About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Informe sobre consumo de productos falsificados
Author: [Ipsos - Mora y Araujo]
Source:

Argentina Original
http://www.argentinaoriginal.org.ar/sala_de_prensa/gacetillas/Presentacion%20MA.pdf

Year: 2006

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting, Piracy
Focus: Apparel and Shoes, Beverages, Film, Food Products, Music, Personal Care Products, Software, Toys, Watches
Country/Territory: Argentina
Objective: To measure the consumption of counterfeits and to evaluate attitudes towards them.
Sample: 640 Buenos Aires metropolitan area residents, aged 16 to 70; 1.200 persons all over Argentina, aged 18 to 70
Methodology: At home interviews

Main Findings

66% of Metropolitan Buenos Aires residents buy at least “seldom” from street vendors. The most popular counterfeits acquired via such street vendors are: clothes (with 60% buying them), followed by shoes (47%), CDs (32%), and food/beverages (29%). 86% think that they can at least “sometimes” distinguish between genuine product and fake (10% affirm hardly ever/never be able to do so).

The price of a pirated product is usually less than half the price of the genuine counterpart (according to 63% of counterfeit buyers). When asked whether they would buy a CD they want if offered by a street vendor, then 57% would buy an illegal copy in the street for less than half the price of the original. 33% would not buy the pirated version when offered to do so.


66% of Argentinean residents buy at least “seldom” from street vendors. 84% think that they can at least “sometimes” distinguish between genuine product and fake (just 8% affirm hardly ever/never be able to do so). 67% agree that buying counterfeits is an illegal act, while 25% do not believe that this constitutes an illegal act.

The price of a pirated product is usually less than half the price of the genuine counterpart (according to 58% of counterfeit buyers). When asked whether they would buy a CD they want if offered by a street vendor, then 49% would buy an illegal copy in the street for less than half the price of the original. 39% would not buy the pirated version when offered to do so.

52% agree that counterfeiting hurts big brands that as a consequence invest less and generate less employment (36% disagree); 59% agree that buying fakes deprives the government of revenues it could spend for health, education or housing (30% disagree).

The probability of buying fakes decreases as age increases (86% of 18 to 29 year olds buy counterfeits, while just 41% of 60+ year olds do so). Members of all socio-economic strata buy counterfeits; however, the more privileged strata are somewhat less likely to purchase counterfeits.

[Date Added: Jan 20, 2009 ]