Guide to the International Registration of Marks
Part B: Chapter I
[Back to main table of contents for the Guide] [Part A] [Part B: Chapter I] [Part B: Chapter II] [Subject index]
CHAPTER I: GENERAL
COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE INTERNATIONAL BUREAU
Electronic Communications
Official FormsCalculation of Time Limits
Irregularities in Postal and Delivery Services
LanguagesTrilingual Regime
Regime Applicable to Certain International Registrations Resulting from International Applications Made Before April 1, 2004 or International Applications Governed Exclusively by the Agreement Made Between April 1, 2004 and August 31, 2008, Inclusively
PAYMENT OF FEES TO THE INTERNATIONAL BUREAU
Currency of Payment
Mode of Payment
Date of Payment
Change in the Amount of Fee
Fee Reduction for Applicants from Least Developed Countries
REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL BUREAU
In International Application, Subsequent Designation or Request to Record a Change
In a Separate Communication
Only One RepresentativeIrregular Appointment
Recording and Notification of Appointment
Effect of the Appointment
Cancellation of AppointmentCancellation at the Request of the Representative
Notification of Cancellation
Introduction |
This Chapter is concerned with procedural matters which are of interest both to applicants and holders and also to Offices. It deals with communications with the International Bureau (including the modalities of communication, the calculation of time limits and the language of communication), the payment of fees and with representation before the International Bureau.
Communications with the International Bureau |
01.01 Three kinds of communications are, in principle, possible:
- between the International Bureau and the Office of a Contracting Party;
- between the International Bureau and the applicant or holder, or his representative;
- between the applicant or holder (or representative) and an Office.
01.02 Communications which do not involve the International Bureau (that is, communications between an Office and an applicant or holder or a representative) are outside the scope of the Agreement and Protocol and of the Regulations. They are a matter for the law and practice of the Contracting Party concerned.
01.03 Communications between the International Bureau and an Office or applicant or holder are governed, as regards the form and the manner of communicating and such matters as language and the effective date of the communication, by the Regulations and the Administrative Instructions. In particular, the Regulations sometimes allow the applicant or holder to choose whether to communicate directly with the International Bureau or through an Office. Often, however, such choice is not given. In particular, an international application must always be filed through the Office of origin.
01.04 Unless otherwise specified, where this Guide refers to a communication being sent to or by an applicant or holder, this is to be understood as meaning that, where a representative is recorded in the International Register for that applicant or holder, the communication will be sent to, or may validly be sent by, that representative (see paragraphs B.I.11.03 to 11.05).
Modalities of Communications |
Communications in Writing |
Facsimile |
Electronic Communications |
A.I. Section 11(a)(i) |
03.01 Any communication between an Office and the International Bureau, including the presentation of an international application, may be made by electronic transmission. The modalities for such communication, including the presentation of the content of official forms and the means for self-identification of the sender, are a matter for agreement between each Office and the International Bureau. |
| 03.02 The International Bureau has already established electronic communications with a number of Offices and a substantial proportion of international applications are now transmitted electronically to the International Bureau. Electronic communication is also used by a number of Offices for the transmission of refusals, statements of grant of protection and modifications. In addition, the number of Offices to which the International Bureau sends notifications electronically continues to increase. | |
| A.I. Section 11(a)(ii) | 03.03 Communications between the International Bureau and applicants and holders may also take place by electronic means, at a time and in a manner and format to be determined by the International Bureau. The particulars of the modality of such communications will be published in the Gazette. |
| A.I. Section 11(b) | 03.04 Provided the sender can be identified and can be reached, the International Bureau will promptly, by electronic transmission, confirm receipt of the electronic communication, and of any deficiencies in the transmission (for example, if it is incomplete or illegible). |
A.I. Section 11(c) |
03.05 Where, because of a time difference between the place from where an electronic communication has been sent and Geneva, the date on which the transmittal of a communication by electronic means was started is different from the date on which it was received by the International Bureau, the earlier of the two dates shall be considered to be the date of receipt by the International Bureau. |
Rule 30 |
03.06 In 2006, WIPO introduced an online international trademark renewal service enabling users to maintain their trademark rights simply and economically and, more recently, online facilities were made available to users wishing to file a request for the continuation of protection of their trademarks in accordance with Rule 39 of the Common Regulations. |
| 03.07 Furthermore, the International Bureau offers to users the possibility of receiving electronically a number of communications, such as notifications of provisional refusal, copies of statements of grant of protection and copies of statements of confirmation or withdrawal of provisional refusal. For that purpose, holders and their representatives are invited to communicate to the International Bureau an e-mail address that they wish the International Bureau to use as the sole address where those communications are to be sent. | |
| 03.08 Users may take advantage of this service by sending an e-mail message to e-marks@wipo.int indicating the e-mail address which they wish the International Bureau to use for this purpose, as well as the list of all international registrations concerned. Further information in this regard is available in Information Notice No. 15/2007 on the Madrid website (www.wipo.int/madrid). The International Bureau will commence sending the communications in question by e-mail within one month following receipt of the e-mail address. The notifications concerned are transmitted as attachments in PDF format. It is the intention of the International Bureau to introduce, in due course, a wider range of inbound electronic communications from users. | |
| A.I. Section 7 | 03.09 As regards the electronic communications referred to in Section 11(a)(i), a signature may be replaced by a mode of identification agreed upon between the International Bureau and the Office concerned. With respect to the electronic communications referred to in Section 11(a)(ii), a signature may be replaced by a mode of identification to be determined by the International Bureau. |
Official Forms |
Rule 1(xxvii) |
04.01 Where the Agreement, Protocol or Regulations require the use of an official form, this refers to a form established by the International Bureau. Copies of the forms are available from the International Bureau, from Offices of Contracting Parties and on WIPO's website. |
| 04.02 As an alternative to using a form produced by the International Bureau, Offices, applicants or holders may generate their own forms. Such self-generated forms will be acceptable to the International Bureau provided that they have the same contents and format as the official forms. Where, however, such a form is presented through an Office (for example, for an international application), it is for the Office to decide whether it is acceptable (see paragraph B.I.04.07). | |
04.03 The items in such self-generated forms need not have the same spacing and layout as in the forms established by the International Bureau. Indeed, one advantage of producing such forms is that as much space can be allocated to a given item as is needed; for example, where an international application is in the names of several applicants, or there is a particularly long list of goods and services, use of such self-produced forms can avoid the need for continuation sheets. The following prescriptions must, however, be observed:
"6. Priority: Not applicable";
|
|
A.I. Section 6(a) |
04.04 The form must be completed legibly, by means of a typewriter or other machine. Handwritten forms are not acceptable. |
Continuation Sheets |
04.05 Where the space available in any part of a form is insufficient (for example, in the case of an international application, because there is more than one applicant, or more than one basic registration or application, or more than one priority application) one or more continuation sheets should be used (unless the use of a self-generated form avoids the need to use such continuation sheets). On the continuation sheet, it is necessary to indicate "Continuation of item number ....", the information then being presented in the same manner as required in the form itself. The number of continuation sheets used should be indicated in the box provided at the beginning of the form.
Indication of Dates |
04.06 Any indication of a date in an official form must consist of the day in two digits, followed by the number of the month in two digits, followed by the number of the year in four digits, all in Arabic numerals and day, month and year being separated by slashes (/). For example, the date March 9, 2008, is to be written as "09/03/2008".
Optional Forms |
04.07 In addition to the official forms, several optional forms are available, for example, for renewing an international registration. The use of these forms is not compulsory; they are provided by the International Bureau for the convenience of users.
Calculation of Time Limits |
05.01 The Agreement, the Protocol and the Regulations lay down time limits within which certain communications must be made. Normally the date on which the time limit expires is the date on which the communication must be received by the International Bureau. An exception to this is the time limit within which the Office of a designated Contracting Party may notify refusal of protection; in this case, it is the date on which the Office sends the notification to the International Bureau which is decisive. |
|
Rule 4(5)
Rule 4(2)
Rule 4(3) |
05.02 Any communication from the International Bureau which refers to a time limit will indicate the date of expiry of that time limit, calculated in accordance with the following rules:
|
Rule 4(4) |
05.03 If, in accordance with paragraph 05.02, a period within which a communication must be received by the International Bureau would expire on a day on which the International Bureau is not open to the public, it will expire on the next subsequent day on which the Bureau is open. For example, if a period within which a communication must be received by the International Bureau ends on a Saturday or Sunday, the deadline will be met if the communication is received on the following Monday (assuming that the Monday is not a holiday); and, for example, a period of three months starting from October 1 will not expire on January 1 (which is a holiday at the International Bureau), but on the next working day. A list of the days on which the International Bureau is not scheduled to be open to the public during the current and the following calendar year is published in the WIPO Gazette of International Marks. |
| 05.04 Likewise if, in accordance with paragraph 05.02, the period within which a communication (such as a notice of refusal of protection) must be sent by an Office to the International Bureau would expire on a day on which the Office concerned is not open to the public, it will expire on the next subsequent day on which the Office is open. It should be noted that this applies only where the period in question is specified in terms of the communication being sent by an Office within that period. Where the period is specified in terms of the communication being received by the International Bureau within that period, it is paragraph 05.03 that applies; in such a case, late receipt of the communication by the International Bureau cannot be excused on the ground that its dispatch was delayed because the Office which sent it was closed. |
Irregularities in Postal and Delivery Services |
Rule 5(1) and (2) |
06.01 Where a time limit is not met because a communication addressed to the International Bureau by an applicant or holder or by an Office is unduly delayed or is lost because of an irregularity in a postal or delivery service, this may be excused, provided due care has been exercised by the sender and the communication was dispatched in good time. The rule is that failure to meet a time limit shall be excused if the party which sent the communication submits evidence showing, to the satisfaction of the International Bureau:
|
Rule 5(3) |
06.02 Failure to meet a time limit shall be excused only if the evidence referred to in paragraph 06.01, and the communication or a duplicate thereof, are received by the International Bureau not later than six months after the expiry of the time limit. |
Article 3(4) |
06.03 Where an international application or a subsequent designation is received from an Office by the International Bureau more than two months after it was filed with that Office, the international registration or the designation will normally bear the date on which it was actually received by the Bureau. Where however the Office concerned indicates that the late receipt resulted from an irregularity in the postal or delivery service, the application or designation will be considered to have been received within the time limit (and will therefore be able to keep the date on which it was filed with that Office (see paragraphs B.II.28.01 and 45.02)), provided that the circumstances referred to in paragraphs 06.01 and 02 apply. |
Languages |
General Principles |
Trilingual Regime |
Rule 6(1) |
07.01 An international application may be filed in English, French or Spanish, according to what is prescribed by the Office of origin. That is, the Office of origin is entitled to restrict the choice of the applicant to only one language, or to two languages, or may permit the applicant to choose between any of the three languages. |
Rule 6(2)(i) Rule 17(2)(v)
|
07.02 Any communication concerning an international application or an international registration, which is addressed to the International Bureau by an Office or by an applicant or holder shall be in English, French or Spanish, at the option of the party sending the communication, irrespective of the language in which the international application was filed. However, there are two exceptions to this rule:
|
Rule 6(2)(b)(iii) |
07.03 Any notification concerning an application or registration, which is addressed by the International Bureau to an Office, will normally be in the language in which the international application was filed. An Office may however notify the International Bureau that it wishes to receive all notifications concerning international applications or registrations in English, in French or in Spanish, irrespective of the language in which the international application was filed. That would enable an Office not to accept notifications in a prescribed language (or in two such languages) and to indicate to the International Bureau which other language should be used instead. Where the notification by the International Bureau concerns the recording in the International Register of an international registration, the notification will indicate the language in which the relevant international application was received by the International Bureau. |
Rule 6(2)(iv) |
07.04 Any notification concerning an application or registration, which is addressed by the International Bureau to an applicant or holder, will normally be in the language in which the international application was filed. An applicant or holder may however inform the International Bureau, by checking the relevant box in the international application form, that he wishes to receive all such notifications in English, in French or in Spanish, irrespective of the language in which the international application was filed. |
Rule 40(4) |
07.05 In accordance with Rule 40(4), Rule 6 as in force before April 1, 2004, shall continue to apply to any international application filed before that date and to any international application governed exclusively by the Agreement filed between that date and August 31, 2008, inclusively, and also to any communication relating thereto and to any communication, recording in the International Register or publication in the Gazette relating to an international registration resulting therefrom. However, where the international registration has been the subject of a subsequent designation under the Protocol between April 1, 2004, and August 31, 2008, or the international registration has been or is the subject of a subsequent designation on or after September 1, 2008, and the subsequent designation is recorded in the International Register, any communication relating to such an international registration, may be in English, French or Spanish subject to the exceptions of Rule 17(2)(v) and (3), and Rule 7(2) (see paragraph B.I.07.05). |
|
07.06 In other words, before September 1, 2008, an application which was governed exclusively by the Agreement had to be filed in French. In addition, any communication concerning such an international application or an international registration resulting therefrom, which was addressed to the International Bureau by an applicant, holder or an Office, had to be in French, and any communication concerning such an application or registration, which was addressed by the International Bureau to the applicant, holder or an Office also had to be in French. As explained before in paragraph B.I.07.05, as of September 1, 2008, the rule (in accordance with Rule 6, as in force before April 1, 2004) is that all communications relating to an international registration resulting from such an application must likewise be in French. However, where a Contracting Party has been subsequently designated under the Protocol on or after April 1, 2004, or, under the Agreement or the Protocol on or after September 1, 2008, and this subsequent designation is recorded, paragraphs B.I.07.01 to 07.04 apply instead (i.e. trilingual regime). In the case that a subsequent designation under the Protocol was filed before April 1, 2004, any communication relating to such an international registration can be made in English or French. |
|
07.07 Moreover, an international application governed exclusively by the Protocol or by both the Agreement and the Protocol, which was filed before April 1, 2004, had to be in English or French. Also, any communication concerning such an international application or an international registration resulting therefrom, shall be in English or French. However, where a Contracting Party has been subsequently designated under the Protocol on or after April 1, 2004, or, has been or is subsequently designated under the Agreement or the Protocol on or after September 1, 2008, and this subsequent designation is recorded, paragraphs B.I.07.01 to 07.04 apply instead (i.e., trilingual regime). |
Payment of Fees to the International Bureau |
Currency of Payment |
Mode of Payment |
Date of Payment |
Change in the Amount of Fee |
Rule 34(7)(a) |
08.09 Where the amount of a fee payable in respect of the filing of an international application changes between the date on which the request to present the international application was received or is deemed to have been received (see paragraphs B.II.20.01 to 20.14) by the Office of origin and the date on which the application was received by the International Bureau, it is the fee that was valid on the earlier date that is applicable. |
| Rule 34(7)(b) | 08.10 Where a subsequent designation is presented through an Office and the amount of a fee payable in respect of that designation changes between the date on which the request to present the subsequent designation was received by that Office and the date on which the designation was received by the International Bureau, it is the fee that was valid on the earlier date that is applicable. |
Rule 34(7)(d) |
08.11 Where the amount of a renewal fee changes between the date on which the fee was paid to the International Bureau and the date on which renewal is due, then
Where the renewal fee is paid after the due date, it is the fee that was valid on the due date that is applicable. |
Rule 34(7)(e) |
08.12 In any other case, the applicable amount is that which was valid on the date on which the payment was received by the International Bureau. |
Fee Reduction for Applicants from Least Developed Countries |
08.13 Applicants having a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment, or a domicile in a least developed country, or being a national of a least developed country (in accordance with the list established by the United Nations), and who file their international applications through the trademark office of such country, as the office of origin, will be required to pay only 10% of the amount of the basic fee. This is reflected in the Schedule of Fees and has been incorporated in the fee calculator on the Madrid website (http://www.wipo.int/madrid/feecalc/). |
|
| 08.14 The list of least developed countries is maintained and updated on a regular basis by the United Nations and may be consulted on the United National website at www.un.org. The list may also be consulted on the WIPO website at http://www.wipo.int/ldcs/en/country. |
Representation before the International Bureau |
Appointment of Representative |
10.01 With regard to who may be appointed as a representative before the International Bureau, the Madrid system does not provide for any requirement as to professional qualification, nationality, residence or domicile.
Method of Appointment |
In International Application, Subsequent Designation or Request to Record a Change |
In a Separate Communication |
Only One Representative |
Irregular Appointment |
Recording and Notification of Appointment |
Effect of the Appointment |
Rule 3(5) |
11.03 Unless the Regulations expressly require otherwise, a duly recorded representative may always sign a communication, or carry out any other procedural step, in place of the applicant or holder. Any communication addressed by the representative to the International Bureau has the same effect as if it had been addressed to the International Bureau by the applicant or holder. Similarly, where a representative has been recorded, the International Bureau will send to him any invitation, notification or other communication which, in the absence of a representative, would have been sent to the applicant or holder. Any such communication has the same effect as if it had been addressed to the applicant or holder. |
Rule 3(3) A Article 7(4) Rule 30(3) |
11.04 Where a representative has been appointed, the International Bureau will not normally send communications directly to the applicant or holder. There are a few exceptions to this rule:
|
| 11.05 Apart from these exceptions, whenever this Guide refers to anything being sent to, or done by, an applicant or holder, this should be understood as a reference to it being sent to, or allowed to be done by, a duly recorded representative. |
Cancellation of Appointment |
Rule 3(6)(a) |
12.01 The recording of a representative will be cancelled upon receipt of a request signed by the applicant, holder or representative. Cancellation may be requested by means of a simple letter. The cancellation of the recording may be effected for all the international applications or registrations of the same applicant or holder in respect of which the representative had been duly appointed, or any specified international applications or registrations of that applicant or holder |
Rule 3(6)(a) |
12.02 The recording will also be cancelled ex officio by the International Bureau where a new representative has been duly appointed. As already noted (see paragraph B.I.10.05), only one representative may be recognized at any one time; the appointment of a new representative is therefore assumed to replace any representative previously appointed. |
| 12.03 The recording of a representative will also be cancelled ex officio by the International Bureau where a change in ownership has been recorded, unless the representative is expressly re-appointed by the new holder of the international registration. | |
Rule 3(6)(b) |
12.04 As a general rule, the cancellation becomes effective from the date on which the International Bureau receives the communication leading to the cancellation. Where however the cancellation is requested by the representative, the following paragraphs apply. |
Cancellation at the Request of the Representative |
Notification of Cancellation |
No Fee for Recording |
[Guide] [Part A] [Part B: Chapter I] [Part B: Chapter II] [Subject index]





