About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Consumer Strategies for Deterring Illegal File-Sharing Using Digital Serial Numbers
Author: [Interpret]
Source:

http://www.digitalwatermarkingalliance.org/docs/papers/DWA_WhitePaper_PiracyDeterrence.pdf

Year: 2009

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Film, Music
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To assess current attitudes and behaviours with respect to file sharing and to determine whether the inclusion of Digital Serial Numbers (DSNs) in online content would deter illegal file sharing.
Sample: 994 US consumers who share entertainment media
Methodology: Survey

Main Findings

Digital piracy is commonplace: fewer than one in five survey respondents acquire entertainment media strictly legally. Fewer than two in five acquire media both legally and illegally, and half of all downloaders acquire media only through illegal downloading/file sharing.

The most popular reasons given for illegal downloading are, in decreasing order of importance: “it is the easiest way to access digital entertainment media”, “consumers cannot afford the retail price of entertainment media”, “there is content available via download that is not otherwise readily available”, “it is easier to find desired content” and “it is easier to transfer content to other digital devices”.

More than three fourths of consumers know that it is illegal to acquire or share copyrighted material without purchasing it. But significant numbers of consumers think it should be legal – from one quarter to one half depending on the sharing/downloading scenario.

The inclusion of Digital Serial Numbers (DSNs) in online content would deter illegal downloading among 33% and illegal uploading among 52% of respondents. Among all consumers, a small but noticeable number – fewer than one in five – would increase their purchases of physical media (CDs and DVDs).

Reasons given for continuing to download despite the presence of DSNs are, in decreasing order of importance: “I do not download enough to be caught”, “the online community will remove DSNs”, “DSNs will not be enforced strongly enough to make a difference” and “my downloading would remain the same as a statement of principle”.

Consumer acceptance of DSNs is relatively high: four out of five consumers generally agree that DSNs provide a solution that is “less cumbersome”, “a better balance between consumer needs and copyright protections”, and “gives [consumers] more freedom than Digital Rights Management (DRM)”.

[Date Added: Jul 31, 2009 ]