Guide to the International Registration of Marks
Part B: Chapter II
[Back to main table of contents for the Guide] [Part A] [Part B: Chapter I] [Part B: Chapter II] [Subject index]
CHAPTER II: THE INTERNATIONAL PROCEDURE
Basic Registration or Application
The Office of Origin
What Kind of International Application?
Several ApplicantsPresentation of the International Application
Language of the International Application
The Application FormItem 1: Contracting Party Whose Office Is the Office of Origin
Item 2: ApplicantName
Address
Address for Correspondence
Phone and Fax Numbers: E-mail Address
Application in the Names of More than One Applicant
Preferred Language for Correspondence
Other IndicationsItem 3: Entitlement to File
Item 4: Appointment of a Representative
Item 5: Basic Registration or Basic Application
Item 6: Priority Claimed
Item 7: The MarkSpecial Kinds of Mark
International Registration to Be in Color
Standard CharactersItem 8: Color(s) Claimed
Item 9: Miscellaneous Indications(a) Transliteration
(b) Translation
(c) Indication that the Mark Cannot Be Translated
(d) Special Type or Category of Mark
(e) Description of the Mark
(f) Verbal Elements of the Mark
(g) DisclaimerItem 10: Goods and Services for Which International Registration Is Sought
Item 11: Designated Contracting PartiesIndication of a Second Language (Where the European Community Is Designated)
Seniority Claim (Where the European Community Is Designated)
Declaration of Intention to Use the MarkItem 12: Signature by Applicant or Representative
Item 13: Certification and Signature by Office of Origin
Fee Calculation SheetFees Due
Fee Reduction for Applicants from Least Developed Countries
Payment by Debit from an Account with the International Bureau
Payment Otherwise than by Debit from an Account with the International BureauPremature Request for International Application
Irregularities in the International ApplicationIrregularities with Respect to the Classification of Goods and Services
Irregularities with Respect to the Indication of Goods and Services
Other IrregularitiesIrregularities to be Remedied by the Office of Origin
Irregularities which can be Remedied by the Office of Origin or by the Applicant
Irregularities which must be Remedied by the Applicant
Irregularities Concerning a Declaration of Intention to Use the Mark
Introduction | The International Application | The International Registration | Refusal of Protection | Subsequent Designation | Changes in The International Registration | Renewal of International Registration | Dependence and Independence | Facts in Contracting Parties Affecting International Registrations | Continuation of Effects of International Registrations in Certain Successor States]
The International Application |
Substantive Requirements |
Basic Registration or Application |
The Office of Origin |
02.01 Before filing an international application, the potential applicant must establish which Office or Offices may be the Office of origin for the international application in question. This will depend on whether the international application will be governed by the Agreement or by the Protocol or by both - which, in turn, depends on which Contracting Parties are to be designated (see paragraphs B.II.03.01 to 03.03). |
|
Rule 1(viii), (xxv) |
02.02 To the extent that an international application is governed by the Agreement, the Office of origin is defined as the Office in charge of the registration of marks in, or on behalf of, the applicant's country of origin. The applicant's country of origin is defined (Article 1(3) of the Agreement) as:
The applicant must follow this so-called ‘cascade'; he therefore does not have a free choice of Office of origin. He cannot, for example, base his international application on a registration in the country of his domicile if, in fact, he has an industrial or commercial establishment in another country which is a party to the Agreement. |
P Article 2(1)(i) |
02.03 In contrast, where the international application is governed exclusively by the Protocol, no such cascade applies. "Office of origin" is defined (Article 2(2) of the Protocol) in a way which means that the applicant may freely choose his Office of origin on the basis of establishment, domicile or nationality, it being understood that there can be only one Office of origin. Thus, in the case of the Office of a country, an international application may be filed by anyone who is a national of that country or is domiciled or has a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in that country. In the case of the Office of a Contracting Organization, an international application may be filed by anyone who is a national of a member State of that organization or who is domiciled or has a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the territory of that organization. |
| 02.04 The interpretation of "national", "domicile" and "real and effective commercial or industrial establishment" is a matter for the laws of the Contracting Parties to determine, each as far as it is concerned. This Guide can therefore only give some guidance. | |
| 02.05 "National", under the Agreement and Protocol, is intended to have the same meaning as in Article 2 of the Paris Convention. It is taken to be capable of including both natural and legal persons. The question as to whether a natural person is a national of a particular country, and the criteria (for example, place of incorporation or headquarters) for deciding whether a legal entity is regarded as a national of that country, are matters for the law of that country. Likewise it is for the law of a Contracting Party to determine what are the criteria for either a natural person or a legal entity to be regarded as domiciled in that Contracting Party. In practice, the question of the nationality or domicile of a legal entity will arise infrequently, since its entitlement to file an international application will usually be based on the existence of an establishment in the country of origin. | |
| 02.06 The expression "real and effective industrial or commercial establishment" is taken from Article 3 of the Paris Convention, to which it was added at the first conference for the revision of the Convention, which took place in Brussels in 1897 - 1900. It was felt that the original provision, which simply referred to "an establishment", was too broad and should be restricted. The intention was that, by using the French term "sérieux" ("real" in English), fraudulent or fictitious establishments would be excluded. The term "effective" makes it clear that, while the establishment must be one at which some industrial or commercial activity takes place (as distinct from a mere warehouse), it need not be the principal place of business (in the Brussels Conference, the proposal by one of the States party to the Madrid Agreement to narrow down the requirement for establishment to the principal place of business was not adopted). | |
| 02.07 It is therefore to be understood that an enterprise may have several real and effective industrial or commercial establishments in different States that are party to the Agreement or Protocol. In such a case, any of the Offices of the respective States may qualify as the Office of origin, both under the Agreement and under the Protocol. | |
| 02.08 Where the Contracting State of which an applicant is a national, or in which he is domiciled or has an establishment, is also a member State of a Contracting Organization, there is the possibility of basing an international application on either a national or a regional application or registration. |
What Kind of International Application? |
Rule 1(viii), (ix) and (x) |
(a) where the Office of origin is the Office of a country which is bound by the Agreement only, then only countries which are also party to the Agreement may be designated; the international application will be governed exclusively by the Agreement; (b) where the Office of origin is the Office of a country which is bound by the Protocol only or, is the Office of a Contracting Organization bound by the Protocol, then only countries or organizations which are also party to the Protocol may be designated; the international application will be governed exclusively by the Protocol; (c) where the Office of origin is the Office of a country which is bound by both the Agreement and the Protocol, then any country which is a party to either the Agreement or the Protocol (or to both), or any organization which is a party to the Protocol, may be designated; in this case: - where only countries are designated and all the designated countries are party to the Agreement but not to the Protocol, the international application will be governed exclusively by the Agreement; - where all the designated Contracting Parties are party to the Protocol, irrespective of whether or not they are also party to the Agreement, the application will be governed exclusively by the Protocol; - where the international application designates at least one country party to the Agreement but not to the Protocol and at least one Contracting Party which is a party to the Protocol, whether or not that Contracting Party is also party to the Agreement, the application will be governed by both the Agreement and the Protocol. |
03.02 It is important for an applicant to know into which of these categories his application falls, since this determines such matters as the form to be used and the fees which are payable. Moreover, where the international application will be governed exclusively by the Agreement or by both the Agreement and the Protocol it must be based on a registration (as distinct from an application) with the Office of origin. |
|
|
(a) The international application is governed exclusively by the Agreement if: - the Office of origin is the Office of a State bound only by the Agreement, or - the Office of origin is the Office of a State bound by both the Agreement and the Protocol, where only countries are designated and all the designated countries are bound by the Agreement but not by the Protocol. The international application must be based on a registration in the Office of origin. (b) The international application is governed exclusively by the Protocol if: - the Office of origin is the Office of a Contracting Party bound only by the Protocol, or - the Office of origin is the Office of a Contracting Party bound by both the Agreement and the Protocol, and all the designated Contracting Parties are party to the Protocol irrespective of whether or not they are also party to the Agreement. The international application may be based on either an application or a registration in the Office of origin. (c) The international application is governed by both the Agreement and the Protocol if the Office of origin is the Office of a Contracting Party bound by both the Agreement and the Protocol, and the applicant has designated at least one State bound by the Agreement but not by the Protocol and at least one State bound by the Protocol (whether or not that State is also bound by the Agreement) or one intergovernmental organization bound by the Protocol. The international application must be based on a registration in the Office of origin. |
Several Applicants |
Rule 8 |
04.01 Two or more parties (whether natural persons or legal entities) may jointly file an international application, provided that the basic application or registration is also jointly owned by them, and that - where the international application will be governed exclusively by the Agreement, or by both the Agreement and the Protocol, the country of origin (as defined in paragraph B.II.02.02) is the same for each of the applicants; - where the international application will be governed exclusively by the Protocol, each of the applicants has the necessary connection through establishment, domicile or nationality with the Contracting Party whose Office is the Office of origin. |
| 04.02 It is not necessary for the nature of the connection (nationality, domicile or establishment) to be the same for each applicant, but all must be entitled to file an international application with the Office of the same Contracting Party. |
Presentation of the International Application |
A Article 1(2) |
05.01 The international application must be filed through the Office of origin. The first contact that an Office will have with an international application, therefore, is when a request is made to it to present an international application to the International Bureau. It is possible that an Office which receives a request to present an international application governed by both the Agreement and the Protocol will not be the correct Office of origin under the Agreement, but would be the correct Office of origin under the more liberal rule in the Protocol. In such a case, the Office should inform the applicant that the application cannot be forwarded as it stands, but that it could proceed as an application governed exclusively by the Protocol if all designations of States party to the Agreement but not to the Protocol were cancelled. |
| Rule 11(7) | 05.02 An international application which, instead of being presented through an Office, is presented by the applicant directly to the International Bureau will not be considered to be an international application. It will be returned to the sender without being examined in any way and any fees paid will be reimbursed to the party having paid them. |
| 05.03 In such case, the International Bureau is not obliged to acknowledge receipt of an international application except where transmitted by fax or by electronic communication (see paragraphs B.I.02.07 and 03.04). |
Language of the International Application |
The Application Form |
Rule 9(2)(a) |
07.01 An international application must be presented to the International Bureau on the official form. |
| 07.02 Whether the applicant can or must complete the official international application form or whether the form is completed by the Office of origin on the basis of information supplied by the applicant depends on the practice of the Office concerned. The Offices of some Contracting Parties provide forms for requesting the presentation of an international application, which are different from the official international application form and which applicants may be permitted or required to use, as prescribed by the law of the Contracting Party. Where the language(s) allowed before the Office of origin is not English, French or Spanish, the Office may require the applicant to provide the necessary information (in particular, the list of goods and services) in the language of the international application (English, French or Spanish), or it may itself translate the information into that language. | |
| A.I. Section 2 | 07.03 There are three different official forms (MM1, MM2 and MM3 respectively) for presenting an international application, depending on whether the application is governed exclusively by the Agreement, exclusively by the Protocol, or by both the Agreement and the Protocol. The official forms are available on WIPO's website under the heading Trademarks / Madrid System / Forms. |
| A.I. Section 2 | 07.04 The Office of origin must ensure that the correct form is used. Where the Office is the Office of a Contracting Party bound only by the Agreement, or only by the Protocol, only one of these forms will ever be used for applications presented by that Office. Where, however, the Office is bound by both the Agreement and the Protocol, the correct form is determined by which Contracting Parties have been designated (see earlier "What Kind of International Application", paragraphs B.II.03.01 to 03.03). |
| 07.05 The general remarks concerning official forms (see paragraphs B.I.04.01 to 04.04) should be studied. In particular, the form must be completed legibly, with the use of a typewriter or other machine; handwritten forms are not acceptable by the International Bureau. Where, instead of using forms produced by the International Bureau, applicants produce their own form, the guidance set out in paragraph B.I.04.03 must be followed. |
Item 1: Contracting Party Whose Office Is the Office of Origin |
Item 2: Applicant |
Item 3: Entitlement to File |
Rule 9(5)(a) |
10.01 Where the international application is governed (in whole or in part) by the Agreement (and is therefore filed on form MM1 or MM3), the applicant should check only one of the boxes (i), (ii) and (iii) under item 3(a), in that order of priority. That is: - where the applicant has a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the country through whose Office the international application is presented, box (i) must be checked; - if the applicant has no establishment in a country party to the Agreement, but is domiciled in the country through whose Office the international application is presented, box (ii) must be checked; - if the applicant has neither an establishment nor a domicile in any country party to the Agreement but is a national of the country through whose Office the international application is presented, box (iii) must be checked. |
| Rule 9(5)(b) | 10.02 Where the international application is governed exclusively by the Protocol (filed on form MM2), the application should give one of the following indications concerning the applicant's connection with the Contracting Party through whose Office the international application is being presented, using the appropriate box or space in item 3(a): - (where the Contracting Party is a State) that the applicant is a national of that State; - (where the Contracting Party is an organization) the name of the member State of that organization of which the applicant is a national; - that the applicant is domiciled in that Contracting Party; - that the applicant has a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in that Contracting Party. Only one of these indications need be given, though more may be given if the applicant so wishes. |
10.03 The Office through which the international application is presented may ask for evidence where it has reasonable grounds to doubt the veracity of the indications given. In general, it may be presumed that the address given in item 2(b) is the address of the applicant's establishment or domicile. Even if this address is in the territory of the Contracting Party through whose Office the international application is presented, it is still necessary to check at least one box under item 3(a); if this is not done, it is not possible to determine the nature of the applicant's entitlement to file. |
|
| Rule 9(5)(c) | 10.04 In general, it is sufficient to provide the information described in paragraphs B.II.10.01 and 10.02 (by naming a State or checking a box). Where however the applicant indicates, by checking the appropriate box(es) in item 3(a), that he has an establishment or domicile in the territory of the Contracting Party through whose Office the international application is presented, but his address (as given in item 2(b)) is not in that territory, the applicant must in addition indicate, in item 3(b), the address of his establishment or domicile in that territory. |
| 10.05 As indicated in paragraph B.II.04.01, where the international application is jointly filed by two or more applicants, the requirements as to entitlement to file the international application must be satisfied in respect of each applicant. Where appropriate therefore, information concerning the entitlement of each applicant must be given; unless a self-generated form is used, this information should be given in a continuation sheet. |
Item 4: Appointment of a Representative |
Rule 9(4)(a)(iii) |
11.01 If the applicant wishes to be represented before the International Bureau, the name and address of the representative should be given in this part of the form. The information should be sufficient to enable correspondence to be sent to the representative, and should preferably include telephone and telefacsimile numbers and any e-mail address. (See also paragraphs B.I.09.01 to 11.02). |
| 11.02 Where the name of the representative is in characters other than Latin characters, the name must be indicated as a transliteration into Latin characters, following the phonetics of the language of the international application. Where the representative is a legal entity, the transliteration may be replaced by a translation into the language of the international application. | |
11.03 Giving the name and address of the representative in the international application is all that is necessary to effect his appointment; no power of attorney or other separate document should be sent to the International Bureau. |
|
| Rule 3(3)(a) | 11.04 With respect to who may be appointed as representative, the Madrid system does not provide for any requirement as to professional qualification, nationality, residence or domicile. As long as the more general requirements concerning the appointment of the representative are not complied with, the International Bureau sends all communications to the applicant. |
| 11.05 The appointment of a representative in the international application only empowers him to act before the International Bureau. It may subsequently become necessary to appoint one or more further representatives to act before the Offices of designated Contracting Parties, for example, in the event of a refusal of protection issued by such an Office. The appointment of a representative in such a case will be governed by the requirements of the Contracting Party concerned. |
Item 5: Basic Registration or Basic Application |
Item 6: Priority Claimed |
Article 4(2) |
13.01 Priority of an earlier filing may be claimed under Article 4 of the Paris Convention. That earlier filing will normally be the basic application or the application which resulted in the basic registration. However it may also be: - another application made either in a country party to the Paris Convention or in a Member of the World Trade Organization (WTO) even if the latter is not a party to the Paris Convention1; or - an application which, under a bilateral or multilateral treaty concluded between countries of the Paris Union, is equivalent to a regular national filing2. |
Rule 9(4)(a)(iv) |
13.02 Where priority is claimed, there must be indicated the name of the national or regional Office with which the earlier filing was made, together with the date of filing and (where available) the number of the application. No copy of the earlier filing is needed. |
| 13.03 Where priority is claimed from more than one earlier filing, and all relevant indications do not fit in the space provided, then (unless a self-generated form is used) the one(s) with the earliest date are to be given in item 6, with the remaining ones indicated in a continuation sheet. | |
| 13.04 Where the earlier filing does not relate to all of the goods and services listed in item 10 of the international application form, there should be indicated in item 6 the goods and services to which the earlier filing relates. Where several earlier filings with different dates are indicated, the goods and services to which each relates should be indicated. | |
| Rule 14(2)(i) | 13.05 The International Bureau will disregard any claimed priority date which is more than six months earlier than the date of the international registration and will so inform the applicant and Office of origin. Such a date will therefore not be recorded in the International Register. However, in accordance with Article 4(c)(3) of the Paris Convention, where the last day of the six-month period from the claimed priority date is a day when the Office of origin is not open for the receipt of requests to present international applications, the six-month period will, where the international registration bears the date of the receipt by the Office of origin of the said request, be extended until the first following working day at the Office of origin; similarly, where the international registration bears the date of the receipt of the international application by the International Bureau, or a subsequent date, and the last day of the six-month period is a day when the International Bureau is not open to the public, the six-month period will be extended until the first following working day at the International Bureau. (For the date of the international registration, see paragraphs B.II.28.01 to 28.06). |
| Rule 14(2)(i) | 13.06 As described in paragraphs B.II.28.03 to 28.06, deficiencies or delays may cause the international registration to have a date which is later than the date on which the international application was received by the Office of origin. If the result is that the date of international registration is more than six months after any priority date claimed, the claim to priority will be lost, and no data in respect of priority will be recorded by the International Bureau. |
Item 7: The Mark |
Rule 9(4)(a)(v) |
14.01 A reproduction of the mark must be provided in box (a) in item 7 of the form. Such a reproduction must consist of a two-dimensional graphic (including photographic) representation of the mark. This reproduction must be identical with the mark as it appears in the basic application or registration. In particular, where the mark in the basic registration or application is in black and white, so must the reproduction in this box; likewise where the basic mark is in color, the reproduction in this box must also be in color. |
| 14.02 The boxes in this item of the application form measure 8cm x 8cm, which is the standard size for publication of a mark in the WIPO Gazette of International Marks. Where a self-generated form is used, the reproduction of the mark must nonetheless be of a size that would fit in the box, that is, it must not exceed 8 cm x 8 cm. Moreover where, in accordance with paragraph B.II.14.07, two reproductions of the mark are provided, both reproductions must be on the same page. | |
| 14.03 The reproduction(s) of the mark must be sufficiently clear for the purposes of recording, publication and notification. If this is not the case, the International Bureau will treat the international application as irregular. | |
14.04 The reproduction(s) of the mark may be typed, printed, pasted or reproduced by any other means, at the option of the applicant and subject to what may be prescribed by the Office of origin. Since the image used for publication is produced by scanning the application form, the mark will be published in the Gazette exactly as it appears on the form. For example, if it is simply typed on the form, that is what will appear in the Gazette. |
|
A.I. Section 9(a) A.I. Section 9(b) |
14.05 Where the application is communicated by fax, the original of that page of the official form which bears the reproduction of the mark must also be sent to the International Bureau. Only this page should be sent; the whole application must not be sent, since it may be mistaken for a new application. There must be included on the page sufficient indications (the number of the basic application or basic registration or the Office reference number contained in the international application) to enable the international application to be identified; the Office must also sign the page. The International Bureau will, in its confirmation of receipt of the telefacsimile communication, remind the Office that sent it of the need to send the original of the page bearing the mark. The International Bureau will not examine the application until the original has been received or until a period of one month has elapsed since the telefacsimile was received, whichever is the earlier. This is because it is only when a clear reproduction of the mark is received that the International Bureau may be able to identify certain irregularities. The Office of origin should therefore ensure that the original is sent without delay (preferably on the same day as the telefacsimile is sent), in order to avoid these adverse consequences for the applicant. |
Special Kinds of Mark |
|
| 14.06 Where the mark is of an unusual kind (for example, a three-dimensional mark or a sound mark), then the reproduction in box (a) should correspond exactly with the graphical representation of the mark which appears in the basic application or registration. If the representation in the basic application or registration consists of, for example, a perspective view of a three-dimensional mark, or a representation in conventional musical notation or a description in words of a sound mark, then this is what should appear in box (a) under item 7. Any description which is supplementary to this graphic representation of the mark should be given under item 9 (see paragraph B.II.15.06). Non-graphical representations of such marks (such as samples of three-dimensional marks, or recordings of sound marks) must not be included. | |
International Registration to Be in Color |
|
Article 3(3) |
14.07 Where the applicant claims color as a distinctive feature of the mark but the reproduction of the mark in the basic registration or basic application was in black and white (for example, because the Office of origin did not provide for registration or publication in color), a reproduction of the mark in color must be provided in box (b), in addition to the black and white reproduction to be provided in box (a). Otherwise box (b) should be left empty. |
Standard Characters |
|
| Rule 9(4)(a)(vi) | 14.08 Where the applicant wishes that the mark be considered as a mark in standard characters, box (c) should be checked. A mark in standard characters is equivalent in some countries to what is known as a "word mark", as opposed to a "figurative" mark. This declaration does not legally bind the Office or courts of a designated Contracting Party, which are free to determine what effect (if any) such a declaration has in their territory. In particular, they may consider that the mark is not in standard characters if it contains elements such as accents which are not standard in the language(s) used in that Contracting Party. |
| 14.09 This box should not be checked where the mark contains special characters or figurative elements. Although the International Bureau will not question a declaration concerning standard characters, the applicant should be aware that if the Office of a designated Contracting Party considers that the mark is not in standard characters, it may issue a refusal, for example, on the ground that the international registration covers two marks (one in standard characters and one in special characters) or that it is simply not clear for what protection is sought. | |
| Rule 9(4)(a)(viibis) | 14.10 Where the mark that is the subject of the basic registration or basic application consists of a color or a combination of colors as such, that fact should be indicated by checking the appropriate box. This is without prejudice to the fact that a designated Contracting Party may refuse protection on the ground that such marks are not recognized under its law. |
Item 8: Color(s) Claimed |
Article 3(3) Rule 9(4)(b)(iv) |
14.11 Where color has been claimed as a distinctive feature of the mark in the basic application or basic registration, such a claim should be reflected in the international application by checking the appropriate box, and the color or combination of colors must be indicated in words. Color may also be claimed in an international application despite the fact that there is not a corresponding claim in the basic application or basic registration. Where there is no such claim in the basic application or basic registration, the basic mark must be in the color or combination of colors claimed in the international application. Finally, where color is claimed, the applicant may, in addition, give an indication in words of the principal parts of the mark that are in that color, in respect of each of the colors claimed (see also paragraph B.II.19.02). |
Item 9: Miscellaneous Indications |
(a) Transliteration |
|
Rule 9(4)(a)(xii) |
15.01 Where the mark consists of or contains matter in characters other than Latin characters, or numerals other than Arabic or Roman numerals, a transliteration into Latin characters or Arabic numerals must be provided. The transliteration into Latin characters must follow the phonetics of the language of the international application. |
(b) Translation |
|
Rule 9(4)(b)(iii) Rule 6(4)(b) |
15.02 Where the mark consists of or contains words which may be translated, such a translation may be provided. The translation may be into English and/or French and/or Spanish, irrespective of the language of the international application. The provision of a translation is at the option of the applicant, and is intended to forestall requests for a translation by the Office of a designated Contracting Party. The International Bureau will not check the accuracy of any translation of the mark, nor will it question the absence of a translation or provide a translation of its own. |
(c) Indication that the Mark Cannot Be Translated |
|
| 15.03 Where the applicant believes that the word or words appearing in the mark cannot be translated (that is, they are made-up words), this may be indicated by checking the appropriate box. This is intended to forestall a request by the Offices of designated Contracting Party for translation or for confirmation that no translation is possible. | |
(d) Special Type or Category of Mark |
|
Rule 9(4)(a)(viii) to (x) |
15.04 Where the mark is a three-dimensional mark, a sound mark or a collective, certification or guarantee mark, this should be indicated by checking the appropriate box. Such an indication may be given only if it appears in the basic registration or basic application. |
| 15.05 In the case of a collective, certification or guarantee mark, regulations governing the use of the mark are not required as part of the international application, and should not be sent to the International Bureau with the international application. A designated Contracting Party may however ask for such regulations to be filed. In order to forestall a refusal by such a Contracting Party, an applicant may wish to send the required documents directly to the Office of that Contracting Party as soon as he receives the certificate of international registration. | |
(e) Description of the Mark |
|
| Rule 9(4)(a)(xi) | 15.06 Where the basic application or basic registration contains a description of the mark, the same description may, if the applicant so wishes or if the Office of origin so requires, be included in the appropriate space. Such a description may also indicate that the mark is of a kind not covered by the types or categories mentioned on the form (see paragraph B.II.15.04), such as a hologram mark, provided that such an indication is present in the basic application or registration. Where the description in the basic application or basic registration is in a language other than the language of the international application, the description in this item must be given in the language of the international application. |
| 15.07 It must be stressed that a description may be included in the international application only if that description was included in the basic registration or basic application. Moreover it must be a description of the mark and not, for example, a statement concerning the use of the mark or its reputation. | |
(f) Verbal Elements of the Mark |
|
| 15.08 The International Bureau captures (from the reproduction in item 7) what appears to it to be the essential verbal elements of the mark. This is included in the ROMARIN database and is used in notifications and correspondence in order to confirm the identity of the resulting international registration. Where however the mark is in special characters or in handwriting, there is a risk that the words or letters may be misinterpreted by the International Bureau. Moreover, where the mark contains a great deal of verbal matter (for example, where the mark consists of a label), it may not be apparent what should be captured. The applicant may therefore wish to indicate what he considers to be the essential verbal elements of the mark. Any such indication is, however, entirely for information and is not intended to have any legal effect. This indication should not be given where the box in item 7 for standard characters has been checked. | |
(g) Disclaimer |
|
| Rule 9(4)(b)(v) | 15.09 Where the applicant wishes to disclaim protection for any verbal element of the mark, the appropriate box should be checked and the element or elements for which protection is disclaimed should be indicated. The purpose of this is to forestall requests from designated Contracting Parties for such a disclaimer to be included in the International Register. If however a disclaimer is included in the international application, it must be in respect of the international registration as a whole; it cannot be made for only some of the designated Contracting Parties. |
15.10 It does not matter if there was no corresponding disclaimer in the basic registration or basic application. Conversely, if there was a disclaimer in the basic registration or basic application, this does not make it obligatory to include it in the international application. There is not any possibility for the making of a disclaimer once the mark has been registered by the International Bureau. |
|
Item 10: Goods and Services for which International Registration Is Sought |
Rule 9(4)(a)(xiii) |
16.01 There must be indicated the names of the goods and services for which the international registration of the mark is sought. These must be grouped in the appropriate classes of the International Classification of Goods and Services, each group being preceded by the number of the class, and presented in the order of the classes of that Classification. The goods and services must be indicated in precise terms, preferably using words appearing in the Alphabetical List of the International Classification. If necessary, a continuation sheet should be used and the appropriate box should be checked. |
16.02 This list of goods and services may be narrower than the list in the basic registration or application. It may not however be broader or contain different goods and services. This does not mean that exactly the same terms must be used; the terms used in the international application must however be equivalent to, or fall within the scope of, those used in the basic registration or application. |
|
| 16.03 The Office of origin must check that all the goods and services listed are covered by those appearing in the basic application or basic registration, so that it can make the declaration referred to in paragraph B.II.19.02. The Office should also check that the classification and grouping of the goods and services is correct, in order to avoid the need for the International Bureau to notify it of any irregularity in this regard (see paragraphs B.II.23.01 to 23.11). | |
| Rule 9(4)(b)(v) | 16.04 The international application may contain limitations of the list of goods and services in respect of one or more designated Contracting Parties. Such limitations should be indicated in item 10(b). The limitation may be different in respect of different Contracting Parties. A limitation with respect to a designated Contracting Party for which an individual fee is payable will be taken into account in calculating the amount of that fee. In contrast, a limitation will not affect the number of supplementary fees to be paid. Even if a limitation is made for all the designated Contracting Parties, the goods and services named in item 10(a) are nonetheless included in the international registration and may be the subject of a subsequent designation. |
| Rule 6(4)(a) | 16.05 A translation of the list of goods and services into English, French or Spanish, as the case may be, may be annexed to the international application. Although the International Bureau is not bound to accept such a translation as correct (see paragraph B.II.32.02), it may assist the Bureau in ensuring that the translation reflects the applicant's intentions, particularly where the list in the basic registration or basic application is in a language other than English, French or Spanish. |
Item 11: Designated Contracting Parties |
Rule 9(4)(a)(xv) |
17.01 Those States or organizations in which the applicant wishes the mark to be protected should be indicated by checking the appropriate boxes in item 11. Where a self-generated form is used, the names of the Contracting Parties to be designated should be written in. |
| 17.02 The name of a Contracting Party for which there is no box on the official form, because it has ratified or acceded to the Agreement or Protocol since the form was printed, may be written in, provided that the ratification or accession has entered into force. | |
| 17.03 Where a State or organization which has been designated has ratified the relevant treaty, or acceded to it, but the ratification or accession has not yet come into force, the Office of origin may cancel the designation and so inform the applicant; alternatively it may ask the applicant whether he wishes the designation to be cancelled or whether he would prefer the request to be put on one side and be deemed to have been received on the date on which the ratification or accession in question comes into force. | |
17.04 Only States or organizations which are party to the same treaty (Agreement or Protocol) as the Contracting Party whose Office is the Office of origin may be designated. Where a State or an organization which the applicant has designated - is a party to the Protocol only, while the Contracting Party whose Office is the Office of origin is a party to the Agreement only, - is a State party to the Agreement only, while the Contracting Party whose Office is the Office of origin is a party to the Protocol only, or - is not a party to either the Agreement or the Protocol, the designations will be disregarded by the International Bureau, which will so inform the applicant. |
|
Indication of a Second Language (Where the European Community Is Designated) |
|
| Rule 9(5)(g)(ii) | 17.05 Where the European Community is designated in an international application, the applicant must, in addition to the language of the application itself, indicate a second working language before the Office of that Contracting Organization. The indication of this second language must be chosen among one of the (five) official languages of OHIM, namely, English, French, German, Italian or Spanish. With regard to the designation of the European Community in a subsequent designation, refer to paragraph B.II.43.09. |
| 17.06 This second language serves exclusively as a language in which third parties may lodge opposition and cancellation proceedings before OHIM. | |
| 17.07 Where the European Community has been designated and the indication of the second language is missing or is incorrect, this does not prevent the International Bureau from proceeding to the international registration and notifying it to OHIM. In such a case, however, a provisional refusal based on this ground will be notified by OHIM and will have to be overcome by the holder directly before OHIM. | |
Seniority Claim (Where the European Community Is Designated) |
|
| Rule9(5)(g)(i) | 17.08 Under the Community Trade Mark system, the proprietor of a mark already registered in or for a member State of the European Community who applies for registration of an identical mark with OHIM for goods or services which are covered by the earlier mark, may claim the seniority of that earlier mark in respect of the Member State concerned. The effect of such seniority claim is that where the proprietor of the Community trademark surrenders the earlier mark or allows it to lapse, he shall be deemed to continue to have the same rights as he would have had if the earlier mark had continued to be registered. |
| A.I. Section 4(j) | 17.09 Applicants wishing to claim seniority in respect of a designation of the European Community under the Madrid Protocol are required to indicate the following elements in a separate official form (MM17), to be annexed to the international application form: - each Member State in or for which the earlier mark is registered, - the date from which the relevant registration was effective, - the number of the relevant registration, and - the goods and services for which the earlier mark is registered. |
| 17.10 With respect to the treatment of seniority claims by the International Bureau and to various operations which may arise in relation to such claims (such as the withdrawal, refusal or cancellation), see paragraphs B.II.88.01 to 88.04. | |
Declaration of Intention to Use the Mark |
|
| Rule 9(5)(f) | 17.11 Where a Contracting Party designated under the Protocol, is one which has notified the Director General, under Rule 7(2), that it requires a declaration of intention to use the mark on a separate form, that declaration should be annexed to the international application. Any additional requirements of that Contracting Party concerning the language or the signing of the declaration must also be complied with. In particular, a Contracting Party may require that the declaration be signed by the applicant himself. |
17.12 In the case of a Contracting Party which requires a declaration of intention to use the mark under Rule 7(2), but without requiring that it be on a separate form, no special action is needed, as the statement on the international application form indicates that by designating such a Contracting Party, the applicant declares that he has the intention that the mark will be used by him or with his consent in that Contracting Party for the goods and services covered by the international application. |
|
Item 12: Signature by Applicant or Representative |
Item 13: Certification and Signature by Office of Origin |
Rule 9(2)(b) |
19.01 The Office of origin must sign the international application and must certify the date on which it received the request to present the international application (or is deemed to have received the application (see paragraphs B.II.21.02 and 21.04)). This date is important because, in principle, it will become the date of the international registration (see paragraph B.II.28.01). The Office of origin must also certify certain facts concerning the relationship between the international application and the basic registration or basic application. |
Rule 9(5)(d)(ii) Rule 8
Rule 9(5)(d)(iv)
Rule 9(5)(d)(iii)
Rule 9(5)(d)(v)
Rule 9(5)(d)(vi) |
19.02 The declaration of the Office of origin in item 13 of the application form must certify:
|
| Rule 9(5)(e) | 19.03 Where the international application is based on two or more basic applications and/or registrations, this declaration may be made only if the statements under (a), (b), (c) and (d) in paragraph B.II.19.02 are true for each of them. As far as the statement under (e) is concerned, the Office of origin may make this declaration provided that the goods and services mentioned in the basic application(s) and/or registration(s), taken together, cover those listed in the international application. |
Rule 9(2)(b) |
19.04 The international application must be signed by the Office of origin. This signature may be handwritten, printed or stamped, or may be replaced by a seal. In the latter case, an indication in letters of the name of the natural person whose seal is used is not needed. Where the application is transmitted to the International Bureau by electronic means, the signature is replaced by a mode of identification agreed with the International Bureau. |
| 19.05 The declaration to be signed by the Office of origin and referred to in paragraph B.II.19.02 is printed on the official form. The Office of origin, by signing the form, is deemed to affirm the truth of the declaration. Where, for example, an international application contains a description or an indication which is covered by the declaration but is not present in the basic registration or basic application, or the international application includes goods and services not covered by the basic registration or application, the Office is unable to do this. It must ask the applicant to correct any discrepancy (for example, by deleting the description or indication or by restricting the list of goods and services so that it falls within the list contained in the basic registration or application). Until this has been done, the application must not be forwarded to the International Bureau. | |
| 19.06 The Office of origin should check the content of the form to the extent that this is necessary in order to avoid any irregularities for which it would be responsible (see paragraphs B.II.25.02 and 25.03). Any such examination should, however, not unduly delay the forwarding of the application to the International Bureau, as this could affect the date of the international registration (see paragraph B.II.28.02). |
Fee Calculation Sheet |
The following paragraphs should be read in conjunction with the general remarks in paragraphs B.I.08.01 to 08.12 concerning the payment of fees to the International Bureau.
Rule 9(4)(a)(xiv) |
20.01 There must be indicated, in the fee calculation sheet contained in the official form: - the authorization to debit the required amount from an account opened with the International Bureau and the identification of the party giving the instructions; or - the amount of the fees being paid, the method by which payment is being made and the identification of the party making the payment. |
Fees Due |
|
| 20.02 The fees payable in connection with the filing of an international application consist of the basic fee, one or more complementary or individual fees, depending on the Contracting Parties designated and possibly one or more supplementary fees, depending on the number of classes of goods and services covered. | |
Article 8(2) |
20.03 Article 8(2) of the Agreement and Article 8(2) of the Protocol provide that the fees payable in connection with an international application consist of: - the basic fee; - a complementary fee for each Contracting Party designated; - a supplementary fee for each class of goods and services in excess of three. |
| P Article 8(7) | 20.04 Article 8(7) of the Protocol however provides that a Contracting Party may declare that, instead of a share in the revenue produced by the supplementary and complementary fees, it wishes to receive an individual fee. Nevertheless, Article 9sexies(1)(b) renders inoperative a declaration under Article 8(7) in the mutual relations between Contracting Parties to both the Agreement and Protocol. In other words, where the designated Contracting Party having made the declaration is a party to both the Agreement and the Protocol and the Contracting Party whose Office is the Office of origin is also a party to both treaties, it follows from Article 9sexies(1)(b) (see paragraph A.04.17) that the supplementary and complementary fees, and not the individual fee, are payable. |
| Rule 34(3) | 20.05 A Contracting Party that requires an individual fee may also require that the fee comprises two parts, one part to be paid at the time of filing the international application and the second part to be paid at a later date determined in accordance with the law of the Contracting Party concerned. In practice, the second part will be payable when the Office concerned is satisfied that the mark qualifies for protection. In other words, payment of the second part of the individual fee is analogous to payment of a registration fee in the case of a national application. At the stage of filing the international application, the only practical effect of this requirement is that the amount to be paid corresponds to the first part of the individual fee. The holder will be notified by the International Bureau when the second part of the fee becomes due. |
20.06 In summary, the fees payable for an international application are: - the basic fee; - an individual fee for the designation of each designated Contracting Party that has made the relevant declaration (see paragraph B.II.20.04) and is designated under the Protocol, except where that designated Contracting Party is a State bound (also) by the Agreement and the Office of origin is the Office of a State bound (also) by the Agreement (in respect of such a designation, a complementary fee is payable); - a complementary fee for each designated Contracting Party in respect of which no individual fee is payable; - a supplementary fee for each class of goods and services in excess of three; where however all the Contracting Parties designated are ones in respect of which an individual fee is payable, no supplementary fee is required. |
|
| 20.07 The amounts of the basic, complementary and supplementary fees are set out in the Schedule of Fees. It should be noted that the amount of the basic fee depends on whether the mark is in color; where the reproduction of the mark, or one of the reproductions (see paragraph B.II.14.07), is in color, a higher fee is payable. The amounts of the current individual fees are available under the heading Trademarks / Madrid System / Fees / Fee Calculator on WIPO's website. A fee calculator that takes account of all possible permutations of designations of Contracting Parties and number of classes of goods and services (including limitations in respect of particular Contracting Parties) is also available on this site. | |
Fee Reduction for Applicants from Least Developed Countries |
|
20.08 Applicants having a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment, or a domicile in a least developed country, or being a national of a least developed country (in accordance with the list established by the United Nations), and who file their international applications through the trademark office of such country, as the Office of origin, will be required to pay only 10% of the amount of the basic fee. This is reflected in the Schedule of Fees and has been incorporated in the fee calculator on the Madrid website ( http://www.wipo.int/madrid/feecalc/ ). |
|
| 20.09 The list of least developed countries is maintained and updated on a regular basis by the United Nations and may be consulted on the United Nations website at www.un.org. The list may also be consulted on the WIPO website at http://www.wipo.int/ldcs/en/country. | |
Payment by Debit from an Account with the International Bureau |
|
| 20.10 Where payment is to be made by debit of the required amount from an account opened with the International Bureau, the box in part (a) of the fee calculation sheet should be checked; furthermore, the holder of the account, the account number and the party giving the instructions to debit should be indicated. Where this method of payment is being used, the amount to be debited need not be indicated; indeed one of the advantages of paying by this method is that it avoids the risk of an irregularity if the fees, as calculated by the applicant or the representative, are incorrect. It is nevertheless possible to give instructions to the International Bureau to debit a specified amount from an account opened with it. In that case, the details conducting to the total amount being paid should be indicated in part (b) of the fee calculation sheet, and the instruction to debit that amount from an account with WIPO should be indicated in that same part (b) of the said sheet. | |
Payment Otherwise than by Debit from an Account with the International Bureau |
|
| 20.11 The total amount being paid must be indicated in the appropriate box in part (b) of the fee calculation sheet. In addition, amounts and, preferably, the numbers of fees being paid should be indicated in the spaces provided in that part of the fee calculation sheet, in order to assist the International Bureau in identifying the error if the total is incorrect. | |
20.12 The identity of the party (applicant, representative or Office of origin) making the payment should be indicated in the appropriate space in part (b) of the fee calculation sheet. It is important to indicate who is making the payment, since it is that party that will be notified if the International Bureau finds that the payment is insufficient or that will be totally or partially reimbursed if the application is considered as abandoned, is not considered as such, or is withdrawn. |
|
| 20.13 Where the fees are not being paid through the Office of origin, the Office should draw the attention of the applicant to the fact that international registration cannot take place until the necessary fees have been received by the International Bureau. The Office is not required to check that payment has been made, though it may do so if it thinks fit, for example by asking to see a receipt issued by the International Bureau before transmitting the international application. | |
| 20.14 The method by which the fees are being paid (see paragraph B.I.08.05) should be indicated by checking the appropriate box in part (b) of the fee calculation sheet. | |
Premature Request for International Application |
21.01 Under the Agreement, an international application can be based only on a registration of the mark recorded in the register of the Office of origin. Where an Office receives a request to present an international application that will be governed (exclusively or in part) by the Agreement, before it has registered the mark on which the international application is based, the Office will treat the request as premature. It will be dealt with as follows. |
|
Rule 11(1)(a) |
21.02 Where the international application will be governed exclusively by the Agreement, there is no possibility of it proceeding in respect of any of the designated countries until the basic mark has been registered. The Office of origin will therefore put the international application aside until it has registered the basic mark. The request is then deemed to have been received on the date on which the basic mark was actually recorded in the register of the Office of origin. Under the Agreement, this is a frequent practice. Applicants in States whose Offices register applications for protection in their territory relatively quickly, or whose laws provide for an accelerated procedure where the applicant intends to file an international application on the basis of the national registration, sometimes find it convenient to send to the Office of origin, on the same day, an application for the basic registration and a request to present an international application to the International Bureau once the basic mark is registered. |
Rule 11(1)(b) Rule 11(1)(c) |
21.03 Where the international application will be governed both by the Agreement and the Protocol, the request is not premature as far as those designations that are made under the Protocol are concerned. The Office of origin is therefore required to delete those designations that would be governed by the Agreement and allow the international application to proceed as an application governed exclusively by the Protocol, unless the applicant has explicitly requested that the application be treated as one which is governed by both the Agreement and the Protocol. In the latter case, the international application can only proceed once the basic mark has been registered; it will therefore be treated as described in the above paragraph. |
| 21.04 If the designations made under the Agreement have been deleted, the date of the international registration will, for those Contracting Parties which have been designated under the Protocol, be the date on which the Office of origin received the request to present the international application (provided the international application is received by the International Bureau within two months from that date, and subject to any irregularity which may affect the date of international registration). Those countries whose designations (under the Agreement) have been deleted may be the subject of subsequent designations under Rule 24, once the basic mark has been registered; the provisions of Rule 24(6) concerning the effective date of a subsequent designation will apply. On the other hand, if the applicant has explicitly requested that the application be treated as one under the Agreement and the Protocol, so that the Office of origin will put the application on one side until the basic mark has been registered, the effective date of all designations will be the date on which the basic mark is actually recorded in the register of the Office of origin (provided that the international application is received by the International Bureau within two months from that date, and subject to any irregularity that may affect the date of international registration). | |
| 21.05 A person who wishes to file an international application in which some designations will be governed by the Agreement and some by the Protocol, but whose basic mark has not yet been registered by the Office of origin, should therefore weigh up the relative advantages and disadvantages of these two courses before filing the request for an international application with the Office of origin. | |
| 21.06 Paragraphs B.II.21.01 to 21.05 apply in any case where the international application is based on an application, even if it is also based on a registration. It cannot proceed as an international application governed (exclusively or in part) by the Agreement until the (or each) application has resulted in a registration. Alternatively, the applicant could decide to delete the reference to the application and the goods and services to which it relates. | |
| 21.07 These problems cannot arise where the international application is governed exclusively by the Protocol. |
Irregularities in the International Application |
Irregularities with Respect to the Classification of Goods and Services |
Irregularities with Respect to the Indication of Goods and Services |
Rule 13(1) |
24.01 If the International Bureau considers that a term used in the list of goods and services is too vague for the purposes of classification, is incomprehensible, or is linguistically incorrect, it will notify the Office of origin and inform the applicant at the same time. It may suggest either a substitute term or the deletion of the term. |
| Rule 13(2)(a) | 24.02 The Office of origin may, within three months of the notification, make a proposal for remedying the irregularity. The applicant may communicate his views to the Office, or the Office may seek the views of the applicant. If this proposal by the Office is acceptable, or if the Office agrees to accept any suggestion which the International Bureau may have made, the International Bureau will change the term accordingly. If the proposal made by the Office is acceptable but irregular with respect to the classification of goods and services, the procedure described above applies (see paragraphs B.II.23.01 to 23.11). |
| Rule 13(2)(b) | 24.03 Where no proposal acceptable to the International Bureau is made within the time limit, there are two possibilities. If the Office of origin has specified the class in which it considers that the term should be classified, the International Bureau will include the term in the international registration just as it appears in the international application, but the international registration will contain an indication to the effect that, in the opinion of the International Bureau, the term is too vague for the purposes of classification, or is incomprehensible, or is linguistically incorrect, as the case may be. If, however, no class has been indicated, the International Bureau will delete the term and will notify the Office of origin and inform the applicant accordingly. |
Other Irregularities |
25.01 Certain irregularities can only be remedied by the Office of origin and not by the applicant, while for others, the Regulations provide for either the Office or the applicant to rectify the irregularity. |
|
|
|
Rule 11(4) |
25.02 There are a number of irregularities which have to be remedied by the Office of origin within three months after notification, failing which the international application will be considered abandoned, and the Office of origin will be notified accordingly. The applicant will be informed of any such notification. |
| Rule 11(4)(a) | 25.03 Remedying of the following irregularities is the responsibility of the Office of origin, since an international application containing such defects should not have been forwarded to the International Bureau by that Office:
If, therefore, the International Bureau considers that the international application is irregular in any of the above respects, it will so notify the Office of origin, and at the same time inform the applicant. |
25.04 Some of these irregularities are a straightforward matter for the Office of origin. Others might necessitate consultation with the applicant - for example, if the International Bureau considers that there are irregularities relating to the entitlement of the applicant to file an international application (see paragraphs B.II.10.03 and 10.04). |
|
|
|
Rule 11(3) |
25.05 This rule relates only to fees and contemplates only the case where the fees for the international application have been paid through the Office of origin. Where, in such a case, the International Bureau considers that the amount of fees received is less than the amount required, it will notify both the Office of origin and the applicant, specifying the missing amount. Normally, the Office of origin will leave it to the applicant to arrange for the necessary payment (either directly to the International Bureau or again through the Office). Alternatively the Office may itself pay the missing amount and make its own arrangements to recover the amount from the applicant. If the missing amount is not paid within three months from the date of the notification, the international application is considered abandoned and the International Bureau will notify both the Office and the applicant accordingly. |
|
|
Rule 11(2)(a) |
25.06 If the International Bureau considers that there is any irregularity other than those listed for remedying by the Office of origin, or by the Office of origin or the applicant, such irregularity must be remedied by the applicant. In such a case, the International Bureau will notify the applicant and at the same time inform the Office of origin. Such irregularities may, for example, relate to the following: - the information given concerning the applicant or representative does not comply with all the requirements but is sufficient for the International Bureau to identify the applicant and to contact the representative; for example, the address is incomplete, or any necessary transliteration is missing; - the indications given concerning the claiming of priority are not sufficient; for example, no filing date of the earlier application is given or the priority claim purports to relate to goods and services not covered by the international application; - the reproduction of the mark is not sufficiently clear; - the international application contains a color claim, but no color reproduction of the mark appears in item 7 of the form; - the mark consists of, or contains, matter in characters other than Latin characters, or numerals other than Arabic numerals, and the international application contains no transliteration; - the international application contains, in respect of one or more of the designated Contracting Parties, a limitation of the list of goods and services, and that limitation refers to goods and services not covered by the main list of goods and services; - the amount of fees paid directly to the International Bureau by the applicant or his representative is insufficient; - instructions have been given to pay the fees by debit to an account opened with the International Bureau, but the necessary amount is not available in the account; - no fees at all have been paid. |
| Rule 11(2)(b) | 25.07 Any such irregularity may be remedied by the applicant within three months from the date on which the notification of the irregularity was sent by the International Bureau. Where the irregularity relates to a deficiency in the indications concerning a claim to priority and this is not corrected within this period, the priority claim will not be recorded in the International Register. In any other case, where the international application does not comply with the requirements of the Regulations, the international application is considered abandoned if the irregularity is not remedied within the period allowed; the International Bureau will inform accordingly the applicant and the Office of origin. |
| Rule 11(5) | 25.08 Where failure to remedy an irregularity leads to the abandonment of the international application, the International Bureau will refund the fees paid, after deducting an amount corresponding to one half of the basic fee for a registration in black and white. |
| 25.09 Where the international application purports to designate a Contracting Party that may not be designated (for example, because it is a party only to the Protocol and the Office of origin is the Office of a country party only to the Agreement, or where the applicant has attempted to designate the Contracting Party whose Office is the Office of origin), the International Bureau will disregard the designation and will inform accordingly the Office of origin. | |
|
|
Rule 11(6)(a) |
25.10 Where a Contracting Party that has been designated under the Protocol is one which requires a declaration of intention to use the mark which is on a separate form annexed to the international application and the International Bureau finds that the declaration is missing or does not comply with the applicable requirements, the International Bureau will promptly notify the applicant and the Office of origin. Provided that the missing or corrected declaration is received by the International Bureau within a period of two months from the date on which the request to present the international application was received by the Office of origin, the declaration will be deemed to have been duly filed, and the date of the international registration will be unaffected by the irregularity. |
Rule 11(6)(c) |
25.11 If however the missing or corrected declaration is not received within that period, the designation of the Contracting Party in question will be deemed not to have been made. The International Bureau will so notify both the applicant and the Office of origin and will reimburse any fee paid in connection with the designation of that Contracting Party. The International Bureau will also point out that the designation in question may be effected as a subsequent designation, provided that such designation is accompanied by the required declaration of intent to use. |
Registration, Notification and Publication |
Rule 14(1) |
26.01 Where the International Bureau finds that the international application conforms to the applicable requirements, it registers the mark in the International Register. It also notifies the Offices of the designated Contracting Parties of the international registration, informs the Office of origin and sends a certificate to the holder. Where however the Office of origin so wishes and has informed the International Bureau accordingly, the certificate will be sent to the holder through the Office of origin. The certificate of international registration is not considered to be a notification and will always be in the language of the international application even if the applicant has expressed the wish referred to in paragraph B.II.09.07. |
| Rule 32(1)(a)(i) | 26.02 The international registration is published in the Gazette. |
1 This results from the fact that Members of the WTO are obliged by Article 2(1) of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) to comply with Article 4 of the Paris Convention. However, the members of the Madrid Union that are not Members of the WTO are not obliged to recognize the effects of a priority claim based on an application filed in a Member of the WTO that is not party to the Paris Convention. However, the Office of origin should not decline to transmit such a claim. Otherwise, a designated State which is a Member of the WTO would be hindered from fulfilling its obligation to recognize the priority claim.
2 This results from Article 4A(2) of the Paris Convention. On this basis, the International Bureau records claims to priority from applications for Community Trade Marks filed with the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market.
[Guide] [Part A] [Part B: Chapter I] [Part B: Chapter II] [Subject index]







