About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Doesn't Everybody Do It? Internet Piracy Attitudes and Behaviors
Author: [NFO WorldGroup]
Source:

Software & Information Industry Association
http://www.siia.net/estore/ius-01.pdf

Year: 2001

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Software
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To explore the attitudes of Internet users toward copyrighted material (software, Internet content), both in the workplace and at home.
Sample: 1.012 home users and 1.004 business users
Methodology: Online survey

Main Findings

The study establishes four categories of software and Internet content users: first, “regulators” (38% of business and 35% of consumer users respectively) are in favour of stricter copyright laws and would not knowingly or willingly violate copyright laws; with an increase in age, income or education level, there is an increase in the percentage of regulators.

Second, “obedient under protest” users (30% of business and 21% of consumer users respectively) are generally respectful of the rights of property, but think that everyone violates copyrights, that copyright law should not apply to Internet-related content or software. However, they would not like information they provide to be shared.

Third, “confused/self-justified pirates” (18% of business and 21% of consumer users respectively) believe in copyright laws, but justify the copyright infringements they commit using reasons such as “everyone does it” or “no one gets hurt”; they contend that they can do what they wish with content they own or purchased.

Fourth, “anarchists” (13% of business and 22% of consumer users respectively) are the true pirates – to them, copying or sharing either software or copyrighted information from the Internet is perfectly reasonable.


Overall, 29% of business and 31% of consumer users reported downloads of pirated software. 21% of business users admitted to having downloaded unauthorised digital content from information services. Less than 10% of consumers and less than 16% of business users indicated that they had redistributed software. Of those who have redistributed software, a majority has done so multiple times, typically between 2 and 4 times. The most often used redistribution channels were copying/downloading to disk/CD or e-mail. 54% of business users did not know whether their company permitted redistribution of content. 30% of business and 34% of consumer users downloaded free software on the Internet, and 89% and 90% of business and consumer users accessed free digital content. Male and business respondents were most likely to access free content on a daily basis.

[Date Added: Jan 20, 2009 ]