About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: Les PME déposantes de brevets en France: caractéristiques et évolutions
Author: Hélène Perrin [OSEO]
Source:

http://www.oseo.fr/content/download/7198/162405/file/EtudeBrevetsOSEOINPI.pdf

Year: 2004

Details

Subject/Type: IP Protection
Focus: Commercialisation, Economic / Financial Impact, Enforcement, Patents
Country/Territory: France
Objective: To find out more about small and medium-sized enterprises that file patents.
Sample: About 300 small businesses that have filed a patent in 1999
Methodology: Postal questionnaire

Main Findings

6 in ten French small and medium-sized businesses that had filed a patent in 1999 are regular patent applicants, while about 40% are first-time applicants. 17% reported having experienced difficulties during the patent filing process. About 60% have benefited from at least one kind of public assistance in their innovation process.

The top three reasons given for filing patents were: protection against counterfeiting (cited by around 80%), obtaining a monopoly on the invention (about 60%), and increasing enterprise value (about 50%). In most small and medium-sized businesses (61%), the CEO is responsible for managing industrial property.

74% respondents assess the impact of filing a patent on their business as relatively positive or very positive; 25% see no impact, and just 1.4% see a relatively or very negative impact. Filing a patent had a positive impact on market share in France for 65% of respondents, and a positive impact on international market share for 48% of respondents.

39% of surveyed businesses have been involved in (offensive or defensive) litigation concerning counterfeiting.

[Date Added: Apr 9, 2009 ]