at least about 0.05% total soluble protein
and in a still further preferred embodiment are at least about 0.1% total soluble protein.
In yet another embodiment, a biomass is created by expressing the proteins in a
plurality of plants where at least some of the plants express the proteins, then
harvesting the biomass.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is the nucleotide sequence encoding SIVmac239 gpl30 (SEQ ID NO: 1)
Figure 2 is the amino acid sequence for SIVmac239 gpl30 (SEQ ID NO: 2)
Figure 3 is the nucleotide sequence for a maize Ubil promoter variant (SEQ ID
NO : 3)
Figure 4 shows a Western analysis of callus samples from five SVA and three SVB
events
Figure 5 shows a Western analysis of T, SVA seed.
Figure 6 is the nucleotide sequence encoding HIV gpl20 (SEQ ID NO: 4)
Figure 7 is the amino acid sequence for HIV gpl20 (SEQ ID NO: 5)
Figure 8 is the nucleotide sequence encoding HIV gpl40 (SEQ ID NO: 6)
Figure 9 is the amino acid for HIV gpl40 (SEQ ID NO: 7)
Figure 10 shows a Western analysis of HVA01 callus
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the expression of HIV-related proteins in plants, and
which express at high levels. At expression levels in excess of 0.05%, development of
a commercial production system becomes possible. In order for expression of such
proteins to be commercially viable, that is, the production costs of expressing the
proteins in plants is exceeded by amounts and value of the end product, expression
levels of at least about 0.05% should be met. Commercial production is still more
practical and achievable at levels of at least about 0.1%, and most preferably at levels
of at least about 0.5% or higher. This invention further relates to stable transformation
of plants with such proteins. As used herein stable transformation refers to the transfer
of a nucleic acid fragment into a genome of a host organism resulting in genetically
stable inheritance.
Reitz Jr. et al. set forth sequences encoding envelope proteins of HIV-1 strains.
Expression of a peptide of gp41 in a plant-derived virus, the cowpea mosaic virus has
been shown (Durrani et al. supra) ; a coat protein of alfalfa mosaic virus used as a
carrier molecule with the V3 loop of HIV-1 to infect tobacco plants (Ysibov et al.,
supra) ; and the tomato bushy stunt virus with the p24 protein used to infect tobacco
and cucumber plant cells. (Zhang et al, supra). However, expression of gpl20, gpl30,
gpl40, gpl60 and other SIV and HIV related proteins in monocots have not been
demonstrated. Monocots are often preferred host plants, since they have been studied
very extensively, can be adapted for higher levels of expression through plant breeding
and other techniques, and have been shown to be capable of expressing heterologous
proteins at high levels. With a large membrane-bound protein, as with the HIV-related
proteins, codon optimization is necessary for optimal expression in plants, and in
particular, in maize.
Genes which encode HIV-related proteins are available to one skilled in the art.
See for example the extensive work of Robert Gallo, reflected in such U. S. Patents as
Franchini et al, U. S. Patent No. 5,223, 423, describing the genomic clone of HIV-2;
Reitz Jr. et al., U. S. Patents Nos. 5,420, 030,5, 576,000 and 5,869, 313, describing
sequences encoding envelope proteins; Paolelth et al, U. S. Patent No. 5,863, 542,
showing sequences for gpl20 ; Berrada et al. (1995) J. Virol 69 : 6770-6778, Gao F. et
al. , (1996) J. Virol 1651-1657, also Kessous-Elbaz, U. S. Patent No. 5,850, 001, Kierry
et al, U. S. Patent No. 5,169, 763, showing gpl60 encoding sequences and their use;
Durrani et al, supra, showing a portion of the gp41 protein and Chada et al. , (1993) J.<BR>
<P>Virol. 67: 3409-3417, Respess et al. , U. S. Patent No. 6,333, 195, showing sequences
encoding gpl20 and gp41 ; Ysibov, supra, showing V3 loop-encoding sequences; Sia
et al. , U. S. Patent No. 6,395, 714 showing sequences encoding gpl40 ; and Zhang et al,
supra, showing p24. This is an exemplary list of the numerous sequences known to
those skilled in the art which can be employed in the present invention, and is meant to
be illustrative. The methods available for putting together a gene for improved
expression can differ in detail. However, the methods generally include the designing
and synthesis of overlapping, complementary synthetic oligonucleotides which are
annealed and ligated together and subjected to rounds of the polymerase chain reaction
to yield a full length gene with convenient restriction enzyme sites for cloning.
Oligonucleotide sequences can be chosen to maximize expression in the selected host
by selection codons that are commonly used in that host and by avoiding potential
messenger RNA destabilizing sequences.
Once the gene has been constructed it is placed into an expression vector by
standard sub-cloning methods. The selection of an appropriate expression vector will
depend upon the method of introducing the expression vector into host cells. A typical
expression vector contains prokaryotic DNA elements coding for a bacterial
replication origin and an antibiotic resistance gene to allow for the growth and
selection of the expression vector in the bacterial host; a cloning site for insertion of an
exogenous DNA sequence, which in this context would code for the protein of interest;
eukaryotic DNA elements that control initiation of transcription of the exogenous
gene, such as a promoter; and DNA elements that control the processing of transcripts,
such as transcription termination/polyadenylation sequences. It also can contain such
sequences as are needed for the eventual integration of the vector into the plant
chromosome.
In a preferred embodiment, the expression vector also contains a gene encoding a
selection marker which is functionally linked to a promoter that controls transcription
initiation and a terminator that controls the termination of transcription. For a general
description of plant expression vectors and reporter genes, see Gruber et al.,"Vectors
for Plant Transformation"in Methods of Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology
89-119 (CRC Press, 1993).
Promoter elements employed to control expression of the enzyme encoding gene
and the selection gene, respectively, can be any plant-compatible promoter. These can
be plant gene promoters, such as, for example, the ubiquitin promoter, the promoter for
the small subunit of ribulose-1, 5-bis-phosphate carboxylase, or promoters from the
tumor-inducing plasmids from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, such as the nopaline
synthase and octopine synthase promoters, or viral promoters such as the cauliflower
mosaic virus (CaMV) 19S and 35S promoters or the figwort mosaic virus 35S
promoter. See Kay et al. (1987) Science 236: 1299 and European patent application No.
0 342 926. See international application WO 91/19806 for a review of illustrative
plant promoters suitably employed in the present invention. The range of available
plant compatible promoters includes tissue specific and inducible promoters. In one
embodiment of the present invention, the exogenous DNA is under the transcriptional
control of a plant ubiquitin promoter variant. Plant ubiquitin promoters are well
known in the art, as evidenced by European patent application no. 0 342 926.
Alternatively, a tissue specific promoter can be provided to direct transcription of
the DNA preferentially to the seed. One such promoter is the globulin-1 promoter.
This is the promoter of the maize globulin-1 gene, described by Belanger, F. C. and
Kriz, A. L. (1991) Genetics 129: 863-972. It also can be found as accession number
L22344 in the GenBank database. Another example is the phaseolin promoter. See,
Bustos et al.. (1989) The Plant Cell Vol. 1,839-853.
One option for use of a selective gene is a glufosinate-resistance encoding DNA
and in an embodiment can be the phosphinothricin acetyl transferase ("PAT") or
maize optimized PAT gene (Jayne et al, U. S. Patent no. 6,096, 947) under the control
of the CaMV 35S promoter. The gene confers resistance to bialaphos. See, Gordon-
Kamm et al. (1990); Uchimiya et al., (1993) BiolTechnology 11: 835, and Anzai et al.,
(1989) Mol. Gen. Gen. 219: 492.
It may also be desirable to provide for inclusion of sequences to direct expression
of the protein to a particular part of the cell. A variety of such sequences are known to
those skilled in the art. For example, if it is preferred that expression be directed to the
cell wall, this may be accomplished by use of a signal sequence and one such sequence
is the barley alpha-amylase signal sequence. Rogers, (1985) J. Biol Chem 260, 3731-
3738. Another example is the brazil nut protein signal sequence when used in canola
or other dicots. Another alternative is to express the enzyme in the endoplasmic
reticulum of the plant cell. This may be accomplished by use of a localization
sequence, such as KDEL. This sequence contains the binding site for a receptor in the
endoplasmic reticulum. Munro, S. and Pelham, H. R. B. (1987) Cell. 48: 899-907.
Obviously, many variations on the promoters, selectable markers and other
components of the construct are available to one skilled in the art.
In accordance with the present invention, a transgenic plant is produced that
contains a DNA molecule, comprised of elements as described above, integrated into
its genome so that the plant expresses a heterologous enzyme-encoding DNA
sequence. In order to create such a transgenic plant, the expression vectors containing
the gene can be introduced into protoplasts, into intact tissues, such as immature
embryos and meristems, into callus cultures, or into isolated cells. Preferably,
expression vectors are introduced into intact tissues. General methods of culturing
plant tissues are provided, for example, by Miki et al., (1993) "Procedures for
Introducing Foreign DNA into Plants"in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and
Biotechnology, Glick et al. (eds) pp. 67-68 (CRC Press 1993) and by Phillips et al.,
(1988) "Cell/Tissue Culture and In Vitro Manipulation"in Corn and Corn
Improvement 3d Edit. Sprague et al. (eds) pp. 345-387 (American Soc. Of Agronomy
1988). The selectable marker incorporated in the DNA molecule allows for selection
of transformants.
Methods for introducing expression vectors into plant tissue available to one
skilled in the art are varied and will depend on the plant selected. Procedures for
transforming a wide variety of plant species are well known and described throughout
the literature. See, e. g. , Miki et al., supra ; Klein et al., (1992) BiolTechnology 10: 268;
and Weisinger et al., (1988) Ann. Rev. Genet. supra : 421-477. For example, the DNA
construct may be introduced into the genomic DNA of the plant cell using techniques
such as microprojectile-mediated delivery, Klein et al., (1987) Nature 327: 70-73.;
electroporation, Fromm et al., (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 82: 5824; polyethylene
glycol (PEG) precipitation, Paszkowski et al., (1984) Embo J. 3: 2717-2722; direct
gene transfer, WO 85/01856 and EP No. 0 275 069; in vitro protoplast transformation,
U. S. Patent No. 4,684, 611; and microinjection of plant cell protoplasts or embryogenic
callus. Crossway, (1985) Mol. Gen. Genetics 202: 179-185. Co-cultivation of plant
tissue with Agrobacterium tumefaciens is another option, where the DNA constructs
are placed into a binary vector system. Ishida et al., (1996) Nature Biotechnology 14,
745-750. The virulence functions of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens host will direct
the insertion of the construct into the plant cell DNA when the bacteria infect the cell.
See, for example Horsch et al., (1984) Science 233: 496-498, and Fraley et al. (1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 80: 4803.
Standard methods for transformation of canola are described by Moloney et al.,
(1989) Plant Cell Reports 8: 238-242. Corn transformation is described by Fromm et
al. (1990) BiolTechnology 8: 833 and Gordon-Kamm et al., The Plant Cell 2 : 603.
Agrobacterium is primarily used in dicots, but certain monocots such as maize can be
transformed by Agrobacterium. U. S. Patent No. 5,550, 318. Rice transformation is
described by Hiei et al., (1994) The Plant Journal 6 (2), 271-282, Christou et al.,
(1991) Trends in Biotechnology 10: 239. Wheat can be transformed by techniques
similar to those used for transforming corn or rice. Sorghum transformation is
described by Wan et al., (1994) Plant Physiolog. 104: 37. Soybean transformation is
described in a number of publications, including U. S. Patent No. 5,015, 580.
In one preferred method, the Agrobacterium transformation methods of Ishida
supra and also described in U. S. Patent 5,591, 616, are generally followed, with
modifications that allow the inventors to recover transformants from Hill maize. The
Ishida method uses the A188 variety of maize that produces Type I callus in culture.
In one preferred embodiment the Hill maize line is used which initiates Type II
embryogenic callus in culture. While Ishida recommends selection on
phosphinothricin when using the bar or PAT gene for selection, another preferred
embodiment provides for use of bialaphos instead.
The bacterial strain used in the Ishida protocol is LBA4404 with the 40kb super
binary plasmid containing three vir loci from the hypervirulent A281 strain. The
plasmid has resistance to tetracycline. The cloning vector cointegrates with the super
binary plasmid. Since the cloning vector has an E. coli specific replication origin, it
cannot survive in Agrobacterium without cointegrating with the super binary plasmid.
Since the LBA4404 strain is not highly virulent, and has limited application without
the super binary plasmid, the inventors have found in yet another embodiment that the
EHA101 strain is preferred. It is a disarmed helper strain derived from the
hypervirulent A281 strain. The cointegrated super binary/cloning vector from the
LBA4404 parent is isolated and electroporated into EHA 101, selecting for
spectinomycin resistance. The plasmid is isolated to assure that the EHA101 contains
the plasmid.
Further, the Ishida protocol as described provides for growing fresh culture of the
Agrobacterium on plates, scraping the bacteria from the plates, and resuspending in the
co-culture medium as stated in the'616 patent for incubation with the maize embryos.
This medium includes 4.3g MS salts, 0.5 mg nicotinic acid, 0.5 mg pyridoxine
hydrochloride, 1.0 ml thiamine hydrochloride, casamino acids, 1.5 mg 2,4-
Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D), 68. 5g sucrose and 36g glucose, all at a pH of
5.8. In a further preferred method, the bacteria are grown overnight in a Iml culture,
then a fresh 10 ml culture re-inoculated the next day when transformation is to occur.
The bacteria grow into log phase, and are harvested at a density of no more than
OD600 = 0.6 and preferably between 0.2 and 0.5. The bacteria are then centrifuged to
remove the media and resuspended in the co-culture medium. Medium preferred for
Hill is used. This medium is described in considerable detail by Armstrong, C. I. and
Green C. E. "Establishment and maintenance of friable, embryogenic maize callus and
involvement of L-proline"Planta (1985) 154: 207-214. The resuspension medium is
the same as that described above. All further Hill media are as described in Armstrong
et al. The result is redifferentiation of the plant cells and regeneration into a plant.
Redifferentiation is sometimes referred to as dedifferentiation, but the former term
more accurately describes the process where the cell begins with a form and identity, is
placed on a medium in which it loses that identity, and becomes"reprogrammed"to
have a new identity. Thus the scutellum cells become embryogenic callus.
The levels of expression of the gene of interest can be enhanced by the stable
maintenance of a protein encoding gene on a chromosome of the transgenic plant. Use
of linked genes, with herbicide resistance in physical proximity to the enzyme
encoding gene, would allow for maintaining selective pressure on the transgenic plant
population and for those plants where the genes of interest are not lost.
With transgenic plants according to the present invention, protein can be produced
in commercial quantities. Thus, the selection and propagation techniques described
above yield a plurality of transgenic plants which are harvested in a conventional
manner. The plant with the protein can be used in the processing, or the protein
extracted. Protein extraction from biomass can be accomplished by known methods
which are discussed, for example, by Heney and Orr, (1981) Anal. Biochem. 114: 92-
96.
It is evident to one skilled in the art that there can be loss of material in any
extraction method used. Thus, a minimum level of expression is required for the
process to be economically feasible. For the relatively small number of transgenic
plants that show higher levels of expression, a genetic map can be generated, via
conventional RFLP and PCR analysis, which identifies the approximate chromosomal
location of the integrated DNA molecule. For exemplary methodologies in this regard,
see Glick and Thompson (1993), in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and
Biotechnology 269-84 (CRC Press 1993). Genetic mapping can be effected, first to
identify DNA fragments which contain the integrated DNA and then to locate the
integration site more precisely. This further analysis would consist primarily of DNA
hybridizations, subcloning and sequencing. The information thus obtained would
allow for the cloning of a corresponding DNA fragment from a plant not engineered
with a heterologous enzyme encoding gene. (Here, "corresponding"refers to a DNA
fragment that hybridizes under stringent conditions to the fragment containing the
enzyme encoding gene).
One of skill will recognize that after the expression cassette is stably incorporated
in transgenic plants and confirmed to be operable, it can be introduced into other plants
by sexual crossing. Standard breeding techniques can be used, depending upon the
species to be crossed.
Commercial production of HIV-related proteins in plants is thus made possible by
the invention. By commercial production is meant the expression of the proteins in
plants such that use of the plant host system is practical and economically feasible. By
expressing the proteins at levels of at least about 0.05% total soluble protein of plant
tissue, adequate amounts of protein are produced in the plants to make commercial
production practical.
In one embodiment of the invention, a biomass is created by producing a plurality
of plants by the methods described above, where at least some of the plants express the
HIV-related proteins. The biomass created is then harvested. The plants may be used
as the source of the proteins, with all or part of the plant used as the protein source. In
a preferred embodiment of the invention, seed is used as the source of the proteins.
This is particularly preferred when a promoter preferentially expressing the proteins to
the seed is used. Alternatively, the protein may be extracted by wet milling, dry
milling or any one of numerous procedures available.
Example 1: Expression of SIV Envelope Surface Proteins in Plants
Stable expression of SIV mac239 gpl30 protein in maize seed is shown in the data
below. Expression levels were as high as 0.5% of total soluble protein. At such levels
of expression, elicitation of an immune response is expected when the material is fed
to animals as part of a normal feeding regime (Jilka, J. Immunogenicity of TGEV
spike protein expressed in transgenic maize seed: preliminary swine trials. WO
01/51080). The plant tissue can also be used to extract large amounts of this protein for
use as a reagent.
Materials and Methods
The SIV nucleotide sequence used in this example is set forth in Figure 1 (SEQ ID
NO: 1), having been synthesized for codon optimization in maize. The sequence ends
in three stop codons (the start codon and BAASS-encoding sequence not included
here). The correct mature cleaved SIVmac239 gpl30 encoded is shown in Figure 2
(SEQ ID NO: 2).
Immature embryos of corn (Zea mays L. ) were isolated from greenhouse-grown
ears at 9-13 days after pollination depending on embryo size, generally 1.5-2. 0mm
long. The embryos were treated with A. tumefaciens containing the SIV mac239
gpl30 gene with either a maize Ubil promoter with no heat shock elements (PGNpr4)
see Figure 3 (SEQ ID NO: 3; also PCT/US01/18689) or a maize globulin promoter
(Kriz, supra). Both constructs contained a barley a-amylase signal sequence
(BAASS; Rogers et al. 1985 J. Biol Chem 260,3731-3738), for targeting the protein
into the cell wall (Streatfield, S. J. , J. M. Jilka, E. E. Hood, D. D. Turner, M. R. Bailey,
J. M. Mayor, S. L. Woodard, K. K. Beifuss, M. E. Horn, D. E. Delaney, I. R. Tizard, J. A.
Howard. Plant-based vaccines: unique advantages. Vaccine 19: 2742-2748), and both
plant transcription units (PTUs) were terminated by the pinII terminator. (An et al.,
Plant Cell 1: 115-122 (January 1989). Both constructs were attached to the 5'end of a
CAMV 35S-pat-35S PTU encoding resistance to the selective agent bialaphos. The
maize vector constructed with PGNpr4 is designated PGN9065. The second SIV
maize vector (PGN9066), designated for seed preferred expression was constructed
using a fragment containing the maize globulin 1 promoter (Belanger et al, supra ;
GenBank accession L22344) in a three-way ligation with a fragment containing
BAASS: SIVmac239 gpl30 open reading frame plus the pinll terminator and the
PGN8916 backbone which contains Ti plasmid and 35S: PAT: 35S sequences (Hiei et
al. , supra).
The treated embryos were plated onto callus induction medium and incubated in
the dark at 19°C for four days. The embryos were then transferred to callus
maintenance medium (CMM) and cultured in the dark at 28°C. They were transferred
every two weeks to fresh CMM medium. The callused embryos ceased growing after
about 2 weeks on bialaphos and eventually turned brown. Transgenic calli appeared as
early as five weeks following treatment but the majority of events appeared at seven to
nine weeks after treatment. The transgenic calli were easily spotted due to their white
to pale yellow color, Type II callus phenotype, and rapid growth rate.
The transgenic events were grown for approximately four more weeks on
bialaphos selection and then plated onto regeneration medium in the dark at 28°C for
somatic embryo production. The somatic embryos were removed after three weeks
and plated onto germination medium in the light (20-30 umoles sec''m') at 25
embryos per plate at 28°C. The embryos germinated after 7-21 days and the To
plantlets were moved into 25mm x 150 mm tubes containing 40 ml of minimal
medium and left in the light as above for at least one week for further shoot and root
development.
The plants were transferred into flats filled with equal parts of SunGro High
Porosity (SunGro Horticulture Inc. ) and Metro Mix 700 (Scott's-Sierra Horticultural<BR>
Products Co. ), covered with humidomes and placed in growth chambers for three to
four weeks at 28° C and 90umoles sec''m'. Humidomes were removed after one
week. Plants were transplanted into 2gal pots filled with High Porosity potting media
and 27g of Sierra 17-6-12 slow release fertilizer mixed into the top media surface.
Plants were moved to the greenhouse floor (27° C and 195moles'sec 'rri 2). The To
plants were pollinated with pollen from greenhouse-grown maize plants of elite
germplasm.
Extraction of corn seed: Individual seeds were pulverized and homogenized with
PBST (phosphate-buffered saline with 0.05% Tween-20w). Cell debris was removed
by centrifugation. Total protein concentration was determined by the microtiter
method (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) according to the method of Bradford (Bradford,
M. M. 1976. A rapid and sesitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities
of protein utilizing the principal of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72: 248-254).
ELISA: Affinity-purified sheep anti SIV gpl30 (cat # 6239) was obtained from
Cliniqa, Inc. (Fallbrook, CA). Recombinant soluble human CD4 (cat #9759) was
obtained from Protein Sciences Corp. (Meriden, CT). The following reagents were
obtained through the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Program, Division of AIDS,
NIAID, NIH: Recombinant SIVmac239 gpl30 (cat. # 2322) from the DAIDS, NIAID
<BR>
<BR>
(Hill, C. M. , Deng, H. , Unutmaz, D. , Kewalramani, V. N. , Bastiani, L., Gorny, M. K.,<BR>
Zolla-Pazner, S. , Littman, D. R. 1997. Envelope glycoproteins from human
immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 and simian immunodeficiency virus can use
human CCR5 as a coreceptor for viral entry and make direct CD4-dependent
interactions with this chemokine receptor. J. Virol 71: 6296-6304); Rabbit anti-CD4
<BR>
<BR>
(T4-4, cat. # 806) from Dr. Raymond K. Sweet (Willey, R. L. , Maldarelli, F. , Martin,<BR>
M. A. , Strebel, K. , 1992. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpu protein induces
rapid degradation of CD4. J. Virol 66 : 7193-7200). This method is a modification of
the ELISA for gpl20-sCD4 described in the paper by J. P. Moore (Moore, J. P. 1990.
Simple methods for monitoring HIV-1 and HIV-2 gpl20 binding to soluble CD4 by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: HIV-2 has a 25-fold lower affinity than HIV-1
for soluble CD4. AIDS 4: 297-305).
Dilutions of SIVmac239 gpl30 standard (final concentration in assay 0.0034-0. 067
ng/ul) were incubated with 0.5 llg/ml CD4 in a buffer consisting of 0.2% Carnation
Follow-up formula in PBST and 0.05 gg/gl non-transformed corn extract in
polypropylene microtiter plates at 28°C with constant shaking at 250 RPM for 1 h.
Similarly, sample corn extracts were diluted to a final concentration of 0.05 llg/pl in
0.2% Carnation Follow-up formula in PBST and incubated with 0.5 gg/ml CD4.
After pre-incubation, the samples and standards were transferred to Nunc Maxisorp
plates (VWR, West Chester, PA) pre-adsorbed overnight with anti-SIV gpl30 sheep
antibody and incubated at 37°C. Complexes of gpl30-CD4 bound to the plate were
detected using anti-CD4 rabbit polyclonal antiserum and anti-rabbit alkaline
phosphatase conjugate (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA) followed by
detection of colored product formation upon incubation with p-nitrophenyl phosphate
(Sigma, St. Louis, MO).
Western analysis: Samples and standards were separated by SDS-PAGE under
reducing and denaturing conditions using Novex 4-20% acrylamide gels (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA). Gels were subsequently blotted to Immobilon P PVDF (Millipore,
Bedford, MA) and blocked with 5% non-fat dried milk in TBST (Tris-buffered saline
with 0.05% Tween-20w). Blots were incubated with affinity purified sheep anti-SIV
gpl30 and detected with anti-sheep peroxidase (Jackson Immunoresearch, West
Grove, PA) and the ECL substrate system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech,
Piscataway, NJ).
Expression of SIV Surface Proteins
Eleven stable transgenic maize events were recovered from the PGN9065 material
(SVA) and 80 T, ears were harvested from 10 of these events. Sixteen stable events
were recovered from the PGN9066 material (SVB). Thirteen of these events resulted
in 127 ears of T1 seed. These events resulted from a cross of the To plants with SP122,
a Stiff-Stalk-type elite germplasm. Crossing the Hi-II events with elite germplasm, in
particular Stiff Stalk germplasm can increase event recovery. (See USSN 10/349,392,
to be published; Horn, Michael E.; Harkey, Robin L.; Vinas, Amanda K.; Drees, Carol
F. ; Barker, Donna K.; and Lane, Jeffrey R. ,"Use of Hill-Elite Hybrids in
Agrobacterium-based Transformation of Maize"In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. (In
<BR>
<BR>
press) ). Stiff Stalk inbreds have been available since at least about the 1950s and are<BR>
derived from the Iowa Stiff Stalk synthetic population. Sprague, G. F. "Early testing of
inbred lines of maize"J. Amer. Soc. Agron. (1946) 38 : 108-117; for examples see PI
accession no. 550481 and discussion of Stiff Stalk germplasm at U. S. Patents Nos.
<BR>
<BR>
<P>5,706, 603; 6,252, 148; 5,245, 975; 6,344, 599; 5,134, 074; and Neuhausen, S. "A survey
of Iowa Stiff Stalk parents derived inbreds and BSS (HT) C5 using RFLP analysis"
MNL (1989) 63: 110-111.
When analyzed using the indirect sandwich ELISA protocol described in the
Materials and Methods, gpl30 protein expression levels as high as 0.08% TSP for the
SVA07 seed and as high as 0.022% TSP for the SVB07 material were observed (Table
1). Table 1 shows Tl seed analysis of SVA and SVB seed. All To plants were derived
from Hill.
Table 1
Construct Event Expression Level, Number of seed
analyzed
high Tl seed % TSP
SVA 01 0 12
02 <0. 0068 12
PGNpr4: 03 0.017 30
BAASS: gp 04 0.02 12
130
05 0.0086 6
06 0.017 54
07 0.078 42
08 0 12
09 <0. 0068 12
10 0.0074 12
SVB 01 0.0068 12
02 0 6
PGNpr2: 05 <0. 0068 12
BAASS : gp 07 0.022 36
130
08 0 12
09 <0. 0068 12
10 0.011 24
12 0 12
14 <0. 0068 12
15 0 10
Western analyses of SVA and SVB callus showed novel immunospecific bands at
100-115kDa, which corresponds approximately to native glycosylated gpl30, and 58-
60kDa, which approximately agrees with the expected MW from the predicted amino
acid sequence (Fig. 4).
Western blot analyses of SVA T, seed is shown in Fig. 5. Estimating expression
levels from the standard lanes, SVA07 shows approximately 0.2-0. 3% TSP. The
underestimation of SIV gpl30 using the functional ELISA may be a result of poor
binding of SIV gpl30 protein to CD4 protein. These data show that the SIV gpl30
protein is being expressed at levels that allow for extraction and purification for
reagent purposes.
The expression level is also high enough to elicit an immune response in animals
when fed to them as part of a reasonable and normal diet. This result is expected
because of earlier studies with other viral subunit proteins (Arntzen, et al., supra ; Jilka,
J. Immunogenicity of TGEV spike protein expressed in transgenic maize seed:
preliminary swine trials. WO 01/51080). Feeding corn-derived E. coli heat-labile
enterotoxin subunit B (LT-B) to mice induced a strong mucosal and systemic immune
response (Streatfield et al., supra). In fact, the LT-B delivered in corn induced a
greater anti-LT-B specific mucosal IgA response than pure LT-B (Streatfield, et al,
supra). This has also demonstrated this with a TGEV protein orally fed to swine (Jilka,
et al supra).
The results clearly demonstrate that an SIV surface protein, mac239 gpl30, can be
expressed in transgenic corn seed. Moreover, protein expression is at levels that are
adequate to be used either to induce an immune response when fed, or as a reagent
when extracted and purified.
It is believed that the difference in size between control gpl30 (from whole virus)
and corn-derived gpl30 is a result of differences in glycosylation patterns between
transgenic proteins expressed in animal cells and in plant cells. Plant cells are known
to glycosylate proteins to a greater or lesser extent than the same proteins found in
animal cells (Chargelegue, D. , N. D. Vine, C. J. van Dolleweerd, P. M. W. Drake, J. K.-C.
Ma. 2000. A murine monoclonal antibody produced in transgenic plants with plant-
specific glycans is not immunogenic in mice. Transgenic Res. 9: 187-194). This
difference is chiefly due to the inability of plants to manufacture sialic acid. However,
the difference in glycosylation pattern does not appear to alter the protein's
immunogenic properties.
Example 2: Expression of HIV Envelope Glycoprotreins in Plants
The SIV surface protein gpl30 has been successfully expressed in plants at high
levels. The same procedures set forth above were used to introduce the HIV
equivalent into plants.
A synthetic version of an HIV gpl20 segment of the env gene (GenBank accession U63632)
was constructed in which codons were changed to reflect optimal codon usage in corn and to
eliminate any potential message destabilizing sequences, see Figure 6 (SEQ ID NO: 4). The
amino acid sequence is shown in Figure 7 (SEQ ID NO: 5). In addition, directly 5', and in-frame
with the HIV sequence, the construct contained an initiator methionine followed by a maize codon
optimized barley alpha-amylase signal sequence (BAASS, GenBank accession K02637, Rogers,
1985 supra). To create a maize expression vector to direct constitutive expression, a three-way
ligation was performed using a DNA fragment containing a ubiquitin promoter variant (PGNpr4),
a fragment containing the HIV gp 120 open reading frame, and the backbone of PGN8916, which
contains the PinII terminator, beginning with a Pac I restriction site, along with Ti and
35S: PAT: 35S sequences (Hiei et. al. , 1994, supra). Sequence analysis confirmed that no errors
were introduced.
A synthetic version of an HIV gpl40 segment of the env gene, designated
gpl40unc, (GenBank accession U63632) was assembled in which codons were
changed to reflect optimal codon usage in corn, see Figure 8 (SEQ ID NO: 6). The
amino acid sequence is shown in Figure 9 (SEQ ID NO: 7). This construct was built
using a maize codon optimized synthetic gp 120 construct (described above) in a
ligation reaction with sequence shared with that of gpl40 to utilize a restriction site for
in-frame addition to the 3'end of gpl20 through to the C-terminus of gpl40. The
synthetic HIV sequence had also included sequence encoding an L/R hexamer to
replace a putative furin cleavage site at amino acids 464 through 475 (amino acid
number as in SEQ ID NO: 7), which may block cleavage in vivo, hence the designation
gpl40unc. In addition, directly 5', and in-frame with the HIV sequence, the synthetic
construct contained an initiator methionine followed by a maize codon optimized
barley alpha-amylase signal sequence (BAASS, GenBank accession K02637, Rogers,
1985 supra). To create a maize expression vector to direct constitutive expression, a
three-way ligation was performed using a DNA fragment containing a ubiquitin
promoter variant (PGNpr4), a fragment containing the HIV gpl40unc open reading
frame, and the backbone of PGN8916, which contains the PinII terminator, beginning
with a Pad restriction site, along with Ti and 35S: PAT: 35S sequences. The final
construct was sequenced, which confirmed that no errors were introduced during
cloning.
Anti-HIV Western analysis: Samples and standards were separated by SDS-PAGE
under reducing and denaturing conditions using Novex 4-20% acrylamide gels
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Gels were subsequently blotted to Immobilon P PVDF
(Millipore, Bedford, MA) and blocked with 5% non-fat dried milk in TBST (Tris-
buffered saline with 0.05% Tween-20w). Blots were incubated with affinity purified
sheep anti-HIV-1 FLgpl20 antibody (clinica, #6205) and detected with anti-sheep
peroxidase conjugate (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA) and the
ECL+plusT" substrate system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ).
Expression of HIV Surface Proteins
A single stable transgenic maize event from maize tissue transformed with HVA
was harvested and extracted with PBST containing Complete protease inhibitor tabs
(Roche, #1836153), and then extracted a second time with lx SDS gel loading buffer
without reducing agent. Figure 10 shows an immunoblot analysis of HVA callus using
an anti-HIV-1 FLgpl20 antibody. Western analyses of extracts prepared from HIV
callus showed a novel immunospecific band at ~110kDa, which corresponds
approximately to native HIV-1, FLgpl20 (Fig. 10). Estimating expression from the
standard lanes indicates HIV-lJR-FLgpl20 in HVA01 is at least 0.05% of total soluble
protein.
Feeding trials using the plant produced protein material will be undertaken using
mice and simians. Both humoral and mucosal immune responses are expected.