About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Music and video downloading moves beyond P2P
Author: Mary Madden, Lee Rainie [Pew Internet & American Life Project]
Source:

http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Filesharing_March05.pdf

Year: 2005

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Film, Music
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To determine current file-sharing behaviour and attitudes towards government actions against illegal file sharing.
Sample: 1.421 adult Internet users, 2.201 randomly selected adults
Methodology: Telephone interviews

Main Findings

27% download music/video files and about half of them have found ways other than the traditional peer-to-peer (P2P) networks or paid online services to obtain these digital music/video files. 19% copy files from other people's MP3 players, while 20% obtain files via instant messaging or e-mail.

53% of Internet users believe firms owning/operating file-sharing networks should be the ones held responsible for pirated files. 57% of broadband users say there is not much the government can do to reduce illegal file sharing. 28% former downloaders admit they stopped their illegal activities out of fear of getting in trouble/after hearing about RIAA lawsuits, while 15% stopped because of the viruses their computers got infected with. Other reasons for stopping included finding other ways of obtaining the music they wanted (7%), being fed up with the amount of time it consumed (7%), losing interest (5%) and not finding the files or quality that they wanted (4%).

[Date Added: Aug 12, 2008 ]