Biotechnology

Introduction

The issues surrounding patents and biotechnological inventions can be grouped into a number of categories, which are partly inter-related. The first area of concern relates to the legal standards in respect of the scope of patent protection for inventions in the field of biotechnology. The question as to whether certain substances isolated or derived from naturally occurring living organisms are "inventions" or "discoveries" has triggered widespread discussion. In addition to the question of patentable subject matter, the appropriate application of the patentability requirements, for example, inventive-step, industrial applicability (utility) and disclosure requirements, to biological inventions has been subject to an intense debate. Since the exclusive right conferred by a patent is justified by the public disclosure of the full scope of the patented invention, defining the breadth of the claims which are supported by the disclosure of the invention is a cornerstone of the patent system.

Secondly, licensing and other issues related to the exploitation of patents are also areas of discussion. Since one of the characteristics in the field of life sciences is that it requires broad range of comprehensive research activities, down-stream innovations may be covered by a broad patent granted at an early stage of innovation. The number and breadth of patents granted to early fundamental research have raised concerns about patent thickets and royalty stacking. In particular, reach-through claims in patents, especially for research tools, were flagged as a potential impediment to further research and development. Since universities and governmental research institutions also play an important role in the area of biotechnological research, it is essential to stimulate public-private partnership, generate revenue and protect investments. Facilitating the transfer of technology from basic research to applied research and commercialization is one of the key elements for the successful research and commercialization of biotechnological inventions.

Thirdly, issues arise concerning the relationship between patents and other forms of intellectual property protection. In the field of plant biotechnology, plant varieties are, in many countries, protected by a sui generis system, such as the UPOV system. In the era of post-genome research, innovation in the area of, for example, bioinformatics, is characterized by biological information and its processing methods. Copyright protection and protection of databases, if available, are other forms of intellectual property protection which may be of relevance in this area.

Finally, the relationship with other relevant issues, such as the conservation and preservation of the environment (including the protection of biodiversity), and moral and ethical dimensions of the protection and commercialization of biotechnological inventions has been discussed in many fora. As to the former, reference is made to the issue Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing.

 

Studies and Articles

Links on these pages, including those to studies commissioned for WIPO, do not imply the agreement of WIPO, its Member States or the International Bureau with the views expressed.

Date Source Title
2009 OECD The Bioeconomy to 2030:  Designing a Policy Agenda
December 2008 EGE Ethics of Modern Developments in Agriculture Technologies, Opinion 24 [PDF]
December 2007 OECD

Tit for Tat: Agrobiotech Intellectual Property and  Corporate Social Responsibility, Martin A. Lema and Vanesa Lowenstein

February 2008 OECD OECD International Futures Project on The Bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a Policy Agenda “Intellectual Property Issues in Biotechnology: Health and Industry” Matthew Herder et al [PDF]
2007 FAO The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
November 2006 IPRsoline Exploring the Flexibilities of TRIPS to Promote Biotechnology Capacity  Building and Appropriate Technology Transfer , Graham Dutfield et al. [PDF]
October 2006 OECD Creation and Governance of Human Genetic Research Databases

April 2006

OECD

Innovation in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology
Comparing National Innovation Systems at the Sectoral Level

2006

National Research Coucil of National Academies

Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Protemic Research: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, and Public Health, Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in Genomic and Protein Research and Innovation

October 2005

Science

Intellectual Property Landscape of the Human Genome, Kyle Jensen and Fiona Murray

July 2005 European Commission Second report to the Council and European Parliament covering developments and implications of patent law in the field of biotechnology and genetic engineering (COM(2005)312)
June 2005 OECD Intellectual Property and Competition Policy in the Biotechnology Industry: OECD Policy Brief [PDF]
April 2005 NIH Best Practices for the Licensing of Genomic Inventions, Final Notice
2005 UNCTAD International Trade in GMOs and GM Products: National and Multilateral Legal Frameworks [PDF]
August, 2004 IIPI Establishing Globally-Competitive Pharmaceutical and Bio-Medical Technology Industries in Jordan - Assessment of Business Strategies and the Enabling Environment, Michael Ryan and Jillian Shanebrook
July 2004 IIPI An Intellectual Property System in Thailand for Bio-Innovation and Commercialization: A National Strategy for Business, Government and the Technology Community, Michael Ryan and Eric Garduño
March 2004 Australian Law Reform Commission Gene Patenting and Human Health, Discussion Paper 68
January 2004 OECD Patents and Innovation: Trends and Policy Challenges
October 2003 WIPO-UPOV WIPO-UPOV Symposium on Intellectual Property Rights in Plant Biotechnology
July 2003 World Business Council for Sustainable Development Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology and Health Care [PDF]
June 2003 Trilateral Offices Comparative study on Examination Practice Relating to Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and Haplotypes
January 2003 IFPRI Biotechnology and Genetic Resources Policies [PDF]
2003 Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property Research and Patenting in Biotechnology. A Survey in Switzerland, Nikolaus Thumm [PDF]
November 2002 Trilateral Offices Comparative study on protein 3-dimensional (3-D) structure related claims [PDF]
October 2002 European Commission Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council - Development and implications of patent law in the field of biotechnology and genetic engineering (COM(2002)545 final) [PDF]
October 2002 WIPO-UPOV WIPO-UPOV symposium on the Co-existence of Patents and Plant Breeders' Rights in the Promotion of Biotechnological Developments
September 2002 Commission on IPRs Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy [PDF]
July 2002 Nuffield Council of Bioethics The Ethics of Patenting DNA [PDF]
May 2002 European Group on Ethics in Science and New technologies (EGE) Opinion No. 16: Ethical aspects of patenting inventions involving human stem cells [PDF]
January 2002 UNESCO Report of the IBC on Ethics, Intellectual Property and Genomics
2002 UNCTAD Key Issues in Biotechnology [PDF]
2002 OECD Genetic Inventions, Intellectual Property Rights and Licensing Practices : Evidence and Policies
December 2001 Commonwealth of Australia Intellectual Property and Biotechnology: A Training Handbook
December 2001 WIPO The Importance of Intellectual Property Rights in the International Spread of Private Sector Agricultural Biotechnology, Carl E. Pray, Ann Courtmanche and Ramu Govindasamy [PDF]
December 2001 WIPO Application of Intellectual Property Rights in Developing Countries: Implications for Public Policy and Agricultural Research Institutes, Mywish K. Maredia [PDF]
November 2001 Trilateral Offices Comparative study on reach-through claims
2001 APEC Intellectual Property and Biotechnology: A Training Handbook
2001-2007 CBAC Various Project Reports of CBAC
December 2000 USPTO Patent Pools: A Solution to the Problem of Access in Biotechnology Patents? [PDF]
June 1998 NIH Report of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Working Group on Research Tools
  WIPO Role of IPR in Biotechnology Transfer - Corporate Views, W. Lesser [PDF]
  Trilateral Offices Comparative study on nucleic acid molecule-related inventions whose functions are inferred based on homology search
  Trilateral Offices Comparative study on patentability of DNA fragments (additional conclusion)
  Trilateral Offices Comparative study on patentability of DNA fragments
  Trilateral Offices Comparative Study on Biotechnology Patent Practices

 

Related Sites

The inclusion of a link to a site does not imply the agreement of WIPO, its Member States or the International Bureau with any of the views expressed on the site.

World Intellectual Property Organization

 

Other Intergovernmental Organizations

Non-Governmental Organizations

 

Patents

Related Links

E-Newsletters

add this